Search arXivSearch

arXiv subjects

Ulf-Rainer Fiebig

Publications and source records attributed to Ulf-Rainer Fiebig.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The realization problem for tail correlation functions

For a stochastic process $\{X_t\}_{t \in T}$ with identical one-dimensional margins and upper endpoint $\tau_{\text{up}}$ its tail correlation function (TCF) is defined through $\chi^{(X)}(s,t) = \lim_{\tau \to \tau_{\text{up}}} P(X_s > \tau \,\mid\, X_t > \tau )$. It is a popular bivariate summary measure that has been frequently used in the literature in order to assess tail dependence. In this article, we study its realization problem. We show that the set of all TCFs on $T \times T$ coincides with the set of TCFs stemming from a subclass of max-stable processes and can be completely characterized by a system of affine inequalities. Basic closure properties of the set of TCFs and regularity implications of the continuity of $\chi$ are derived. If $T$ is finite, the set of TCFs on $T \times T$ forms a convex polytope of $\lvert T \rvert \times \lvert T \rvert$ matrices. Several general results reveal its complex geometric structure. Up to $\lvert T \rvert = 6$ a reduced system of necessary and sufficient conditions for being a TCF is determined. None of these conditions will become obsolete as $\lvert T \rvert\geq 3$ grows.

math.PR

Joint Extremal Behavior of Hidden and Observable Time Series with an Application to GARCH Processes

We study the behavior of a real-valued and unobservable process (Y_t) under an extreme event of a related process (X_t) that is observable. Our analysis is motivated by the well-known GARCH model which represents two such sequences, i.e. the observable log returns of an asset as well as the hidden volatility process. Our results complement the findings of Segers (2007) and Smith (1992) for a single time series. We show that under suitable assumptions their concept of a tail chain as a limiting process is also applicable to our setting. Furthermore, we discuss existence and uniqueness of a limiting process under some weaker assumptions. Finally, we apply our results to the GARCH(1,1) case.

math.PR