Tiehua Zhang | Search arXiv

arXiv2026

Agentic Visual Generation: From Generative Models to Agentic Control

Visual generation is evolving from generative models used through a single invocation into agentic control processes that can plan, select tools, inspect intermediate synthesized outputs, revise failures, and reuse prior experience. In most existing systems, the controller is an LLM or VLM, while visual generation models serve as tools or executors. However, existing work lacks a consistent criterion for determining when a generation system becomes agentic. Planning depth, tool use, multi-role collaboration, and reinforcement learning are often treated as evidence of agenticity, even though none of them necessarily determines which generation decisions the controller can make. We organize the field according to what the controller can directly control in the generation process. At L1 Conditioning Control, the controller prepares the input to a predetermined generator but does not control which visual operation is executed. At L2 Execution Control, it selects and invokes actual generation, editing, rendering, or other content-modifying operations. At L3 Outcome-Adaptive Control, it observes an intermediate outcome and uses that observation to change a subsequent operation within the current task. At L4 Experience-Adaptive Control, it retains experience from completed tasks and uses that experience to change decisions on future tasks. L0 Fixed Support separately denotes generators, editors, evaluators, reward models, benchmarks, and fixed pipelines without a deployed controller that makes generation-level decisions. These levels describe a progressively broader decision-making scope rather than model size, system complexity, output quality, tool or role count, or training method. Applying this framework across image, video, editing, 3D, world, slide, and user-interface generation reveals how controller capabilities have evolved and how their mechanisms are distributed across levels.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Learning Constraints-Based Adaptive Hypergraph Neural Networks for Solving Vehicle Routing Problems

The application of learning based methods to vehicle routing problems has emerged as a pivotal area of research in combinatorial optimization. These problems are characterized by vast solution spaces and intricate constraints, making traditional approaches such as exact mathematical models or heuristic methods prone to high computational overhead or reliant on the design of complex heuristic operators to achieve optimal or near optimal solutions. Meanwhile, although some recent learning-based methods can produce good performance for VRP with straightforward constraint scenarios, they often fail to effectively handle hard constraints that are common in practice. This study introduces a novel end-to-end framework that combines constraint-oriented hypergraphs with reinforcement learning to address vehicle routing problems. A central innovation of this work is the development of a constraint-oriented dynamic hyperedge reconstruction strategy within an encoder, which significantly enhances hypergraph representation learning. Additionally, the decoder leverages a double-pointer attention mechanism to iteratively generate solutions. The proposed model is trained by incorporating asynchronous parameter updates informed by hypergraph constraints and optimizing a dual loss function comprising constraint loss and policy gradient loss. The experiment results on benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed approach not only eliminates the need for sophisticated heuristic operators but also achieves substantial improvements in solution quality.

cs.LG↗