Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Yijie Luo

Publications and source records attributed to Yijie Luo.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Photonics-GCCE: group collaborative-competitive evolution multi-agent framework for universal and autonomous optical design

Large language model (LLM)-empowered photonic agents connect natural-language intents to executable solvers, showing significant advantages over conventional optical design approaches. However, current multi-agent frameworks operate within a collaborative paradigm without extrinsic selective pressure, which could inherit shared blind spots, converge prematurely, and fail to accumulate transferable experience for intricate tasks. Here, we introduce a group photonics collaboration-compete evolution (GCCE) framework and its LLM instantiation, termed Photonics-GCCE. Two independent agent groups pursue the same design target and undergo structured competitive evaluation across refractive-index fidelity, fabrication sensitivity, algorithmic adequacy, and physical consistency. Each group comprises a leader and three specialist agents dedicated to materials, optimization, and code validation. Agents refine their skills through competitive evaluation across design rounds. Benchmarking across six device categories against single-agent and multi-agent baselines shows that Photonics-GCCE elevates composite scores into the high 90s, improves fabrication robustness by 15 to 17 points, and reduces solver iterations to roughly 40 rounds. A representative quasi?BIC demonstration achieves a practically fabricable design with a quality factor of 13120. Our results demonstrate Photonics-GCCE as a general-purpose and closed-loop framework for autonomous optical design, capable of producing high-performance, fabrication-ready devices across diverse nanophotonic tasks.

physics.optics↗

AirQA: A Comprehensive QA Dataset for AI Research with Instance-Level Evaluation

The growing volume of academic papers has made it increasingly difficult for researchers to efficiently extract key information. While large language models (LLMs) based agents are capable of automating question answering (QA) workflows for scientific papers, there still lacks a comprehensive and realistic benchmark to evaluate their capabilities. Moreover, training an interactive agent for this specific task is hindered by the shortage of high-quality interaction trajectories. In this work, we propose AirQA, a human-annotated comprehensive paper QA dataset in the field of artificial intelligence (AI), with 13,956 papers and 1,246 questions, that encompasses multi-task, multi-modal and instance-level evaluation. Furthermore, we propose ExTrActor, an automated framework for instruction data synthesis. With three LLM-based agents, ExTrActor can perform example generation and trajectory collection without human intervention. Evaluations of multiple open-source and proprietary models show that most models underperform on AirQA, demonstrating the quality of our dataset. Extensive experiments confirm that ExTrActor consistently improves the multi-turn tool-use capability of small models, enabling them to achieve performance comparable to larger ones.

cs.CL↗

Task-Specific Data Selection for Instruction Tuning via Monosemantic Neuronal Activations

Instruction tuning improves the ability of large language models (LLMs) to follow diverse human instructions, but achieving strong performance on specific target tasks remains challenging. A critical bottleneck is selecting the most relevant data to maximize task-specific performance. Existing data selection approaches include unstable influence-based methods and more stable distribution alignment methods, the latter of which critically rely on the underlying sample representation. In practice, most distribution alignment methods, from shallow features (e.g., BM25) to neural embeddings (e.g., BGE, LLM2Vec), may fail to capture how the model internally processes samples. To bridge this gap, we adopt a model-centric strategy in which each sample is represented by its neuronal activation pattern in the model, directly reflecting internal computation. However, directly using raw neuron activations leads to spurious similarity between unrelated samples due to neuron polysemanticity, where a single neuron may respond to multiple, unrelated concepts. To address this, we employ sparse autoencoders to disentangle polysemantic activations into sparse, monosemantic representations, and introduce a dedicated similarity metric for this space to better identify task-relevant data. Comprehensive experiments across multiple instruction datasets, models, tasks, and selection ratios show that our approach consistently outperforms existing data selection baselines in both stability and task-specific performance.

cs.LG↗