arXiv subjects

Thomas Thebaud

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas Thebaud.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Toward Complete Speaker Anonymization: a Streaming Cascaded System for Voice Privacy and PII Removal

We present a cascade streaming voice privacy system, consisting of ASR, NLP, and TTS modules. By leveraging recent improvements in all three aspects of speech and language processing, we show that such a system is capable of achieving a result comparable to state-of-the-art offline voice privacy systems, while providing controllable capabilities of content protection beyond voice. With an estimated utterance-onset end-to-end latency of 717 ms, the presented system preserves speech content with 11% WER on Librispeech, while detecting PII with a 69% SLU F1 score and achieving up to 47.66% EER against a semi-informed attacker.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2026

CARES: A Controlled Synthetic Benchmark of Speaker Reactions to Sound

Automatic audio scene description turns a recording into a text account of a situation. One difficulty is deciding which elements of the audio should be kept, since a description cannot include them all. Annotators disagree about this, making a ground truth hard to obtain. In this work, we first define the ground truth, then generate the data. We focus on audio events and define sound salience with a simple rule: a sound is salient when a speaker audibly reacts to it. For scale and variety, a controlled set of scenarios fixes the ground truth, and a language model writes the dialogues. The resulting corpus, CARES, contains 10,000 two-speaker scenes. We then benchmark six audio-language models on three tasks: identifying the scene, tagging the sounds present, and classifying reactions. We show that these models hear the sounds but miss how the speakers react to them.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2026

Vox-Profile: A Speech Foundation Model Benchmark for Characterizing Diverse Speaker Traits and Speech Properties

We introduce Vox-Profile, a comprehensive benchmark to characterize rich speaker traits and speech properties using speech foundation models. Unlike prior work that targets a single dimension of speaker traits, Vox-Profile provides holistic and multi-dimensional profiles spanning both static speaker traits (e.g., age, sex, accent, voice quality) and dynamic speech traits (e.g., emotion, speech flow). This benchmark is grounded in speech science and linguistics, developed with domain experts to accurately index speaker and speech characteristics. We report benchmark experiments using over 15 publicly available speech datasets and several widely used speech foundation models that target various static and dynamic speaker and speech properties. In addition to benchmark experiments, we showcase several downstream applications supported by Vox-Profile. First, we show that Vox-Profile can augment existing speech recognition datasets to analyze ASR performance variability. Vox-Profile is also used as a tool to evaluate the performance of speech generation systems. Finally, we assess the quality of our automated profiles through comparison with human evaluation and show convergent validity. Vox-Profile is publicly available at: https://github.com/tiantiaf0627/vox-profile-release.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2026

ProPS: Prompted Profile Synthesis for Natural Language-Conditioned Speaker Embedding Distributions

Speaker embeddings, or x-vectors, are widely used to represent speaker identity and speaker-related attributes, but existing embedding extractors are typically descriptive rather than generative: they map an observed speech segment to an x-vector, which is then used for downstream applications. We introduce ProPS, Prompted Profile Synthesis, a framework for generating distributions of speaker embeddings conditioned on natural language prompts such as "a thirties male speaker with an Indian accent". ProPS converts human-written profile descriptions into sentence embeddings and uses a mixture density network trained on a large-scale dataset to predict a Gaussian mixture model in the x-vector space. The model is trained by maximizing the likelihood that real speaker embeddings match the requested profile, and its generated distributions are evaluated by negative log-likelihood on held-out x-vectors and by attribute classification accuracies on sampled synthetic x-vectors. Experiments show that ProPS produces profile-conditioned distributions and generates x-vectors that preserve requested speaker attributes such as age, gender, accent, and prosodic characteristics. This design enables controllable speaker-profile synthesis for speech generation systems like Text-To-Speech (TTS) or Voice Conversion (VC) while anchoring generated distributions in observed speaker-embedding structure.

eess.AS↗

arXiv2026

Who Are They to Each Other? Multi-Agent Reasoning for Speaker Relationship Inference

Inferring speaker relationships from spoken conversations is an important step towards socially aware speech understanding. However, this task remains underexplored, and supervised modeling is costly to train and scale. At the same time, existing inference-time LLM approaches provide limited structure for handling subtle, distributed, and multimodal relational cues that may support multiple plausible interpretations. To address these limitations, we introduce a training-free multi-agent reasoning framework that organizes inference through structured interaction among LLM agents, allowing relationship judgments to be proposed, challenged, and adjudicated without task-specific training. We instantiate this framework with two complementary designs. We propose Multi-Role Multi-Agent Debate as a task-specific adaptation of standard multi-agent debate for speaker relationship inference, assigning agents complementary roles or social-theory-grounded perspectives rather than a single undifferentiated viewpoint. In contrast, we introduce Multi-Agent Compete, a competition-based protocol that compares agent judgments through pairwise adjudication, eliminates weaker candidates, and retains the most defensible one. We evaluate these methods on the Seamless Interaction dataset across different modality settings, covering both binary classification and fine-grained relationship-detail prediction. Results suggest that they improve over zero-shot and existing multi-agent baselines in most cases. Human evaluation further suggests that this task is challenging even for people. LLM methods can sometimes outperform human annotators in text-included settings but are less competitive in the audio setting. Together, these findings suggest that relationship inference benefits from structured inference-time interaction among agents, while acoustic cues are not yet fully captured by current models.

cs.MA↗

arXiv2026

When Text Misleads: Inconsistent-Aware Reasoning for Audio-Grounded Dialogue

Understanding spoken dialogue requires joint reasoning over lexical content and paralinguistic acoustic signals such as emotion and conversational intent. However, existing evaluations often allow shortcuts based on transcripts or single-modality solutions, obscuring whether models genuinely ground predictions in speech. We formalize this failure mode as cross-modal disagreement, where transcripts suggest plausible but incorrect surface interpretations while acoustic cues such as prosody or speaking style support different answers. We develop a scalable framework that identifies text-biased surface interpretations and converts disagreement regions into conflict QA examples. We also include consistent cases where transcript-based and speech-grounded interpretations agree, enabling evaluation beyond adversarial audio dependence. This results in ContraTalk, a controlled benchmark containing 501 questions across five discourse dimensions: interaction behavior, emotion state, dialogue act, social stance, and conversational intent. We further develop an agentic-style reasoning framework that converts speech into an Audio Twin, a text-readable representation of localized acoustic cues that exposes acoustic evidence to the reasoning model. Experiments show that strong text-only LLMs exceed 90% accuracy in consistent cases but drop to 33-48% in conflict cases. Direct AudioLLMs provide only partial grounding, still selecting the transcript-biased trap in roughly 30-40% of conflict cases. Our Audio Twin framework improves conflict-case accuracy while reducing trap selection, but its consistent-case behavior remains backbone-dependent. These results identify transcript-based shortcuts as an important failure mode in spoken dialogue understanding and show that explicit acoustic evidence aggregation provides a more controllable interface for diagnosing and improving speech-grounded reasoning.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Reconstruct! Don't Encode: Self-Supervised Representation Reconstruction Loss for High-Intelligibility and Low-Latency Streaming Neural Audio Codec

Neural audio codecs optimized for mel-spectrogram reconstruction often fail to preserve intelligibility. While semantic encoder distillation improves encoded representations, it does not guarantee content preservation in reconstructed speech. In this work, we demonstrate that self-supervised representation reconstruction (SSRR) loss fundamentally improves codec training and performance. First, SSRR significantly accelerates convergence, enabling competitive results after 300k training steps on a single H200 GPU. Second, it enhances intelligibility by reconstructing distilled self-supervised representations from codec outputs. Third, SSRR enables high intelligibility without additional lookahead in streaming Transformer-based codecs, allowing a zero-lookahead architecture for real-time deployment. On LibriSpeech test-clean, JHCodec achieves the best WER and CER among the evaluated codecs while maintaining zero lookahead and low end-to-end latency. We open-source the full implementation, training pipeline, and demo on GitHubh ttps://github.com/jhcodec843/jhcodec.

eess.AS↗

arXiv2026

Leveraging Gradient Reversal Loss and Multitask Learning for Datasets-Aware Audio Deepfake Detection

Recent advances in speech synthesis and voice conversion, which pose threats to security and privacy, have underscored the need for deepfake detection technology. Although existing detection systems achieve strong performance on individual datasets, they often fail to generalize across diverse datasets. Prior methods for improving generalization, including data augmentation, adversarial training on auxiliary factors such as language or codec types, and Mixture-of-Experts (MoE), are limited by predefined augmentation coverage, difficulties in obtaining auxiliary factors, and substantial model complexity. In this work, we propose a practical dataset-aware framework for deepfake detection. Our method targets heterogeneous datasets for which auxiliary annotations such as language, codec, or spoofing method may not be consistently available. We therefore rely only on dataset identity as a naturally available supervisory signal for multitask (MT) and gradient reversal layer (GRL) training, allowing the model to investigate both dataset-aware multitask supervision and adversarial suppression of dataset-specific information. We conduct experiments following the 2025 Speech DeepFake Arena benchmark protocol, evaluating our model across multiple evaluation datasets and reporting aggregate performance in terms of Equal Error Rate (EER), including Average EER and Pooled EER. Compared with the baseline, MT reduces Average EER by 13.14% relatively, while GRL reduces Pooled EER by 5.32% relatively. These results demonstrate that our method can improve aggregate detection performance across heterogeneous evaluation datasets, offering a practical solution for deploying reliable deepfake detection systems on diverse and unseen real-world data.

eess.AS↗

arXiv2026

SPEARBench: A Benchmark for Naturalness Evaluation in Streaming Speech-to-Speech Language Models

Streaming speech-to-speech language models aim to answer spoken queries directly with synthetic speech. However, standard speech and text benchmarks do not capture whether these systems behave naturally in conversations, where timing, turn-taking, prosody, interpersonal stance, language and dialect consistency, and relationship-aware appropriateness jointly shape perceived quality. We introduce SPEARBench, a benchmark for evaluating naturalness in speech-to-speech language models from question-answer interactions. SPEARBench constructs controlled dialogue prompts from the Seamless Interaction corpus, runs inference across multiple models, and evaluates generated answers using a multidimensional protocol that covers response latency, interruptions, speech quality, ASR robustness, language and dialect consistency, emotional naturalness, interpersonal stance, and explainable distributional baselines. The benchmark includes original human answers as a reference condition and reports results for several contemporary models. Results show that current models can achieve high signal-level quality and low ASR error while still differing from human conversational behavior in latency, overlap, dialect preservation, emotional adaptation, and interpersonal stance dynamics.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

TurnNat: Automatic Evaluation of Turn-Taking Naturalness in Dyadic Spoken Dialogue

Turn-taking naturalness is central to full-duplex spoken dialogue systems, yet its automatic evaluation remains limited. Existing evaluations often rely on human judgments or behavior-specific timing metrics, making it difficult to compare heterogeneous timing failures within a unified framework. We propose TurnNat, a likelihood-based framework for automatic turn-taking naturalness evaluation in two-channel spoken dialogue. A causal turn-taking prediction model trained on natural conversations estimates future two-speaker voice-activity states, and the negative log-likelihood (NLL) of the observed future activity measures timing atypicality. TurnNat pools frame-level NLLs over turn-taking boundary units (TBUs) extracted from utterance onsets and offsets, and aggregates mean and tail TBU scores into a dialogue-level naturalness score. We further construct a controlled perturbation benchmark of paired natural and perturbed dialogue clips, validated by human naturalness judgments. Experiments on this benchmark show that TurnNat successfully identifies unnatural turn-taking perturbations across heterogeneous timing failures.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

TRACE: Temporal Relationship-Aware Conversational Entrainment Detection in Dyadic Speech

With the proliferation of speech AI agents, understanding emotional entrainment in conversational interaction has become increasingly important. Emotional entrainment is shaped by social relationships and conversational context, influencing affective coordination over time. We introduce DyadEE, a dataset for emotional entrainment detection in dyadic speech interactions, containing both emotionally entrained conversations and synthetic interactions where entrainment is disrupted through partner swapping and emotion resynthesis. We further propose TRACE, a window-level framework that models dyadic interaction as ordered sequences of acoustic embeddings derived from emotion fine-tuned Whisper representations, treating each sample as an interaction trace rather than pooled utterances. Experimental results on DyadEE show that incorporating conversational context and relationship information improves emotional entrainment detection, with TRACE achieving the best accuracy of 97.01%.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Reference-Based Prosody and Rhythm Evaluation for Spoken Dialogue Systems

Speech-to-speech (S2S) AI agents are advancing rapidly, yet evaluation lacks interpretable speech-native measures for conversational prosody and rhythm. Because $F_0$, speaking rate, articulation rate, and pausing shift with model-predicted speaker traits and interaction state, pooled human statistics can be poorly calibrated for evaluating a particular output. Using 4000+ hours of dyadic English conversation from the Seamless Interaction dataset, we construct matched reference regimes for $F_0$ mean, $F_0$ expressivity, speech rate, articulation rate, pause ratio, and mean pause duration. We then define a percentile-based evaluation protocol: extract the same metrics from an S2S output waveform, compare them to the closest matched human reference stratum, and report percentile deviations or 5th-95th percentile out-of-regime flags. On held-out human rows, pooled references over-flag state-conditioned $F_0$ expressivity and rhythm, while matched references return flag rates closer to the nominal 10% and make deviation direction interpretable. These outputs serve as behavioral plausibility checks that complement, rather than replace, perceptual and user-centered evaluation.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Clustering Unsupervised Representations as Defense against Poisoning Attacks on Speech Commands Classification System

Poisoning attacks entail attackers intentionally tampering with training data. In this paper, we consider a dirty-label poisoning attack scenario on a speech commands classification system. The threat model assumes that certain utterances from one of the classes (source class) are poisoned by superimposing a trigger on it, and its label is changed to another class selected by the attacker (target class). We propose a filtering defense against such an attack. First, we use DIstillation with NO labels (DINO) to learn unsupervised representations for all the training examples. Next, we use K-means and LDA to cluster these representations. Finally, we keep the utterances with the most repeated label in their cluster for training and discard the rest. For a 10% poisoned source class, we demonstrate a drop in attack success rate from 99.75% to 0.25%. We test our defense against a variety of threat models, including different target and source classes, as well as trigger variations.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2026

StanceBench: A Benchmark for Audio LLM-Based Interpersonal Stance Evaluation from Speech

Speech-to-speech dialogue models increasingly depend on prosody and interactional nuance to convey social intent, yet benchmarks for these cues remain limited. We introduce StanceBench, a benchmark for measuring interpersonal stance in conversational speech and evaluating audio-capable LLMs as automated judges. Using the Seamless Interaction corpus, StanceBench (1) specifies 9 stance dimensions via role-prompt poles, (2) standardizes single-speaker and interaction-based evaluations, and (3) reports LLM-as-a-judge robustness, bias, and stance inference. Across evaluated stances, empathy and politeness are the easiest. Warmth and assertiveness are moderately separable with positivity skew/asymmetry. Honesty is the hardest and shows high prompt order bias, consistent with needing cross-turn evidence. Attentiveness is separable but aligns weakly with humans. Interaction stances are more context-sensitive, with threshold gaps and high variance, especially conflict regulation.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Speaker Verification with Speech-Aware LLMs: Evaluation and Augmentation

Speech-aware large language models (LLMs) can accept speech inputs, yet their training objectives largely emphasize linguistic content or specific fields such as emotions or the speaker's gender, leaving it unclear whether they encode speaker identity. First, we propose a model-agnostic scoring protocol that produces continuous verification scores for both API-only and open-weight models, using confidence scores or log-likelihood ratios from the Yes/No token probabilities. Using this protocol, we benchmark recent speech-aware LLMs and observe weak speaker discrimination (EERs above 20% on VoxCeleb1). Second, we introduce a lightweight augmentation that equips an LLM with ASV capability by injecting frozen ECAPA-TDNN speaker embeddings through a learned projection and training only LoRA adapters. On TinyLLaMA-1.1B, the resulting ECAPA-LLM achieves 1.03% EER on VoxCeleb1-E, approaching a dedicated speaker verification system while preserving a natural-language interface.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2026

Where Do Backdoors Live? A Component-Level Analysis of Backdoor Propagation in Speech Language Models

Speech language models (SLMs) are systems of systems: independent components that unite to achieve a common goal. Despite their heterogeneous nature, SLMs are often studied end-to-end; how information flows through the pipeline remains obscure. We investigate this question through the lens of backdoor attacks. We first establish that backdoors can propagate through the SLM, leaving all tasks highly vulnerable. From this, we design a component analysis to discover the role each component takes in backdoor learning. We find that backdoor persistence or erasure is highly dependent on the targeted component. Beyond propagation, we examine how backdoors are encoded in shared multitask embeddings, showing that poisoned samples are not directly separable from benign ones, challenging a common separability assumption used in filtering defenses. Our findings emphasize the need to treat multimodal pipelines as intricate systems with unique vulnerabilities, not solely extensions of unimodal ones.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Beyond Transcripts: Iterative Peer-Editing with Audio Unlocks High-Quality Human Summaries of Conversational Speech

There are not enough established benchmarks for the task fo speech summarization. Creating new benchmarks demands human annotation, as LLMs could embed systemic errors and bias into datasets. We test ten annotation workflows varying input modality (audio, transcript, or both) and the inclusion of editing (self or peer-editing) to investigate potential quality tradeoffs from using human annotators to summarize audio. We compare human audio-based summaries to human transcript-based summaries to track the impact of the different information modalities on summary quality. We also compare the human outputs against four LLM benchmarks (three text, one audio) to examine whether human-written summaries are less informative than highly fluent automated outputs. We find that audio-based summaries are less informative and more compressed than transcript summaries. However, iterative peer-editing with audio mitigates this difference, enabling audio-based summaries to be as informative as their transcript counterparts and LLM summaries. These findings validate iterative peer-editing among human annotators for the creation of benchmarks informed by both lexical and prosodic information. This enables crucial dataset collection even in setting where transcripts are unavailable.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

DiT-Flow: Speech Enhancement Robust to Multiple Distortions based on Flow Matching in Latent Space and Diffusion Transformers

Recent advances in generative models, such as diffusion and flow matching, have shown strong performance in audio tasks. However, speech enhancement (SE) models are typically trained on limited datasets and evaluated under narrow conditions, limiting real-world applicability. To address this, we propose DiT-Flow, a flow matching-based SE framework built on the latent Diffusion Transformer (DiT) backbone and trained for robustness across diverse distortions, including noise, reverberation, and compression. DiT-Flow operates on compact variational auto-encoders (VAEs)-derived latent features. We validated our approach on StillSonicSet, a synthetic yet acoustically realistic dataset composed of LibriSpeech, FSD50K, FMA, and 90 Matterport3D scenes. Experiments show that DiT-Flow consistently outperforms state-of-the-art generative SE models, demonstrating the effectiveness of flow matching in multi-condition speech enhancement. Despite ongoing efforts to expand synthetic data realism, a persistent bottleneck in SE is the inevitable mismatch between training and deployment conditions. By integrating LoRA with the MoE framework, we achieve both parameter-efficient and high-performance training for DiT-Flow robust to multiple distortions with using 4.9% percentage of the total parameters to obtain a better performance on five unseen distortions.

eess.AS↗