arXiv subjects

Tianrun Zhao

Publications and source records attributed to Tianrun Zhao.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Quantum Soundness of a Total-Degree Line-versus-Point Test

We prove quantum soundness of the total-degree diagonal line-vs-point test using the individual-degree soundness theorem of Ji, Natarajan, Vidick, Wright, and Yuen. A random change of coordinates yields projective polynomial decoders of total degree at most $md$. The uniform-line slice of the test bounds the weight of outcomes of degree greater than $d$, which are removed by a common relabeling. This reduction does not yield a dimension-independent soundness bound: the $\operatorname{poly}(m)$ dependence of the individual-degree theorem persists, as discussed in Section 1.2 of arXiv:2009.12982.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

The Low-Individual-Degree Test Without the Diagonal-Lines Test Is Not Quantum-Sound

To prove the quantum soundness of the classical low-individual-degree test, the authors of \cite{JNVWY20LID} defined three subtests, namely the axis-parallel lines test, the self-consistency test, and the diagonal-lines test. An interesting question is whether the diagonal-lines test can be removed. In this paper, we show that the diagonal-lines test cannot simply be removed without another compatibility mechanism. Consequently, replacing the "conditional linear functions" by "coordinate deletion functions" in the proof of MIP*=RE, as mentioned in \cite{JNVWY20LID}, does not by itself preserve the required soundness. The authors of \cite{JNVWY20LID} found an example that requires the diagonal-lines test when $(m, d, q) = (2, 2, 4)$; we give an example when $(m, d) = (2, 2)$ and $q$ is any odd prime.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

Formalizing CHSH Rigidity in Lean 4

Violation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality certifies genuine quantum correlations. In this work, we formalize in Lean 4 the rigidity theorem -- any strategy achieving near-optimal CHSH value must be locally isometric to the canonical qubit strategy. In the course of formalization, we identified a gap in the argument of McKague, Yang, and Scarani (arXiv:1203.2976).

quant-ph↗