arXiv subjects

Zelin Li

Publications and source records attributed to Zelin Li.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Inference-Native Zeroth-Order Optimization

Zeroth-order (ZO) optimization removes backpropagation, but conventional implementations still create candidate states by mutating model weights and materialize updates through the full parameter state. We introduce Inference-Native ZO, which exposes ZO's query semantics and lowers candidate-state evaluation and mutable learning state to abstractions an inference runtime can execute directly. We formulate ZO as programmable gradient acquisition through candidate-state queries. Direction construction, candidate selection, observation, estimation, and update semantics form a query process whose model-facing primitive is candidate evaluation. We formalize the logical queries required by that process as a ProbePlan, leaving physical state realization and scheduling to the backend. Factorized side states, persistent-subspace reuse, lazy updates, and optional LoRA banks reduce state-management cost. The same formulation covers token-scoring/prefill queries and autoregressive generation while inheriting adapter dispatch, quantization, batching, parallelism, and scheduling from the runtime. A multivariate central-limit argument connects factorized perturbations to dense Gaussian ZO as rank grows. On OPT-13B, required inference queries account for 98.2% of an inference-native step at batch 64; in repeated batch-16 measurements, the complete step is 1.019x a matched-query control. State-transition DRAM traffic falls from 146.7 GB under dense mutation to 26 MB with persistent banked state. Packed PyTorch matches vLLM within 2.1% across the tested regimes, attributing the ragged-batch gain to padding elimination and variable-length packing. Foreground inference and ZO probes also execute in the same physical Qwen3-8B batches with zero observed output or objective deviation.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

PropUQ-MAS: Propagation-Aware Uncertainty Quantification for LLM Multi-Agent Systems

LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) solve complex tasks through communication among role-specialized agents. However, inter-agent dependencies introduce reliability risks beyond isolated agent failures. For instance, errors in intermediate messages could be inherited and amplified by downstream agents. Existing uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods mainly target isolated responses or single-agent reasoning, and therefore fail to capture uncertainty propagation in MAS. To this end, we propose PropUQ-MAS, an error propagation-aware UQ framework that represents MAS execution as a communication-structured graph and estimates each step's reliability by combining local uncertainty with uncertainty inherited from upstream messages. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PropUQ-MAS consistently improves UQ in MAS, with average relative gains of +6.10% in AUROC and +47.58% in PRR.

cs.MA↗

arXiv2026

Beyond Truth Discovery: A Two-Stage Framework to Assess the Severity of False Claim during Disasters

False information spreads rapidly on social media during disasters and can undermine emergency response efforts, public trust, and crisis communication. Existing research primarily focuses on determining whether social media posts contain false information, but provides limited insight into the specific false claims embedded within posts and the severity of individual false claims. To address the limitations, we propose a two-stage framework to assess the severity of false claims during disasters. In the first stage, we develop a false claim extraction agent that identifies false claims from multimodal social media posts containing text, images, videos, and links. A subsequent verification step validates extracted claims with supporting evidence. In the second stage, we define false claim severity as the combination of two complementary dimensions: believability, which determines the likelihood that a claim will be believed, and harmfulness, which captures the potential consequences if it is believed. Human annotators assess both dimensions to construct a claim-level severity benchmark using false claims extracted from Reddit posts related to hurricanes and wildfires. Building upon this benchmark, we investigate false claim severity assessment as a human-AI alignment problem, evaluating whether models can reproduce human judgments under a shared evaluation rubric rather than merely predicting severity labels. Experiments on the benchmark show that traditional supervised models exhibit limited alignment with human judgments, whereas Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve substantially stronger performance. Among the evaluated strategies, in-context learning consistently achieves the strongest alignment with human judgments, highlighting the importance of human examples and shared decision criteria for severity assessment.

cs.SI↗