arXiv subjects

Wiktor Zuba

Publications and source records attributed to Wiktor Zuba.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Faster Algorithms for Shortest Unique or Absent Substrings

We revisit two well-known algorithmic problems on strings: computing a shortest unique substring (SUS) and a shortest absent substring (SAS) of a string $S$ of length $n$. Both problems admit folklore $\mathcal{O}(n)$-time solutions using the suffix tree of $S$. However, for small alphabets, this complexity is not necessarily optimal in the word RAM model, where a string of length $n$ over alphabet $[0,\sigma)$ can be stored in $\mathcal{O}(n \log \sigma/\log n)$ space and read in $\mathcal{O}(n \log \sigma/\log n)$ time. We present an $\mathcal{O}(n \log \sigma/\sqrt{\log n})$-time algorithm for computing a SUS of $S$. This algorithm decomposes the problem according to the length and the period of the sought substring and uses several tools and techniques, such as synchronizing sets, the analysis of runs, and wavelet trees, to reduce the computation of a SUS to a simple geometric problem. Further, we adapt this algorithm and combine it with an efficient construction of de Bruijn sequences in order to obtain an $\mathcal{O}(n \log \sigma/\sqrt{\log n})$-time algorithm for computing a SAS of $S$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Variations on the Problem of Identifying Spectrum-Preserving String Sets

In computational genomics, many analyses rely on efficient storage and traversal of $k$-mers, motivating compact representations such as spectrum-preserving string sets (SPSS), which store strings whose $k$-mer spectrum matches that of the input. Existing approaches, including Unitigs, Eulertigs and Matchtigs, model this task as a path cover problem on the deBruijn graph. We extend this framework from paths to branching structures by introducing necklace covers, which combine cycles and tree-like attachments (pendants). We present a greedy algorithm that constructs a necklace cover while guaranteeing, under certain conditions, optimality in the cumulative size of the final representation. Experiments on real genomic datasets indicate that the minimum necklace cover achieves smaller representations than Eulertigs and comparable compression to the Masked Superstrings approach, while maintaining exactness of the $k$-mer spectrum.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Subsequence Covers of Words

We introduce subsequence covers (s-covers, in short), a new type of covers of a word. A word $C$ is an s-cover of a word $S$ if the occurrences of $C$ in $S$ as subsequences cover all the positions in $S$. The s-covers seem to be computationally much harder than standard covers of words (cf. Apostolico et al., Inf. Process. Lett. 1991), but, on the other hand, much easier than the related shuffle powers (Warmuth and Haussler, J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 1984). We give a linear-time algorithm for testing if a candidate word $C$ is an s-cover of a word $S$ over a polynomially-bounded integer alphabet. We also give an algorithm for finding a shortest s-cover of a word $S$, which in the case of a constant-sized alphabet, also runs in linear time. The words without proper s-cover are called s-primitive. We complement our algorithmic results with explicit lower and an upper bound on the length of a longest s-primitive word. Both bounds are exponential in the size of the alphabet. The upper bound presented here improves the bound given in the conference version of this paper [SPIRE 2022].

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Counting Distinct Square Substrings in Sublinear Time

We show that the number of distinct squares in a packed string of length $n$ over an alphabet of size $\sigma$ can be computed in $O(n/\log_\sigma n)$ time in the word-RAM model. This paper is the first to introduce a sublinear-time algorithm for counting squares in the packed setting. The packed representation of a string of length $n$ over an alphabet of size $\sigma$ is given as a sequence of $O(n/\log_\sigma n)$ machine words in the word-RAM model (a machine word consists of $\omega \ge \log_2 n$ bits). Previously, it was known how to count distinct squares in $O(n)$ time [Gusfield and Stoye, JCSS 2004], even for a string over an integer alphabet [Crochemore et al., TCS 2014; Bannai et al., CPM 2017; Charalampopoulos et al., SPIRE 2020]. We use the techniques for extracting squares from runs described by Crochemore et al. [TCS 2014]. However, the packed model requires novel approaches. We need an $O(n/\log_\sigma n)$-sized representation of all long-period runs (runs with period $\Omega(\log_\sigma n)$) which allows for a sublinear-time counting of the -- potentially linearly-many -- implied squares. The long-period runs with a string period that is periodic itself (called layer runs) are an obstacle, since their number can be $\Omega(n)$. The number of all other long-period runs is $O(n/\log_\sigma n)$ and we can construct an implicit representation of all long-period runs in $O(n/\log_\sigma n)$ time by leveraging the insights of Amir et al. [ESA 2019]. We count squares in layer runs by exploiting combinatorial properties of pyramidally-shaped groups of layer runs. Another difficulty lies in computing the locations of Lyndon roots of runs in packed strings, which is needed for grouping runs that may generate equal squares. To overcome this difficulty, we introduce sparse-Lyndon roots which are based on string synchronizers [Kempa and Kociumaka, STOC 2019].

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Minimizers in Semi-Dynamic Strings

Minimizers sampling is one of the most widely-used mechanisms for sampling strings. Let $S=S[0]\ldots S[n-1]$ be a string over an alphabet $\Sigma$. In addition, let $w\geq 2$ and $k\geq 1$ be two integers and $\rho=(\Sigma^k,\leq)$ be a total order on $\Sigma^k$. The minimizer of window $X=S[i\mathinner{.\,.} i+w+k-2]$ is the smallest position in $[i,i+w-1]$ where the smallest length-$k$ substring of $S[i\mathinner{.\,.} i+w+k-2]$ based on $\rho$ starts. The set of minimizers for all $i\in[0,n-w-k+1]$ is the set $\mathcal{M}_{w,k,\rho}(S)$ of the minimizers of $S$. The set $\mathcal{M}_{w,k,\rho}(S)$ can be computed in $\mathcal{O}(n)$ time. The folklore algorithm for this computation computes the minimizer of every window in $\mathcal{O}(1)$ amortized time using $\mathcal{O}(w)$ working space. It is thus natural to pose the following two questions: Question 1: Can we efficiently support other dynamic updates on the window? Question 2: Can we improve on the $\mathcal{O}(w)$ working space? We answer both questions in the affirmative: 1. We term a string $X$ semi-dynamic when one is allowed to insert or delete a letter at any of its ends. We show a data structure that maintains a semi-dynamic string $X$ and supports minimizer queries in $X$ in $\mathcal{O}(1)$ time with amortized $\mathcal{O}(1)$ time per update operation. 2. We show that this data structure can be modified to occupy strongly sublinear space without increasing the asymptotic complexity of its operations. To the best of our knowledge, this yields the first algorithm for computing $\mathcal{M}_{w,k,\rho}(S)$ in $\mathcal{O}(n)$ time using $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{w})$ working space. We complement our theoretical results with a concrete application and an experimental evaluation.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Scalable Order-Preserving Pattern Mining

Time series are ubiquitous in domains ranging from medicine to marketing and finance. Frequent Pattern Mining (FPM) from a time series has thus received much attention. Recently, it has been studied under the order-preserving (OP) matching relation stating that a match occurs when two time series have the same relative order on their elements. Here, we propose exact, highly scalable algorithms for FPM in the OP setting. Our algorithms employ an OP suffix tree (OPST) as an index to store and query time series efficiently. Unfortunately, there are no practical algorithms for OPST construction. Thus, we first propose a novel and practical $\mathcal{O}(n\sigma\log \sigma)$-time and $\mathcal{O}(n)$-space algorithm for constructing the OPST of a length-$n$ time series over an alphabet of size $\sigma$. We also propose an alternative faster OPST construction algorithm running in $\mathcal{O}(n\log \sigma)$ time using $\mathcal{O}(n)$ space; this algorithm is mainly of theoretical interest. Then, we propose an exact $\mathcal{O}(n)$-time and $\mathcal{O}(n)$-space algorithm for mining all maximal frequent OP patterns, given an OPST. This significantly improves on the state of the art, which takes $\Omega(n^3)$ time in the worst case. We also formalize the notion of closed frequent OP patterns and propose an exact $\mathcal{O}(n)$-time and $\mathcal{O}(n)$-space algorithm for mining all closed frequent OP patterns, given an OPST. We conducted experiments using real-world, multi-million letter time series showing that our $\mathcal{O}(n\sigma \log \sigma)$-time OPST construction algorithm runs in $\mathcal{O}(n)$ time on these datasets despite the $\mathcal{O}(n\sigma \log \sigma)$ bound; that our frequent pattern mining algorithms are up to orders of magnitude faster than the state of the art and natural Apriori-like baselines; and that OP pattern-based clustering is effective.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Elastic-Degenerate String Comparison

An elastic-degenerate (ED) string $T$ is a sequence of $n$ sets $T[1],\ldots,T[n]$ containing $m$ strings in total whose cumulative length is $N$. We call $n$, $m$, and $N$ the length, the cardinality and the size of $T$, respectively. The language of $T$ is defined as $L(T)=\{S_1 \cdots S_n\,:\,S_i \in T[i]$ for all $i\in[1,n]\}$. ED strings have been introduced to represent a set of closely-related DNA sequences, also known as a pangenome. The basic question we investigate here is: Given two ED strings, how fast can we check whether the two languages they represent have a nonempty intersection? We call the underlying problem the ED String Intersection (EDSI) problem.For two ED strings $T_1$ and $T_2$ of lengths $n_1$ and $n_2$, cardinalities $m_1$ and $m_2$, and sizes $N_1$ and $N_2$, respectively, we show the following: - There is no $O((N_1N_2)^{1-\epsilon})$-time algorithm, for any constant $\epsilon>0$, for EDSI even when $T_1$ and $T_2$ are over a binary alphabet, unless the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis is false. - There is no combinatorial $O((N_1+N_2)^{1.2-\epsilon}f(n_1,n_2))$-time algorithm, for any constant $\epsilon>0$ and any function $f$, for EDSI even when $T_1$ and $T_2$ are over a binary alphabet, unless the Boolean Matrix Multiplication conjecture is false. - An $O(N_1\log N_1\log n_1+N_2\log N_2\log n_2)$-time algorithm for outputting a compact (RLE) representation of the intersection language of two unary ED strings. In the case when $T_1$ and $T_2$ are given in a compact representation, we show that the problem is NP-complete. - An $O(N_1m_2+N_2m_1)$-time algorithm for EDSI. - An $\tilde{O}(N_1^{\omega-1}n_2+N_2^{\omega-1}n_1)$-time algorithm for EDSI, where $\omega$ is the exponent of matrix multiplication; the $\tilde{O}$ notation suppresses factors that are polylogarithmic in the input size.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Computing String Covers in Sublinear Time

Let $T$ be a string of length $n$ over an integer alphabet of size $\sigma$. In the word RAM model, $T$ can be represented in $O(n /\log_\sigma n)$ space. We show that a representation of all covers of $T$ can be computed in the optimal $O(n/\log_\sigma n)$ time; in particular, the shortest cover can be computed within this time. We also design an $O(n(\log\sigma + \log \log n)/\log n)$-sized data structure that computes in $O(1)$ time any element of the so-called (shortest) cover array of $T$, that is, the length of the shortest cover of any given prefix of $T$. As a by-product, we describe the structure of cover arrays of Fibonacci strings. On the negative side, we show that the shortest cover of a length-$n$ string cannot be computed using $o(n/\log n)$ operations in the PILLAR model of Charalampopoulos, Kociumaka, and Wellnitz (FOCS 2020).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Space-Efficient Indexes for Uncertain Strings

Strings in the real world are often encoded with some level of uncertainty. In the character-level uncertainty model, an uncertain string $X$ of length $n$ on an alphabet $\Sigma$ is a sequence of $n$ probability distributions over $\Sigma$. Given an uncertain string $X$ and a weight threshold $\frac{1}{z}\in(0,1]$, we say that pattern $P$ occurs in $X$ at position $i$, if the product of probabilities of the letters of $P$ at positions $i,\ldots,i+|P|-1$ is at least $\frac{1}{z}$. While indexing standard strings for online pattern searches can be performed in linear time and space, indexing uncertain strings is much more challenging. Specifically, the state-of-the-art index for uncertain strings has $\mathcal{O}(nz)$ size, requires $\mathcal{O}(nz)$ time and $\mathcal{O}(nz)$ space to be constructed, and answers pattern matching queries in the optimal $\mathcal{O}(m+|\text{Occ}|)$ time, where $m$ is the length of $P$ and $|\text{Occ}|$ is the total number of occurrences of $P$ in $X$. For large $n$ and (moderate) $z$ values, this index is completely impractical to construct, which outweighs the benefit of the supported optimal pattern matching queries. We were thus motivated to design a space-efficient index at the expense of slower yet competitive pattern matching queries. We propose an index of $\mathcal{O}(\frac{nz}{\ell}\log z)$ expected size, which can be constructed using $\mathcal{O}(\frac{nz}{\ell}\log z)$ expected space, and supports very fast pattern matching queries in expectation, for patterns of length $m\geq \ell$. We have implemented and evaluated several versions of our index. The best-performing version of our index is up to two orders of magnitude smaller than the state of the art in terms of both index size and construction space, while offering faster or very competitive query and construction times.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Approximate Circular Pattern Matching under Edit Distance

In the $k$-Edit Circular Pattern Matching ($k$-Edit CPM) problem, we are given a length-$n$ text $T$, a length-$m$ pattern $P$, and a positive integer threshold $k$, and we are to report all starting positions of the substrings of $T$ that are at edit distance at most $k$ from some cyclic rotation of $P$. In the decision version of the problem, we are to check if any such substring exists. Very recently, Charalampopoulos et al. [ESA 2022] presented $O(nk^2)$-time and $O(nk \log^3 k)$-time solutions for the reporting and decision versions of $k$-Edit CPM, respectively. Here, we show that the reporting and decision versions of $k$-Edit CPM can be solved in $O(n+(n/m) k^6)$ time and $O(n+(n/m) k^5 \log^3 k)$ time, respectively, thus obtaining the first algorithms with a complexity of the type $O(n+(n/m) \mathrm{poly}(k))$ for this problem. Notably, our algorithms run in $O(n)$ time when $m=\Omega(k^6)$ and are superior to the previous respective solutions when $m=\omega(k^4)$. We provide a meta-algorithm that yields efficient algorithms in several other interesting settings, such as when the strings are given in a compressed form (as straight-line programs), when the strings are dynamic, or when we have a quantum computer. We obtain our solutions by exploiting the structure of approximate circular occurrences of $P$ in $T$, when $T$ is relatively short w.r.t. $P$. Roughly speaking, either the starting positions of approximate occurrences of rotations of $P$ form $O(k^4)$ intervals that can be computed efficiently, or some rotation of $P$ is almost periodic (is at a small edit distance from a string with small period). Dealing with the almost periodic case is the most technically demanding part of this work; we tackle it using properties of locked fragments (originating from [Cole and Hariharan, SICOMP 2002]).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Elastic-Degenerate String Matching with 1 Error

An elastic-degenerate string is a sequence of $n$ finite sets of strings of total length $N$, introduced to represent a set of related DNA sequences, also known as a pangenome. The ED string matching (EDSM) problem consists in reporting all occurrences of a pattern of length $m$ in an ED text. This problem has recently received some attention by the combinatorial pattern matching community, culminating in an $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(nm^{\omega-1})+\mathcal{O}(N)$-time algorithm [Bernardini et al., SIAM J. Comput. 2022], where $\omega$ denotes the matrix multiplication exponent and the $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\cdot)$ notation suppresses polylog factors. In the $k$-EDSM problem, the approximate version of EDSM, we are asked to report all pattern occurrences with at most $k$ errors. $k$-EDSM can be solved in $\mathcal{O}(k^2mG+kN)$ time, under edit distance, or $\mathcal{O}(kmG+kN)$ time, under Hamming distance, where $G$ denotes the total number of strings in the ED text [Bernardini et al., Theor. Comput. Sci. 2020]. Unfortunately, $G$ is only bounded by $N$, and so even for $k=1$, the existing algorithms run in $\Omega(mN)$ time in the worst case. In this paper we show that $1$-EDSM can be solved in $\mathcal{O}((nm^2 + N)\log m)$ or $\mathcal{O}(nm^3 + N)$ time under edit distance. For the decision version, we present a faster $\mathcal{O}(nm^2\sqrt{\log m} + N\log\log m)$-time algorithm. We also show that $1$-EDSM can be solved in $\mathcal{O}(nm^2 + N\log m)$ time under Hamming distance. Our algorithms for edit distance rely on non-trivial reductions from $1$-EDSM to special instances of classic computational geometry problems (2d rectangle stabbing or 2d range emptiness), which we show how to solve efficiently. In order to obtain an even faster algorithm for Hamming distance, we rely on employing and adapting the $k$-errata trees for indexing with errors [Cole et al., STOC 2004].

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Approximate Circular Pattern Matching

We consider approximate circular pattern matching (CPM, in short) under the Hamming and edit distance, in which we are given a length-$n$ text $T$, a length-$m$ pattern $P$, and a threshold $k>0$, and we are to report all starting positions of fragments of $T$ (called occurrences) that are at distance at most $k$ from some cyclic rotation of $P$. In the decision version of the problem, we are to check if any such occurrence exists. All previous results for approximate CPM were either average-case upper bounds or heuristics, except for the work of Charalampopoulos et al. [CKP$^+$, JCSS'21], who considered only the Hamming distance. For the reporting version of the approximate CPM problem, under the Hamming distance we improve upon the main algorithm of [CKP$^+$, JCSS'21] from ${\cal O}(n+(n/m)\cdot k^4)$ to ${\cal O}(n+(n/m)\cdot k^3)$ time; for the edit distance, we give an ${\cal O}(nk^2)$-time algorithm. We also consider the decision version of the approximate CPM problem. Under the Hamming distance, we obtain an ${\cal O}(n+(n/m)\cdot k^2\log k/\log\log k)$-time algorithm, which nearly matches the algorithm by Chan et al. [CGKKP, STOC'20] for the standard counterpart of the problem. Under the edit distance, the ${\cal O}(nk\log^2 k)$ running time of our algorithm nearly matches the ${\cal O}(nk)$ running time of the Landau-Vishkin algorithm [LV, J. Algorithms'89]. As a stepping stone, we propose an ${\cal O}(nk\log^2 k)$-time algorithm for the Longest Prefix $k'$-Approximate Match problem, proposed by Landau et al. [LMS, SICOMP'98], for all $k'\in \{1,\dots,k\}$. We give a conditional lower bound that suggests a polynomial separation between approximate CPM under the Hamming distance over the binary alphabet and its non-circular counterpart. We also show that a strongly subquadratic-time algorithm for the decision version of approximate CPM under edit distance would refute SETH.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Hardness of Detecting Abelian and Additive Square Factors in Strings

We prove 3SUM-hardness (no strongly subquadratic-time algorithm, assuming the 3SUM conjecture) of several problems related to finding Abelian square and additive square factors in a string. In particular, we conclude conditional optimality of the state-of-the-art algorithms for finding such factors. Overall, we show 3SUM-hardness of (a) detecting an Abelian square factor of an odd half-length, (b) computing centers of all Abelian square factors, (c) detecting an additive square factor in a length-$n$ string of integers of magnitude $n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$, and (d) a problem of computing a double 3-term arithmetic progression (i.e., finding indices $i \ne j$ such that $(x_i+x_j)/2=x_{(i+j)/2}$) in a sequence of integers $x_1,\dots,x_n$ of magnitude $n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. Problem (d) is essentially a convolution version of the AVERAGE problem that was proposed in a manuscript of Erickson. We obtain a conditional lower bound for it with the aid of techniques recently developed by Dudek et al. [STOC 2020]. Problem (d) immediately reduces to problem (c) and is a step in reductions to problems (a) and (b). In conditional lower bounds for problems (a) and (b) we apply an encoding of Amir et al. [ICALP 2014] and extend it using several string gadgets that include arbitrarily long Abelian-square-free strings. Our reductions also imply conditional lower bounds for detecting Abelian squares in strings over a constant-sized alphabet. We also show a subquadratic upper bound in this case, applying a result of Chan and Lewenstein [STOC 2015].

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Internal Quasiperiod Queries

Internal pattern matching requires one to answer queries about factors of a given string. Many results are known on answering internal period queries, asking for the periods of a given factor. In this paper we investigate (for the first time) internal queries asking for covers (also known as quasiperiods) of a given factor. We propose a data structure that answers such queries in $O(\log n \log \log n)$ time for the shortest cover and in $O(\log n (\log \log n)^2)$ time for a representation of all the covers, after $O(n \log n)$ time and space preprocessing.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

The Number of Repetitions in 2D-Strings

The notions of periodicity and repetitions in strings, and hence these of runs and squares, naturally extend to two-dimensional strings. We consider two types of repetitions in 2D-strings: 2D-runs and quartics (quartics are a 2D-version of squares in standard strings). Amir et al. introduced 2D-runs, showed that there are $O(n^3)$ of them in an $n \times n$ 2D-string and presented a simple construction giving a lower bound of $\Omega(n^2)$ for their number (TCS 2020). We make a significant step towards closing the gap between these bounds by showing that the number of 2D-runs in an $n \times n$ 2D-string is $O(n^2 \log^2 n)$. In particular, our bound implies that the $O(n^2\log n + \textsf{output})$ run-time of the algorithm of Amir et al. for computing 2D-runs is also $O(n^2 \log^2 n)$. We expect this result to allow for exploiting 2D-runs algorithmically in the area of 2D pattern matching. A quartic is a 2D-string composed of $2 \times 2$ identical blocks (2D-strings) that was introduced by Apostolico and Brimkov (TCS 2000), where by quartics they meant only primitively rooted quartics, i.e. built of a primitive block. Here our notion of quartics is more general and analogous to that of squares in 1D-strings. Apostolico and Brimkov showed that there are $O(n^2 \log^2 n)$ occurrences of primitively rooted quartics in an $n \times n$ 2D-string and that this bound is attainable. Consequently the number of distinct primitively rooted quartics is $O(n^2 \log^2 n)$. Here, we prove that the number of distinct general quartics is also $O(n^2 \log^2 n)$. This extends the rich combinatorial study of the number of distinct squares in a 1D-string, that was initiated by Fraenkel and Simpson (J. Comb. Theory A 1998), to two dimensions. Finally, we show some algorithmic applications of 2D-runs. (Abstract shortened due to arXiv requirements.)

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Counting Distinct Patterns in Internal Dictionary Matching

We consider the problem of preprocessing a text $T$ of length $n$ and a dictionary $\mathcal{D}$ in order to be able to efficiently answer queries $CountDistinct(i,j)$, that is, given $i$ and $j$ return the number of patterns from $\mathcal{D}$ that occur in the fragment $T[i \mathinner{.\,.} j]$. The dictionary is internal in the sense that each pattern in $\mathcal{D}$ is given as a fragment of $T$. This way, the dictionary takes space proportional to the number of patterns $d=|\mathcal{D}|$ rather than their total length, which could be $\Theta(n\cdot d)$. An $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n+d)$-size data structure that answers $CountDistinct(i,j)$ queries $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$-approximately in $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(1)$ time was recently proposed in a work that introduced internal dictionary matching [ISAAC 2019]. Here we present an $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n+d)$-size data structure that answers $CountDistinct(i,j)$ queries $2$-approximately in $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(1)$ time. Using range queries, for any $m$, we give an $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\min(nd/m,n^2/m^2)+d)$-size data structure that answers $CountDistinct(i,j)$ queries exactly in $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(m)$ time. We also consider the special case when the dictionary consists of all square factors of the string. We design an $\mathcal{O}(n \log^2 n)$-size data structure that allows us to count distinct squares in a text fragment $T[i \mathinner{.\,.} j]$ in $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ time.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2019

Weighted Shortest Common Supersequence Problem Revisited

A weighted string, also known as a position weight matrix, is a sequence of probability distributions over some alphabet. We revisit the Weighted Shortest Common Supersequence (WSCS) problem, introduced by Amir et al. [SPIRE 2011], that is, the SCS problem on weighted strings. In the WSCS problem, we are given two weighted strings $W_1$ and $W_2$ and a threshold $\mathit{Freq}$ on probability, and we are asked to compute the shortest (standard) string $S$ such that both $W_1$ and $W_2$ match subsequences of $S$ (not necessarily the same) with probability at least $\mathit{Freq}$. Amir et al. showed that this problem is NP-complete if the probabilities, including the threshold $\mathit{Freq}$, are represented by their logarithms (encoded in binary). We present an algorithm that solves the WSCS problem for two weighted strings of length $n$ over a constant-sized alphabet in $\mathcal{O}(n^2\sqrt{z} \log{z})$ time. Notably, our upper bound matches known conditional lower bounds stating that the WSCS problem cannot be solved in $\mathcal{O}(n^{2-\varepsilon})$ time or in $\mathcal{O}^*(z^{0.5-\varepsilon})$ time unless there is a breakthrough improving upon long-standing upper bounds for fundamental NP-hard problems (CNF-SAT and Subset Sum, respectively). We also discover a fundamental difference between the WSCS problem and the Weighted Longest Common Subsequence (WLCS) problem, introduced by Amir et al. [JDA 2010]. We show that the WLCS problem cannot be solved in $\mathcal{O}(n^{f(z)})$ time, for any function $f(z)$, unless $\mathrm{P}=\mathrm{NP}$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2019

Circular Pattern Matching with $k$ Mismatches

The $k$-mismatch problem consists in computing the Hamming distance between a pattern $P$ of length $m$ and every length-$m$ substring of a text $T$ of length $n$, if this distance is no more than $k$. In many real-world applications, any cyclic rotation of $P$ is a relevant pattern, and thus one is interested in computing the minimal distance of every length-$m$ substring of $T$ and any cyclic rotation of $P$. This is the circular pattern matching with $k$ mismatches ($k$-CPM) problem. A multitude of papers have been devoted to solving this problem but, to the best of our knowledge, only average-case upper bounds are known. In this paper, we present the first non-trivial worst-case upper bounds for the $k$-CPM problem. Specifically, we show an $O(nk)$-time algorithm and an $O(n+\frac{n}{m}\,k^4)$-time algorithm. The latter algorithm applies in an extended way a technique that was very recently developed for the $k$-mismatch problem [Bringmann et al., SODA 2019]. A preliminary version of this work appeared at FCT 2019. In this version we improve the time complexity of the main algorithm from $O(n+\frac{n}{m}\,k^5)$ to $O(n+\frac{n}{m}\,k^4)$.

cs.DS↗