Search arXivSearch

arXiv subjects

Xiangyang Ji

Publications and source records attributed to Xiangyang Ji.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Real-Time Scene-Adaptive Tone Mapping for High-Dynamic Range Object Detection

High-dynamic-range (HDR) images, with their rich tone and detail reproduction, hold significant potential to enhance computer vision systems, particularly in autonomous driving. However, most neural networks for embedded systems are trained on low-dynamic-range (LDR) inputs and suffer substantial performance degradation when handling high-bit-depth HDR images due to the challenges posed by extreme dynamic ranges. In this paper, we propose a novel tone mapping method that not only bridges the gap between HDR RAW inputs and the LDR sRGB requirements of detection networks but also achieves end-to-end optimization with downstream tasks. Instead of relying on the traditional image signal processing (ISP) pipeline, we introduce neural photometric calibration to regularize dynamic ranges and a scaling-invariant local tone mapping model to preserve image details. In addition, our architecture also supports performance transfer finetuning, enabling efficient adaptation from the LDR sRGB images to the HDR RAW images with minimal cost. The proposed method outperforms traditional tone mapping algorithms and advanced AI-ISP methods in challenging automotive HDR scenes. Moreover, our pipeline achieves real-time processing of 4K high-bit-depth HDR inputs on NVIDIA Jetson platforms.

cs.CV

Scoring, Reasoning, and Selecting the Best! Ensembling Large Language Models via a Peer-Review Process

We propose LLM-PeerReview, an unsupervised LLM Ensemble method that selects the most ideal response from multiple LLM-generated candidates for each query, harnessing the collective wisdom of multiple models with diverse strengths. LLM-PeerReview is built on a novel, peer-review-inspired framework that offers a transparent and interpretable mechanism, while remaining fully unsupervised for flexible adaptability and generalization. Specifically, it operates in three stages: For scoring, we use the emerging LLM-as-a-Judge technique to evaluate each response by reusing multiple LLMs at hand; For reasoning, we can apply a straightforward averaging strategy or a principled graphical model-based truth inference algorithm to aggregate multiple scores to produce a final score for each response; Finally, the highest-scoring response is selected as the best ensemble output. LLM-PeerReview is conceptually simple and empirically powerful. Our results across four datasets show that the two variants of the proposed approach outperform the advanced model Smoothie-Global by 6.9% and 7.3% points, cross diverse task types including factual recall QA, math reasoning, and instruction following. Notably, we also establish a carefully curated benchmark suite for LLM Ensemble, integrating 12 methods across four classic datasets and three task families, all evaluated under a rigorous and consistent protocol. We hope this repository will help researchers reproduce the LLM Ensemble baselines.

cs.CL