Yishan Du | Search arXiv

arXiv2026

Make it SewSimple: Navigating UK Curriculum and Classroom Practice in Secondary Computing Education with E-textiles

This paper explores the potential of integrating e-textiles as part of the approach to delivering computing in UK secondary schools. As one of the few UK-based exploratory studies of teachers experiences, it investigates how e-textile platforms such as the SewSimple maker kit and the BBC micro:bit can be incorporated into Key Stage 3 computing education (ages 11-14), taking into account both English national curriculum requirements and the realities of classroom practice. Our research question is: How do teachers perceive the potential of including e-textiles as part of computing education in English secondary schools? In summary, our research contributes to secondary computing education in three ways. First, we examine teachers direct, cross-disciplinarity experiences in two participatory design workshops using a newly designed e-textile platform and extend the limited discussion on supporting the BBC micro:bit in e-textile education. Second, we specifically identify opportunities, barriers, and challenges across three dimensions: school planning, national curriculum guidance, and practical e-textile implementation. Third, we offer insights into best practices for supporting maker technology adoption and pedagogical practices within existing institutional structures to maximize students' benefits for secondary school computing education.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Benchmarking Educational LLMs with Analytics: A Case Study on Gender Bias in Feedback

As teachers increasingly turn to GenAI in their educational practice, we need robust methods to benchmark large language models (LLMs) for pedagogical purposes. This article presents an embedding-based benchmarking framework to detect bias in LLMs in the context of formative feedback. Using 600 authentic student essays from the AES 2.0 corpus, we constructed controlled counterfactuals along two dimensions: (i) implicit cues via lexicon-based swaps of gendered terms within essays, and (ii) explicit cues via gendered author background in the prompt. We investigated six representative LLMs (i.e. GPT-5 mini, GPT-4o mini, DeepSeek-R1, DeepSeek-R1-Qwen, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Llama-3-8B). We first quantified the response divergence with cosine and Euclidean distances over sentence embeddings, then assessed significance via permutation tests, and finally, visualised structure using dimensionality reduction. In all models, implicit manipulations reliably induced larger semantic shifts for male-female counterfactuals than for female-male. Only the GPT and Llama models showed sensitivity to explicit gender cues. These findings show that even state-of-the-art LLMs exhibit asymmetric semantic responses to gender substitutions, suggesting persistent gender biases in feedback they provide learners. Qualitative analyses further revealed consistent linguistic differences (e.g., more autonomy-supportive feedback under male cues vs. more controlling feedback under female cues). We discuss implications for fairness auditing of pedagogical GenAI, propose reporting standards for counterfactual evaluation in learning analytics, and outline practical guidance for prompt design and deployment to safeguard equitable feedback.

cs.CL↗