arXiv subjects

Xinyue Zhang

Publications and source records attributed to Xinyue Zhang.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

RoMa-$Ω$: What Feed-Forward 3D Models Know About Image Matching

Learned image matching has experienced significant progress in recent years, culminating in robust and accurate matchers such as RoMa, whose robustness is often attributed to its use of frozen DINO features. In a parallel development, feed-forward reconstruction models, such as VGGT, have been trained on ever-growing datasets to accurately regress dense 3D point maps and camera poses. The distinction between matchers and feed-forward reconstruction models has become increasingly blurred with the introduction of matching losses in models such as MASt3R and VGGT-$Ω$. This raises a natural question: what do feed-forward 3D models know about image matching? In this work, we answer this question by analyzing three scenarios: (i) zero-shot matching of patch features, (ii) direct matching of 3D point predictions, and (iii) training a full matcher on top of the learned representations. We find that, despite performing poorly in zero-shot matching, especially in later layers, feed-forward reconstruction models provide strong representations for linear probing and full matching pipelines. We further show that, even without any training, their raw predictions alone enable competitive matching, albeit only under moderate viewpoint changes and modality gaps. Based on these insights, we retrain RoMa v2 by replacing its DINO backbone with VGGT-$Ω$. Our resulting model, \ours, outperforms state-of-the-art matchers on a wide range of benchmarks, e.g. +8.1 mAA compared to RoMa v2 on WxBS.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

CMADiff: Cross-Modal Aligned Diffusion for Controllable Protein Generation

AI-assisted protein design has emerged as a critical tool for advancing biotechnology, as deep generative models have demonstrated their reliability in this domain. However, most existing models primarily utilize protein sequence or structural data for training, neglecting the physicochemical properties of proteins.Moreover, they are deficient to control the generation of proteins in intuitive conditions. To address these limitations,we propose CMADiff here, a novel framework that enables controllable protein generation by aligning the physicochemical properties of protein sequences with text-based descriptions through a latent diffusion process. Specifically, CMADiff employs a Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE) to integrate physicochemical features as conditional input, forming a robust latent space that captures biological traits. In this latent space, we apply a conditional diffusion process, which is guided by BioAligner, a contrastive learning-based module that aligns text descriptions with protein features, enabling text-driven control over protein sequence generation. Validated by a series of evaluations including AlphaFold3, the experimental results indicate that CMADiff outperforms protein sequence generation benchmarks and holds strong potential for future applications. The implementation and code are available at https://github.com/HPC-NEAU/PhysChemDiff.

cs.CE↗

arXiv2026

The Struggle Between Continuation and Refusal: A Mechanistic Analysis of the Continuation-Triggered Jailbreak in LLMs

With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), the safety of LLMs has become a critical concern. Despite significant efforts in safety alignment, current LLMs remain vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks. However, the root causes of such vulnerabilities are still poorly understood, necessitating a rigorous investigation into jailbreak mechanisms across both academic and industrial communities. In this work, we focus on a continuation-triggered jailbreak phenomenon, whereby simply relocating a continuation-triggered instruction suffix can substantially increase jailbreak success rates. To uncover the intrinsic mechanisms of this phenomenon, we conduct a comprehensive mechanistic interpretability analysis at the level of attention heads. Through causal interventions and activation scaling, we show that this jailbreak behavior primarily arises from an inherent competition between the model's intrinsic continuation drive and the safety defenses acquired through alignment training. Furthermore, we perform a detailed behavioral analysis of the identified safety-critical attention heads, revealing notable differences in the behaviors of safety heads across different model architectures. Grounded in these mechanistic findings, we propose Head Competition Steering (HCS), a mechanistically grounded inference-time strategy that explicitly leverages the competition between safety heads and continuation heads to suppress harmful generation, and further distill its behavioral signal into a student model via knowledge distillation, achieving inference-time safety improvements without additional computational overhead.

cs.AI↗