arXiv subjects

Yuanxin Tian

Publications and source records attributed to Yuanxin Tian.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

FocusDrive: Reasoning with Visual Focus for Autonomous Driving

Driving decisions depend on both where to focus and how to act on what is seen. Effective driving reasoning must establish which objects matter, where they are, and how they inform the intended action. Text-based rationales can describe a driving response while leaving its correspondence to specific visual evidence implicit. Visual focus provides a concrete starting point for this connection by identifying what matters in the scene and where it is. We propose FocusDrive, a structured multimodal reasoning framework that organizes end-to-end planning around explicit visual focus. It pairs descriptions of decision-relevant objects with image-patch references, bringing explicit visual focus into the reasoning that generates driving plans and trajectories. We first assess this focus representation through driver gaze prediction, then investigate its role in planning reasoning using driving-focus annotations within existing NAVSIM training scenes. Experiments on W3DA and NAVSIM demonstrate competitive gaze prediction and end-to-end planning performance, with FocusDrive improving over text-based chain-of-thought. These results support visual focus as an effective link between scene understanding and driving action.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

READ: Learning Risk-Informed Fields for End-to-End Autonomous Driving

Autonomous driving requires more than recognizing what is present in a scene: a planner must determine how road structure, surrounding agents, and their motion states should influence a future maneuver. Existing learning-based planners can capture these influences through latent scene features and trajectory decoders, but the relationship between environmental factors and candidate actions often remains implicit. This limits the ability to inspect, diagnose, or refine how scene context affects the safety of a predicted trajectory. Classical safety fields provide an explicit spatial representation of this relationship, but their risk shapes and relative weights are prescribed in advance and do not adapt to each scene. We introduce READ, a framework that learns an explicit, planning-aligned risk representation from complementary geometric and behavioral constraints. READ instantiates this representation as a continuous spatiotemporal field, enabling differentiable queries along candidate trajectories. The learned field connects scene understanding with action selection by encouraging predicted trajectories to align with low-risk regions, while retaining a differentiable interface for trajectory evaluation and refinement. READ integrates with both end-to-end planners and Vision-Language-Action models. Experiments on NAVSIM show consistent gains across matched end-to-end backbones and strong performance in a VLA setting; READ also achieves competitive results on NAVSIM v2. These results establish learned spatial risk as an explicit, adaptable representation for safe planning.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Data-Driven Risk Fields for Safer End-to-End Autonomous Driving

Safety is a fundamental requirement for autonomous driving, yet existing end-to-end driving models still lack explicit risk-aware learning capacities. Existing rule-based risk models provide interpretable safety priors, yet their absolute risk scores depend on handcrafted functions, coefficients, and thresholds. Learning-based risk representations reduce part of this manual design, but their supervision often relies on occupancy-derived labels or heuristic cost values, which may not capture ego-conditioned planning risk. In this paper, we propose DRiF, a data-driven risk-field framework for safer end-to-end autonomous driving. DRiF learns a shared BEV feature with static map segmentation, dynamic risk prediction, and vehicle planning. For dynamic risk learning, DRiF converts rule-based safety priors into pairwise risk labels, and trains the risk field to preserve relative risk ordering instead of regressing handcrafted absolute scores. Experiments on Bench2Drive show that DRiF achieves competitive overall performance, with consistent improvements in driving score, success rate, and collision-related metrics. These results establish relative risk supervision as an effective way to connect explicit safety structure with end-to-end planning. The data and code will be publicly available.

cs.RO↗