Search arXivSearch

arXiv subjects

Ziying Luo

Publications and source records attributed to Ziying Luo.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

MOAE: Multi-Objective Agent Evolution with Pareto-Preserving Search

As LLM-based agents continue to advance, their evaluation has become increasingly multifaceted: a capable agent must not only achieve high task completion accuracy but also perform well in interaction quality, safety, and efficiency, raising a central question: can these objectives be optimized simultaneously? Existing methods have considered multiple objectives, but many collapse heterogeneous measurements into a fixed scalar score. Such scalarization depends on metric normalization and preference weights and may discard candidates that represent useful deployment trade-offs. We introduce Multi-Objective Agent Evolution (MOAE), which organizes iterative in-context refinement as a Pareto-preserving evolutionary search over complete agent rollouts. Given a limited rollout budget, MOAE maintains an empirical archive of non-dominated candidates, uses objective-specific diagnostics to guide offspring generation, and applies constraint-aware selection only at deployment. This separates candidate preservation during search from the preference used to return a final solution. The procedure requires no parameter updates and allows each objective to be replaced by any measurable property, which we instantiate as task performance, trajectory quality, and safety. Experiments on TravelPlanner and AgentDojo show that MOAE consistently improves task performance and trajectory quality while maintaining strong safety under matched rollout budgets. Search-behavior analysis further shows that Pareto preservation expands the attainable objective region and increases the frequency of joint improvement. These results demonstrate the potential of Pareto-preserving in-context evolution for optimizing multiple agent properties without committing to a fixed scalarization during search.

cs.AI

Agentic Pressure: The Endogenous Entropy of Reliable Autonomy

Achieving reliable autonomy in the wild requires agents to sustain continuous operations across long-horizon trajectories. However, as agents navigate these unconstrained settings, they encounter cumulative friction that inherently destabilizes their alignment. In this paper, we identify a distinct non-adversarial phenomenon termed Agentic Pressure. We define this as a kinetic force that spontaneously emerges when the cost of compliance conflicts with the imperative of goal achievement. Unlike static jailbreaks, this pressure is endogenous and arises directly from the dynamics of interaction. We propose a theoretical framework that formalizes Agentic Pressure as the ratio between the required work to overcome environmental friction and the remaining capacity of the agent. Our analysis demonstrates that when this pressure exceeds a critical threshold, agents exhibit safety drift as a mathematically optimal adaptation. Consequently, they often resort to Instrumental Hallucination to rationalize rule violations. Empirical experiments validate this framework and show that aligned agents spontaneously compromise safety to preserve autonomy under high-pressure conditions.

cs.AI

Personalized Treatment Outcome Prediction from Scarce Data via Dual-Channel Knowledge Distillation and Adaptive Fusion

Personalized treatment outcome prediction based on trial data for small-sample and rare patient groups is a critical task in precision medicine. However, the high cost and scarcity of trial data limit the prediction performance. To address this issue, we propose a cross-fidelity knowledge distillation and adaptive fusion network (CFKD-AFN), which leverages abundant but low-fidelity simulation data to enhance the prediction on scarce but high-fidelity trial data. CFKD-AFN incorporates a dual-channel knowledge distillation module to extract complementary knowledge from the low-fidelity model, along with an attention-guided fusion module to adaptively integrate multi-source information. Experiments on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease show that CFKD-AFN reduces the mean squared error by 6.67% ~ 74.55% and the mean absolute percentage error by 1.43% ~ 51.54% compared to the evaluated competing methods and remains robust to varying high-fidelity dataset sizes. Furthermore, we extend the CFKD-AFN framework to an interpretable variant for exploratory analysis of feature-attribution patterns associated with treatment outcomes.

cs.LG