arXiv subjects

Yucheng Wang

Publications and source records attributed to Yucheng Wang.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

CogEvol: Towards Efficient and Reliable Learning Environment Generation

We present CogEvol, a family of models trained specifically for Learning Environment Generation: turning a course brief into a finished learning artifact (structured-JSON slides or self-contained interactive HTML pages) in a single pass. Across 220k production requests, CogEvol completes a slide in a median of 17 seconds and an interactive page in 59, replacing minutes-long multi-turn agent scaffolding. Reliability is enforced rather than hoped for: a production-grounded data pipeline turns real failures into 53,687 verified SFT samples, and a hybrid rule-plus-VLM reward drives GRPO-based RL, hardened after we caught and fixed a reward-hacking episode that produced visually convincing but unplayable games. CogEvol-27B scores 83.7 on slide quality and 63.7 on a 500-case interactive-HTML benchmark with 26.9x fewer parameters than flagship coding models, and, in collaboration with the OpenMAIC team, serves their live production traffic. CogEvol-4B is released openly under the Apache 2.0 license at https://github.com/CogEvol/CogEvol-4B; external flagships are measured on the same suites under the identical harness. Scaffold editing cuts interactive-page generation cost by a further ~76%, and the full stack runs on domestic Ascend accelerators at application-level parity with A800 GPUs, lowering the unit cost of AI-native education at scale.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

AutoDRI: Bridging the Semantic Gap for Automated Design Rule Integration in CP-SAT-Based Cell Synthesis under Multi-Patterning

Design-rule integration (DRI) remains a major bottleneck for scalable (Constraint Programming with SAT) CP-SAT-based standard cell synthesis and rapid technology enablement at advanced nodes. It still depends heavily on manual effort and domain expertise. Moreover, existing low-level rule encodings are not expressive enough for emerging constraints such as cut-based rules under multi-patterning technology. This paper presents \textbf{AutoDRI}, a multi-agent framework for automated design-rule integration in standard cell synthesis. AutoDRI combines a geometric semantic library, a standardized conflict-set encoding, a constructive multicolor-cut modeling method, and a feedback-driven multi-agent flow to bridge the semantic gap between natural-language design rules and executable CP-SAT constraints. In the reported experiments, AutoDRI achieves near-perfect rule-integration correctness across 41 cell benchmarks under 10+ complex rules, including colored cut-mask spacing rules, reaching 33/33 correct integrations with Gemini-3-pro and 32/33 with GPT-5.4, while maintaining runtime comparable to manual hard-coding and passing KLayout DRC and Cadence LVS.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2026

The Illusion of $\textit{What If}$: Evaluating the Breakdown of Counterfactual Reasoning in LLMs

Counterfactual reasoning requires models to reason beyond the observed world and explain how altered conditions propagate through downstream consequences. Existing benchmarks largely target bounded settings with fixed variables or single gold outcomes, overlooking open-domain scenarios requiring causal-process evaluation. To this end, we present $\textbf{WhatIfBench}$, a diagnostic benchmark for open-domain, open-form, long-horizon counterfactual causal reasoning, containing 220 what-if questions across STEM, HSS, and Hybrid scenarios. To evaluate free-form responses, we further propose $\textbf{PRISM}$, which first converts each natural-language explanation into a Response-Derived Semantic Causal Graph of events, states, and mechanisms. On top of this graph, PRISM then jointly applies a Process Metric assessing graph-level causal validity and a Rubric Metric assessing answer-level explanatory adequacy. Evaluating six frontier LLMs with this framework, we find that WhatIfBench remains far from saturated: even the strongest model reaches only a 64.62% final score. Further analysis reveals persistent causal gaps, premise drift, and topology fragmentation, suggesting that fluent counterfactual narratives often mask fragile causal processes. The benchmark, code, and evaluation scripts are available at $\href{https://github.com/zju-gt/WhatIfBench}{WhatIfBench}$.

cs.AI↗