arXiv subjects

Xiaopeng Mao

Publications and source records attributed to Xiaopeng Mao.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Wearable ECG Quality Assessment: A Deep Learning and Ambulatory Context-Awareness Approach

This paper presents and evaluates a Deep Learning-based (DL-based) Signal Quality Assessment (SQA) model to distinguish between clean and noisy ambulatory Electrocardiograms (ECG). The model is trained on Copenhagen Center for Health Technology-Contextualized Arrhythmia Database (CACHET-CADB), which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first ambulatory ECG database with both physical and patient-reported contextual data. The model shows stable performance on different databases such as MIT-databases and the latest PyhsioNet/Cinc Challenge 2021 databases. Subsequently, the paper demonstrates how complicated ECG noise can be investigated by the SQA model and the physical contextual data.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Decoding Imagined Speech: A Strictly Subject-Independent Approach Using EEG

Imagined speech decoding from electroencephalography (EEG) has gained increasing attention as a potential communication pathway for individuals with severe motor impairments, yet reported performance often relies on evaluation protocols that do not clearly reflect cross-subject generalization. This study presents a transparent baseline investigation of a multi-class imagined speech EEG dataset under a strictly subject-independent evaluation framework. Two preprocessing and feature extraction pipelines were compared: a time-domain statistical feature approach and a frequency-domain spectral bandpower approach, evaluated using subject-wise cross-validation and trial-level majority voting with a random forest classifier. The spectral pipeline achieved a significantly higher mean trial-wise accuracy than the statistical pipeline (49.03 $\pm$ 4.18% vs. 37.97 $\pm$ 3.79%) for coarse-level classification across subjects. Forward feature selection further indicated that a limited subset of frequency bands captured most of the discriminative information. Overall, this work provides a strong basis for future brain-computer interface studies targeting improved cross-subject generalization in EEG-based imagined speech decoding.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Predicting Transmembrane Protein Topology from 3D Structure

This paper presents a novel approach to infer protein topology using the state-of-the-art graph neural network (GNN), SchNet. The model is trained on the same dataset used to develop the recent DeepTMHMM model with 5-fold cross-validation. Unlike the conventional approaches based on using only the protein sequences or the $α$-carbons as features, we have decoded our classifier in this way, so all atom-level embeddings are used. Without applying any pre-trained weight, the final results have shown great potential that GNNs can be used for topological predictions.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

RAG-based EEG-to-Text Translation Using Deep Learning and LLMs

The decoding of linguistic information from electroencephalography (EEG) signals remains an extremely challenging problem in brain-computer interface (BCI) research. In particular, sentence-level decoding from EEG is difficult due to the low signal-to-noise ratio of these recordings. Previous studies tackling this problem have typically failed to surpass random baseline performance unless teacher forcing is used during the inference phase. In this work, we propose a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)-based sentence-level EEG-to-text decoding pipeline that combines an EEG encoder aligned with semantic sentence embeddings, a vector retrieval stage, and a large language model (LLM) to refine retrieved sentences into coherent output. Experiments are conducted on the Zurich Cognitive Language Processing Corpus (ZuCo) dataset, which contains single-trial EEG recordings collected during silent reading. To evaluate whether the system extracts meaningful information from these EEG signals, the results are compared with a random baseline. In nine subjects, the proposed pipeline outperforms the random baseline, achieving a mean cosine similarity of 0.181 +- 0.022 compared to 0.139 +- 0.029 for the baseline, corresponding to a relative improvement of 30.45%. Statistical analysis further confirms that this improvement is significant, following a strict evaluation workflow where inference is performed without access to ground-truth labels.

cs.AI↗