arXiv subjects

Zi Yang Kang

Publications and source records attributed to Zi Yang Kang.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Prices vs. Quantities: Robust Regulation

This paper revisits the classic instrument choice problem in a setting with consumption externalities, through the lens of robust mechanism design. A regulator chooses among all nonlinear pricing schedules to maximize worst-case welfare, knowing the distribution of consumption preferences and the average marginal externality but not the underlying joint distribution. The optimal policy is a quantity control: a floor for positive externalities and a ceiling for negative externalities. Knowing whether individuals with stronger consumption preferences tend to generate larger or smaller marginal externalities can instead make a uniform tax or subsidy optimal. The framework therefore provides a welfare-based rationale for simple forms of price and quantity regulation.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2026

Pareto-Improving Pricing: Why 3 Is Better Than 2

We study the design of priority pricing systems with heterogeneous agents in environments in which improving quality for some agents reduces the average quality that can be provided. Contrary to the equity-efficiency tradeoff emphasized in public debates, we show that under economically natural conditions priority pricing can Pareto-improve on an equal-allocation benchmark. Three priority tiers suffice for such an improvement, combining higher quality for a fee, lower quality with compensation, and an intermediate tier at the benchmark quality; two tiers are never enough. Our results provide a framework for overcoming equity-efficiency tensions in applications such as lane pricing, waiting-line design, public provision, and insurance.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2026

Topping Up and Optimal Redistribution

This paper studies how topping up -- allowing recipients of in-kind transfers to supplement subsidized consumption in a private market -- affects optimal redistribution. Consumers can access a competitive private market, while a social planner offers an alternative nonlinear price schedule. We show that the effect of topping up depends on the correlation between redistributive priority and demand. When the correlation is positive, topping up does not affect the optimal mechanism. When the correlation is negative, topping up weakens screening and reduces redistribution. At the extensive margin, topping up reduces the set of environments in which intervention is optimal. At the intensive margin, topping up weakly reduces both the scope of a free public option and the mass of consumers served, and shifts redistribution away from the consumers with the highest redistributive priority. We characterize the optimal mechanisms and show how topping up changes the comparative statics of optimal redistribution with respect to redistributive priorities.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2024

Optimal In-Kind Redistribution

This paper develops a model of in-kind redistribution where consumers participate in either a private market or a government-designed program, but not both. We characterize when a social planner, seeking to maximize weighted total surplus, can strictly improve upon the laissez-faire outcome. We show that the optimal mechanism consists of three components: a public option, nonlinear subsidies, and laissez-faire consumption. We quantify the resulting distortions and relate them to the correlation between consumer demand and welfare weights. Our findings reveal that while private market access constrains the social planner's ability to redistribute, it also strengthens the rationale for non-market allocations.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2021

Fixed-Price Approximations in Bilateral Trade

We consider the bilateral trade problem, in which two agents trade a single indivisible item. It is known that the only dominant-strategy truthful mechanism is the fixed-price mechanism: given commonly known distributions of the buyer's value $B$ and the seller's value $S$, a price $p$ is offered to both agents and trade occurs if $S \leq p \leq B$. The objective is to maximize either expected welfare $\mathbb{E}[S + (B-S) \mathbf{1}_{S \leq p \leq B}]$ or expected gains from trade $\mathbb{E}[(B-S) \mathbf{1}_{S \leq p \leq B}]$. We improve the approximation ratios for several welfare maximization variants of this problem. When the agents' distributions are identical, we show that the optimal approximation ratio for welfare is $\frac{2+\sqrt{2}}{4}$. With just one prior sample from the common distribution, we show that a $3/4$-approximation to welfare is achievable. When agents' distributions are not required to be identical, we show that a previously best-known $(1-1/e)$-approximation can be strictly improved, but $1-1/e$ is optimal if only the seller's distribution is known.

cs.GT↗