arXiv subjects

Tim Weninger

Publications and source records attributed to Tim Weninger.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Echo Chambers and Information Brokers on Truth Social: A Study of Network Dynamics and Political Discourse

This study examines the structural dynamics of Truth Social, a politically aligned social media platform, during two major political events: the U.S. Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade and the FBI's search of Mar-a-Lago. Using a large-scale dataset of user interactions based on re-truths (platform-native reposts), we analyze how the network evolves in relation to fragmentation, polarization, and user influence. Our findings reveal a segmented and ideologically homogenous structure dominated by a small number of central figures. Political events prompt temporary consolidation around shared narratives, followed by rapid returns to fragmented, echo-chambered clusters. Centrality metrics highlight the disproportionate role of key influencers, particularly @realDonaldTrump, in shaping visibility and directing discourse. These results contribute to research on alternative platforms, political communication, and online network behavior, demonstrating how infrastructure and community dynamics together reinforce ideological boundaries and limit cross-cutting engagement.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2026

Ephemeral Feeds and Enduring Rituals: RushTok and the Formation of Event-Based Algorithmic Communities

Each August, TikTok's For You page turns the University of Alabama's sorority recruitment into RushTok. We examine RushTok as an event-based algorithmic community: a collective assembled around a bounded offline ritual and sustained by recommendation. Using a mixed-methods survey (n=71) and a reflexive account of creator outreach, we ask who participates, how, and with what stakes. Findings show an ambiguous and entertainment based throughline; many called it a community (51/71) but few claimed membership (11/71). Affiliation centered on creators rather than shared practices, with parasocial attention clustering around a small set of potential new members (PNMs) and returning figures. Higher content exposure tracked with self-identification as a community member; those members commented, followed creators, and engaged across videos. Attempts to interview creators were met with silence or refusals, reflecting community boundary-work despite viral visibility. We outline implications for platform governance, including time-bounded context, graduated visibility, and aftercare.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Echoes in the Algorithm: Analyzing the Fidelity of User Preferences Against Realized Platform Reach

What does popular content look like when platforms withhold the usual cues? On TikTok, users still form impressions about which videos are taking off even when likes and view counts are hidden, delayed, or pushed to the margins of the interface. We study this problem through TokOrNot, a web-based game in which participants compared pairs of TikTok videos and reported (i) which one they preferred and (ii) which one they believed had reached a larger audience. We benchmark these judgments against verified public view counts, which we use as a bounded proxy for realized platform reach. Across 3,513 judgments from 363 participants, participants identified the higher-reach video only modestly above chance (56.75%, 95% CI: 56.01-58.55). Preference aligned with the higher-view video at a similar rate, while preference and prediction matched in 83.48% of trials (95% CI: 83.12-85.95). Performance also varied across content categories. Taken together, these results do not suggest that users can reliably read platform success from content alone. Instead, they point to a looser and more uncertain interpretive process in which reach judgments often track personal taste or other weak heuristics when explicit popularity cues are absent. We discuss the implications for algorithmic literacy and for interface designs that reduce visible metrics without leaving users to infer reach from uneven or idiosyncratic cues alone.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Principled Evaluation with Human Labels: One Rater at a Time and Rater Equivalence

In many classification tasks, there is no definitive ground truth, only human judgments that may disagree. We address two challenges that arise in such settings: (1) how to use human raters to score classifiers, and (2) how to use them for comparison benchmarks. For the first, the common practice is to score classifiers against the majority vote of an evaluation panel of several human raters. We argue that this is not justified when either of two properties fails: objectivity or equanimity. Instead, under a utility model appropriate for such settings, scoring against one rater at a time and averaging the scores across raters is a more principled approach. For the second, we introduce the concept of rater equivalence: the smallest number of human raters whose combined judgment matches the classifier's performance. We provide a provably optimal algorithm for combining benchmark panel labels, and demonstrate the framework through case studies.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Deception and Communication in Autonomous Multi-Agent Systems: An Experimental Study with Among Us

As large language models are deployed as autonomous agents, their capacity for strategic deception raises core questions for coordination, reliability, and safety in multi-goal, multi-agent systems. We study deception and communication in L2LM agents through the social deduction game Among Us, a cooperative-competitive environment. Across 1,100 games, autonomous agents produced over one million tokens of meeting dialogue. Using speech act theory and interpersonal deception theory, we find that all agents rely mainly on directive language, while impostor agents shift slightly toward representative acts such as explanations and denials. Deception appears primarily as equivocation rather than outright lies, increasing under social pressure but rarely improving win rates. Our contributions are a large-scale analysis of role-conditioned deceptive behavior in LLM agents and empirical evidence that current agents favor low-risk ambiguity that is linguistically subtle yet strategically limited, revealing a fundamental tension between truthfulness and utility in autonomous communication.

cs.MA↗

arXiv2026

Evaluating LLMs as Human Surrogates in Controlled Experiments

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate human responses in behavioral research, yet it remains unclear when LLM-generated data support the same experimental inferences as human data. We evaluate this by directly comparing off-the-shelf LLM-generated responses with human responses from a canonical survey experiment on accuracy perception. Each human observation is converted into a structured prompt, and models generate a single 0--10 outcome variable without task-specific training; identical statistical analyses are applied to human and synthetic responses. We find that LLMs reproduce several directional effects observed in humans, but effect magnitudes and moderation patterns vary across models. Off-the-shelf LLMs therefore capture aggregate belief-updating patterns under controlled conditions but do not consistently match human-scale effects, clarifying when LLM-generated data can function as behavioral surrogates.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

AI Credibility Signals Outrank Institutions and Engagement in Shaping News Perception on Social Media

AI-generated content is rapidly becoming a salient component of online information ecosystems, yet its influence on public trust and epistemic judgments remains poorly understood. We present a large-scale mixed-design experiment (N = 1,000) investigating how AI-generated credibility scores affect user perception of political news. Our results reveal that AI feedback significantly moderates partisan bias and institutional distrust, surpassing traditional engagement signals such as likes and shares. These findings demonstrate the persuasive power of generative AI and suggest a need for design strategies that balance epistemic influence with user autonomy.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Cell Instance Segmentation: The Devil Is in the Boundaries

State-of-the-art (SOTA) methods for cell instance segmentation are based on deep learning (DL) semantic segmentation approaches, focusing on distinguishing foreground pixels from background pixels. In order to identify cell instances from foreground pixels (e.g., pixel clustering), most methods decompose instance information into pixel-wise objectives, such as distances to foreground-background boundaries (distance maps), heat gradients with the center point as heat source (heat diffusion maps), and distances from the center point to foreground-background boundaries with fixed angles (star-shaped polygons). However, pixel-wise objectives may lose significant geometric properties of the cell instances, such as shape, curvature, and convexity, which require a collection of pixels to represent. To address this challenge, we present a novel pixel clustering method, called Ceb (for Cell boundaries), to leverage cell boundary features and labels to divide foreground pixels into cell instances. Starting with probability maps generated from semantic segmentation, Ceb first extracts potential foreground-foreground boundaries with a revised Watershed algorithm. For each boundary candidate, a boundary feature representation (called boundary signature) is constructed by sampling pixels from the current foreground-foreground boundary as well as the neighboring background-foreground boundaries. Next, a boundary classifier is used to predict its binary boundary label based on the corresponding boundary signature. Finally, cell instances are obtained by dividing or merging neighboring regions based on the predicted boundary labels. Extensive experiments on six datasets demonstrate that Ceb outperforms existing pixel clustering methods on semantic segmentation probability maps. Moreover, Ceb achieves highly competitive performance compared to SOTA cell instance segmentation methods.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

Simulating Teams with LLM Agents: Interactive 2D Environments for Studying Human-AI Dynamics

Enabling users to create their own simulations offers a powerful way to study team dynamics and performance. We introduce VirTLab, a system that allows researchers and practitioners to design interactive, customizable simulations of team dynamics with LLM-based agents situated in 2D spatial environments. Unlike prior frameworks that restrict scenarios to predefined or static tasks, our approach enables users to build scenarios, assign roles, and observe how agents coordinate, move, and adapt over time. By bridging team cognition behaviors with scalable agent-based modeling, our system provides a testbed for investigating how environments influence coordination, collaboration, and emergent team behaviors. We demonstrate its utility by aligning simulated outcomes with empirical evaluations and a user study, underscoring the importance of customizable environments for advancing research on multi-agent simulations. This work contributes to making simulations accessible to both technical and non-technical users, supporting the design, execution, and analysis of complex multi-agent experiments.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

The Power of Framing: How News Headlines Guide Search Behavior

Search engines play a central role in how people gather information, but subtle cues like headline framing may influence not only what users believe but also how they search. While framing effects on judgment are well documented, their impact on subsequent search behavior is less understood. We conducted a controlled experiment where participants issued queries and selected from headlines filtered by specific linguistic frames. Headline framing significantly shaped follow-up queries: conflict and strategy frames disrupted alignment with prior selections, while episodic frames led to more concrete queries than thematic ones. We also observed modest short-term frame persistence that declined over time. These results suggest that even brief exposure to framing can meaningfully alter the direction of users information-seeking behavior.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

VirtLab: An AI-Powered System for Flexible, Customizable, and Large-scale Team Simulations

Simulating how team members collaborate within complex environments using Agentic AI is a promising approach to explore hypotheses grounded in social science theories and study team behaviors. We introduce VirtLab, a user-friendly, customizable, multi-agent, and scalable team simulation system that enables testing teams with LLM-based agents in spatial and temporal settings. This system addresses the current frameworks' design and technical limitations that do not consider flexible simulation scenarios and spatial settings. VirtLab contains a simulation engine and a web interface that enables both technical and non-technical users to formulate, run, and analyze team simulations without programming. We demonstrate the system's utility by comparing ground truth data with simulated scenarios.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Social and Political Framing in Search Engine Results

Search engines play a crucial role in shaping public discourse by influencing how information is accessed and framed. While prior research has extensively examined various dimensions of search bias -- such as content prioritization, indexical bias, political polarization, and sources of bias -- an important question remains underexplored: how do search engines and ideologically-motivated user queries contribute to bias in search results. This study analyzes the outputs of major search engines using a dataset of political and social topics. The findings reveal that search engines not only prioritize content in ways that reflect underlying biases but also that ideologically-driven user queries exacerbate these biases, resulting in the amplification of specific narratives. Moreover, significant differences were observed across search engines in terms of the sources they prioritize. These results suggest that search engines may play a pivotal role in shaping public perceptions by reinforcing ideological divides, thereby contributing to the broader issue of information polarization.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Digital Gatekeepers: Google's Role in Curating Hashtags and Subreddits

Search engines play a crucial role as digital gatekeepers, shaping the visibility of Web and social media content through algorithmic curation. This study investigates how search engines like Google selectively promotes or suppresses certain hashtags and subreddits, impacting the information users encounter. By comparing search engine results with nonsampled data from Reddit and Twitter/X, we reveal systematic biases in content visibility. Google's algorithms tend to suppress subreddits and hashtags related to sexually explicit material, conspiracy theories, advertisements, and cryptocurrencies, while promoting content associated with higher engagement. These findings suggest that Google's gatekeeping practices influence public discourse by curating the social media narratives available to users.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Learning from Litigation: Graphs and LLMs for Retrieval and Reasoning in eDiscovery

Electronic Discovery (eDiscovery) requires identifying relevant documents from vast collections for legal production requests. While artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) have improved document review efficiency, current methods still struggle with legal entities, citations, and complex legal artifacts. To address these challenges, we introduce DISCOvery Graph (DISCOG), an emerging system that integrates knowledge graphs for enhanced document ranking and classification, augmented by LLM-driven reasoning. DISCOG outperforms strong baselines in F1-score, precision, and recall across both balanced and imbalanced datasets. In real-world deployments, it has reduced litigation-related document review costs by approximately 98\%, demonstrating significant business impact.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

EntGPT: Entity Linking with Generative Large Language Models

Entity Linking in natural language processing seeks to match text entities to their corresponding entries in a dictionary or knowledge base. Traditional approaches rely on contextual models, which can be complex, hard to train, and have limited transferability across different domains. Generative large language models like GPT offer a promising alternative but often underperform with naive prompts. In this study, we introduce EntGPT, employing advanced prompt engineering to enhance EL tasks. Our three-step hard-prompting method (EntGPT-P) significantly boosts the micro-F_1 score by up to 36% over vanilla prompts, achieving competitive performance across 10 datasets without supervised fine-tuning. Additionally, our instruction tuning method (EntGPT-I) improves micro-F_1 scores by 2.1% on average in supervised EL tasks and outperforms several baseline models in six Question Answering tasks. Our methods are compatible with both open-source and proprietary LLMs. All data and code are available on GitHub at https://github.com/yifding/In_Context_EL.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

SCHENO: Measuring Schema vs. Noise in Graphs

Real-world data is typically a noisy manifestation of a core pattern (schema), and the purpose of data mining algorithms is to uncover that pattern, thereby splitting (i.e. decomposing) the data into schema and noise. We introduce SCHENO, a principled evaluation metric for the goodness of a schema-noise decomposition of a graph. SCHENO captures how schematic the schema is, how noisy the noise is, and how well the combination of the two represent the original graph data. We visually demonstrate what this metric prioritizes in small graphs, then show that if SCHENO is used as the fitness function for a simple optimization strategy, we can uncover a wide variety of patterns. Finally, we evaluate several well-known graph mining algorithms with this metric; we find that although they produce patterns, those patterns are not always the best representation of the input data.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2025

Citations and Trust in LLM Generated Responses

Question answering systems are rapidly advancing, but their opaque nature may impact user trust. We explored trust through an anti-monitoring framework, where trust is predicted to be correlated with presence of citations and inversely related to checking citations. We tested this hypothesis with a live question-answering experiment that presented text responses generated using a commercial Chatbot along with varying citations (zero, one, or five), both relevant and random, and recorded if participants checked the citations and their self-reported trust in the generated responses. We found a significant increase in trust when citations were present, a result that held true even when the citations were random; we also found a significant decrease in trust when participants checked the citations. These results highlight the importance of citations in enhancing trust in AI-generated content.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2024

Navigating the Post-API Dilemma | Search Engine Results Pages Present a Biased View of Social Media Data

Recent decisions to discontinue access to social media APIs are having detrimental effects on Internet research and the field of computational social science as a whole. This lack of access to data has been dubbed the Post-API era of Internet research. Fortunately, popular search engines have the means to crawl, capture, and surface social media data on their Search Engine Results Pages (SERP) if provided the proper search query, and may provide a solution to this dilemma. In the present work we ask: does SERP provide a complete and unbiased sample of social media data? Is SERP a viable alternative to direct API-access? To answer these questions, we perform a comparative analysis between (Google) SERP results and nonsampled data from Reddit and Twitter/X. We find that SERP results are highly biased in favor of popular posts; against political, pornographic, and vulgar posts; are more positive in their sentiment; and have large topical gaps. Overall, we conclude that SERP is not a viable alternative to social media API access.

cs.IR↗