arXiv subjects

Artificial intelligence

Search indexed arXiv papers on artificial intelligence and machine learning, including cs.AI metadata. Follow the original manuscripts for methods, experiments and version history.

Follow this topic with RSS

At least 361 records · Page 20Linked to original sources

arXiv2026

Visualizing Graph-to-Answer Mechanism Recovery in Materials-Science Hypothesis Generation

AI co-scientists can generate fluent materials-science hypotheses, but fluency does not show that an answer preserves a scientifically meaningful mechanism. We present a graph-to-answer mechanism-tracing case study for Graph-PRefLexOR-8B, a Qwen3-8B model adapted to expose distinct stages for brainstorming, graph construction, pattern extraction, and synthesis. We organize semantic backtracking, graph corruption, activation-based recovery measurements, and layer-by-token-region grids into a visual diagnostic workflow for inspecting this pathway. Across 100 open-ended materials-science questions, final answers remain closest to the model's own structured stages, especially synthesis. Under graph corruption, a full sweep over 37 residual-stream checkpoints, the embedding output and 36 transformer blocks, shows little mechanism recovery in the earlier transition region at layers 7--10, recovery instead concentrates in late synthesis and answer-start regions around layers 30 and 36. The workflow is intended to help scientists and model developers identify where a generated hypothesis loses or regains mechanism support before it is passed to downstream experimental planning.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Adversarially Robust Abductive Fusion of Pre-trained Transformer-based Perception Models

Deploying pre-trained perception models in novel environments degrades their accuracy under distributional shift, and assembling them alone does not recover it: combiners such as majority voting trade recall for precision and are brittle to coordinated failures. Prior metacognitive methods learn logical rules that flag a model's errors, but rely on hand-authored domain-knowledge cues (object-size priors, segmentation masks) that do not transfer to genuinely novel scenes. We show that this metacognitive layer can be learned without any domain knowledge by exploiting vector-space geometry: per-model Label Vector Pools (LVP), built from each model's own training embeddings, yield error-detection rules from the geometry of detections relative to training-determined prototypes, reaching parity with domain-knowledge rules to within $0.002$ every F1 on test set. Because the approach remains neurosymbolic, these geometric rules share a single logical framework and can still be complemented by domain knowledge when available. We frame the fusion of multiple imperfect ViT-based detectors as a consistency-based abduction problem solved at test time by an exact Integer Program (IP) and a polynomial-time heuristic. On an aerial-imagery benchmark of 15 weather-shifted test sets and six ViT detectors, our domain-knowledge-free layer matches the strongest majority-vote variant on clean data (within $0.005$ F1) and, unlike every majority-vote baseline, retains its performance under a coordinated label-flipping attack: at a $90\%$ flip rate it averages $0.42$ F1 versus $0.35$ for MV-Plurality (a $22\%$ relative gain) and attains the highest F1 on \emph{every} test set once the flip rate exceeds $0.4$

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Patients-like-me: A Variational LM--GNN Framework for Explainable Clinical Prediction

Language models (LMs) offer strong textual representations for electronic health records (EHRs), but they encode patient sequences in isolation and provide limited explainability. Graph neural networks (GNNs) complement LMs by incorporating inter-patient relationships and enabling reference-patient attribution, yet they rely on high-quality patient representations. We propose Patients-like-me (PLM), a unified LM--GNN framework that integrates local patient semantics with global cohort structure. To train PLM efficiently, we introduce a Variational Expectation-Maximization algorithm that alternates LM and GNN updates under a supervised variational objective. Extensive experiments on MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV show that PLM consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, with improvements generalizing across encoder-only and decoder-only LM backbones. These gains are achieved with only modest additional computational overhead. PLM also provides reference-patient explanations by retrieving influential similar patients, while edge-masking experiments confirm that the highest-ranked references have the greatest impact on model predictions.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

MatrAIx: Simulating the World with 8.3 Billion Persona Agents

Human evaluation of AI systems and digital products is costly, slow, and difficult to scale. Offline evaluations are more scalable but often abstract away human diversity and interactive behavior. We therefore introduce MatrAIx, a population-scale simulated-user evaluation infrastructure for testing AI systems and digital products with heterogeneous users. MatrAIx has three core components: First, Persona 8B contains 8.3 billion persona records represented by 1,290 categorical dimensions. Records are either sampled from a dependency graph that preserves correlated attributes or derived from human-authored profiles. We release a quality-filtered coreset of approximately 1 million personas, comprising 599,847 human-grounded and 400,000 synthetic records. Second, the MatrAIx Playground provides four environments in which diverse users evaluate and interact with digital products: Survey, AI Chatbot, Web, and App. Third, MatrAIx provides 1,010 application tasks spanning more than 25 domains, including Commerce, Software, Finance, and Healthcare. We conducted 18,189 evaluation trials across eight representative tasks. Persona agents were powered by three LLMs: Claude Opus 4.8, GPT 5.5, and Claude Haiku 4.5. The resulting feedback captures how decisions and preferences vary across persona backgrounds, including hesitation after a price increase, willingness to continue after an AI assistant fails, and latency tolerance. We conducted two main validation studies: First, a 400-trial controlled study evaluated persona adherence across ten behavioral attributes and all four environments. The declared behavior was expressed or correctly suppressed in 366 trials (91.5%). Second, human and LLM judges evaluated the extraction quality of human-grounded personas. Overall, MatrAIx provides an end-to-end infrastructure for evaluating AI systems and digital products with diverse simulated human users.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Interoceptive Attention as Dynamic Homeostatic Prioritization in a Foraging Agent

Biological systems must regulate competing needs under limited perceptual bandwidth, where sharpening one estimate costs the capacity to sharpen the others. Any fixed-budget system therefore has to decide where to allocate its perceptual precision. We study this in a foraging agent that must keep several bodily needs satisfied to survive, modelled with active inference. At each step it reads its own body-state beliefs, identifies the most-needed channel, and reallocates a fixed budget of interoceptive precision toward it, so that the same precision-shaped likelihood feeds both belief update and planning. In AffectWorld, a four-channel foraging gridworld, this selective allocation more than doubles learning-phase survival at matched budget against a uniform-precision agent ($0.414$ vs $0.199$ across 11 layouts, $n{=}32$ seeds each, paired cluster-bootstrap $p \leq 10^{-4}$). Two further results sharpen the mechanism. The benefit runs through planning as well as perception, since denying the shaped likelihood to the planner alone removes about half of it. It is also need-aligned, since aiming precision at the least-needed channel does worse than spreading it evenly. The attended channel additionally learns its own dynamics about twice as fast, and stays ahead even at matched observation count, a behavioural trace of the same precision routing, visible in learning speed, not survival.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Hallucinations on the Board: Tool-Augmented Evaluation of LLM Chess Commentary

Superhuman game engines in domains like chess have made expert-level evaluations easily accessible, yet they communicate what is true without the natural-language explanations that make such expertise educationally useful to experts and non-experts alike. Large language models could, in principle, bridge this gap, but they frequently hallucinate due to limited domain-specific knowledge, and standard reference-based or LLM-as-a-judge frameworks cannot reliably detect these errors. In this work, we present ACT-Eval, an evaluation framework that decomposes chess commentary into atomic claims and routes them to engine-supported tools and expert-annotated gold references to assess factual correctness, conceptual coverage, and move-quality judgment. We release a benchmark of 325 position--move pairs spanning pedagogical, tournament, and critical positions, including 125 positions with expert-verified gold atoms and a five-class error taxonomy. Evaluating leading proprietary and open-weight models, we find that factual hallucinations remain pervasive in chess commentary: GPT-5.4 without tools produces incorrect sub-claims 22.0% of the time, while smaller open-weight models exceed 40%. Although tool augmentation substantially improves factual correctness and move-quality assessment, coverage of expert strategic and tactical ideas remains limited across all models. Human calibration shows that ACT-Eval's factual judgments fall within the observed range of inter-human agreement, while its coverage scores correlate strongly with human assessments of strategic completeness.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Strategic Evaluation of Planning Strategies for LLM Agents in Cyber-Physical Systems

Evaluations of LLM planning agents largely ask whether a task succeeds or a declared plan is followed. In strategic cyber-physical systems, a stronger question is whether the planning architecture remains appropriate after autonomous participants respond and physics constrains the outcome. We introduce a controlled, physics-grounded benchmark built around planning-induced control trajectories: the ordered planning operations and directives through which an execution architecture acts on other agents and the physical process. It implements predefined, sequential, hierarchical, and search executors in a smart-grid demand-response system with 40 heterogeneous prosumers and an independently simulated radial feeder. The LLM is bounded to typed policy declaration and short operator messages, while schedule construction, prosumer dynamics, and power flow remain explicit code. The protocol uses paired forced-mode counterfactuals, common random response draws, and event-level deadline feasibility. Three properties follow. Architecture materially changes outcomes: forced search is the oracle in all five baseline seeds. Execution fidelity needs more than mode agreement: objective substitution holds agreement at 1.0 while increasing voltage shortfall by 2.68x. A 144-scenario, 576-episode bank has feasible oracles from three of the four architectures. A prespecified stress-held-out ridge has mean regret 90.7 (95% interval [73.8, 108.6]) and no detectable value over fixed sequential; applying known deadline feasibility before quality prediction cuts regret to 29.0 and improves over fixed sequential by 61.1. An all-feasible ablation does not beat fixed search, localising the remaining challenge to within-feasible quality selection. A five-model extension separates stress-conditioned, state-blind, and invariant declarers; latency tails show that live feasibility should be treated probabilistically.

cs.MA↗

arXiv2026

EA-Graph: Artifact-Anchored Verification Memory for Coding Agents under Upstream Drift

Coding agents increasingly work across sessions, but prose notes can preserve a conclusion without the program state that supported it. After an upstream change, a repository may still build even though earlier verification claims are no longer valid. EA-Graph is an artifact-anchored memory for verification claims. It represents artifacts at sub-path granularity, resolves aliases to leaf definitions, anchors each claim to the content used to establish it, and keeps evidence strength separate from freshness. When replacement content is unavailable, the claim becomes unprovable rather than guessed. EA-Graph is evaluated on generated repositories whose behavior-to-artifact ground truth is known by construction. The task is to classify prior claims as unaffected, affected, or unprovable after value drift, logic drift, and deliberately withheld upstream content. The analysis covers 42 sessions across seven clean worlds, 14 model-world instances, three memory conditions, and two model tiers. In the Haiku round, artifact-anchored memory outscored prose notes and no persistent memory in all seven worlds; each exact paired Wilcoxon comparison yielded p = 0.0156. In the Sonnet round, the anchored condition was perfect, but frequent control ceilings left the preregistered contrasts non-significant. No session fabricated withheld content. These results support a bounded claim: artifact-anchored memory improved the smaller model's provability judgments in this testbed. An exploratory comparison further suggests that structured claim memory may narrow a capability gap by externalizing in-session re-derivation, but it does not establish cross- model equivalence. The study makes no claim about efficiency or repair quality.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

SafeCommit: Certifying When Memory-Grounded Agents May Safely Act

Long-horizon agents increasingly use persistent memory and tools to take actions with external side effects. A central failure mode is premature commitment: an agent acts before resolving whether its memory grounding is stale, conflicting, incomplete, or corrupted. We formalize this problem as safe commitment under memory uncertainty and introduce SafeCommit, a risk controlled layer between agent reasoning and external execution. The layer constructs a calibrated set of plausible latent worlds from memory, observations, tool outputs, provenance, and policy constraints. It permits a side effectful action only when a conformal action certificate shows that the action is safe in every retained world. Otherwise, it selects a low-side-effect probe that targets the worlds blocking certification, or returns a conservative fallback. Under calibrated world coverage, the probability of an unsafe certified commit is at most the target level α; with imperfect world proposal, the bound separates calibration and representation error. A dependency-free controlled simulator illustrates the safety-utility tradeoff and reproduces all reported results with one command. The goal is to offer a concrete approach for deciding not only what an agent should do, but when the available evidence is sufficient to safely do it.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Escaping Python Dependency Hell: A Hybrid Replay-and-Repair Pipeline for Python Dependency Resolution

Dependency conflicts in Python ecosystems arise from incompatible version constraints, missing packages, and undocumented compatibility relationships, causing many real-world code snippets to fail at execution. This paper presents PLLM+, a hybrid dependency-repair pipeline evaluated on the HG2.9K benchmark of 2,891 dependency-failing snippets. PLLM+ prioritizes inexpensive deterministic steps before invoking LLM-based repair: static AST-based interpreter inference, replay of historically successful dependency configurations from the competition-provided solutions database, and live PyPI validation of candidate package versions. When these steps do not resolve a case, the system falls back to a structured LLM-based repair loop with typed error classification and Proposer/Critic agents. On HG2.9K, PLLM+ solves 1,500 out of 2,891 snippets, compared with 1,169 solved by the PLLM baseline. It also reduces average runtime from 368.7 to 71.8 seconds per snippet. Most successful fixes come from replaying known configurations: 1,495 of the 1,500 successful fixes are produced by the solutions database, while the LLM fallback accounts for 5 additional fixes. These results suggest that, in this benchmark setting, deterministic reuse of previously validated dependency configurations is a simple and effective strategy, with LLM-based repair serving as a secondary fallback for cases not covered by prior solutions.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Security in the Fine-Tuning Lifecycle of Large Language Models: Threats, Defenses,Evaluation, and Future Directions

Background: Fine-tuning is central to adapting pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) to downstream tasks, but its reliance on training data, parameter updates, and reusable components opens entry points for attackers. Threats have evolved from data poisoning and weight tampering to agent manipulation and interface exploitation, yet existing reviews lack a unified framework spanning the full fine-tuning lifecycle. Objective: This paper presents a systematic survey of LLM fine-tuning security and establishes a lifecycle-based framework for comparing attacks and defenses, complemented by unified empirical evaluation. Methods: We divide attack and defense mechanisms into three phases by intervention timing: pre-tuning, during-tuning, and post-tuning. Within each phase, strategies are reviewed and contrasted to expose their evolution and limitations. Representative methods are then evaluated under a unified model, hardware, and protocol setup, with cross-phase experiments pairing attacks and defenses from different phases. Results: Attack effectiveness is highly model-dependent and non-monotonic with scale: weight-editing attacks effective on earlier models lose impact on modern open-source LLMs; cross-lingual backdoor transfer, reported as near-perfect at larger scales, fails entirely on tested 1B-4B models; and purely benign samples can compromise safety alignment in instruction-tuned models. Single-phase defenses rarely generalize across phases, and defense effectiveness depends jointly on model architecture and alignment state. Conclusion: We identify key open problems (configuration-robust defense, cross-phase defense composition, and embedding-space attacks beyond behavioral assumptions) and propose concrete future research directions.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Automated Visualization Code Synthesis via Multi-Path Reasoning and Feedback-Driven Optimization

Large Language Models (LLMs) have become a cornerstone for automated visualization code generation, enabling users to create charts through natural language instructions. Despite improvements from techniques like few-shot prompting and query expansion, existing methods often struggle when requests are underspecified in actionable details (e.g., data preprocessing assumptions, solver or library choices, etc.), frequently necessitating manual intervention. To overcome these limitations, we propose VisPath: a Multi-Path Reasoning and Feedback-Driven Optimization Framework for Visualization Code Generation. VisPath handles underspecified queries through structured, multi-stage processing. It begins by using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting to reformulate the initial user input, generating multiple extended queries in parallel to surface alternative plausible concretizations of the request. These queries then generate candidate visualization scripts, which are executed to produce diverse images. By assessing the visual quality and correctness of each output, VisPath generates targeted feedback that is aggregated to synthesize an optimal final result. Extensive experiments on MatPlotBench and Qwen-Agent Code Interpreter Benchmark show that VisPath outperforms state-of-the-art methods, providing a more reliable framework for AI-driven visualization generation.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

Overview of CHIP 2025 Shared Task 2: Discharge Medication Recommendation for Metabolic Diseases Based on Chinese Electronic Health Records

Discharge medication recommendation plays a critical role in ensuring treatment continuity, preventing readmission, and improving long-term management for patients with chronic metabolic diseases. This paper present an overview of the CHIP 2025 Shared Task 2 competition, which aimed to develop state-of-the-art approaches for automatically recommending appro-priate discharge medications using real-world Chinese EHR data. For this task, we constructed CDrugRed, a high-quality dataset consisting of 5,894 de-identified hospitalization records from 3,190 patients in China. This task is challenging due to multi-label nature of medication recommendation, het-erogeneous clinical text, and patient-specific variability in treatment plans. A total of 526 teams registered, with 167 and 95 teams submitting valid results to the Phase A and Phase B leaderboards, respectively. The top-performing team achieved the highest overall performance on the final test set, with a Jaccard score of 0.5102, F1 score of 0.6267, demonstrating the potential of advanced large language model (LLM)-based ensemble systems. These re-sults highlight both the promise and remaining challenges of applying LLMs to medication recommendation in Chinese EHRs. The post-evaluation phase remains open at https://tianchi.aliyun.com/competition/entrance/532411/.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Curiosity-Diffuser: Curiosity Guide Diffusion Models for Reliability

One of the bottlenecks in robotic intelligence is the instability of neural network models. This leads to risks when applying intelligence in the physical world. Specifically, imitation policy based on neural network may generate hallucinations, leading to inaccurate behaviors that impact the safety of real-world applications. To address this issue, this paper proposes the Curiosity-Diffuser, aimed at guiding the conditional diffusion model to generate trajectories with lower curiosity, thereby improving the reliability of policy. The core idea is to use a Random Network Distillation (RND) curiosity module to assess whether the model's behavior aligns with the training data, and then minimize curiosity by classifier guidance diffusion to reduce overgeneralization during inference. Additionally, we propose a computationally efficient metric for evaluating the reliability of the policy, measuring the similarity between the generated behaviors and the training dataset, to facilitate research about reliability learning. Finally, simulations and real-world experiments verify the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed method to a variety of scenarios, showing that Curiosity-Diffuser significantly improves task performance and produces behaviors that are more similar to the training data. The code for this work is available at: github.com/CarlDegio/Curiosity-Diffuser

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Efficient unsupervised domain adaptation via self-supervised vision transformer and synergistic cross-domain alignment

Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) aims to mitigate domain shift, where the distribution of labeled source data differs from that of unlabeled target data. Despite recent advances, existing methods often rely on fine-tuning large backbone models, which leads to high computational cost and limits scalability in resource-constrained environments. This limitation highlights the need for parameter-efficient approaches that maintain strong performance with reduced training complexity. Self-supervised foundation models such as DINOv2 provide highly transferable representations and raise the question of whether effective domain adaptation can be achieved without full fine-tuning. To address this question, we propose Efficient Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (EUDA), a parameter-efficient framework that leverages a frozen DINOv2 backbone as a feature extractor and updates only a lightweight bottleneck and classification head. We also adopt a synergistic domain alignment loss (SDAL), which combines cross-entropy (CE) and maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) to promote both discriminative learning and cross-domain alignment. Experimental results on Office-Home, Office-31, VisDA-2017, and DomainNet demonstrate that EUDA achieves competitive performance across diverse domain complexities, while reducing the number of trainable parameters by 42 to 99.7%. These results show the suitability of the proposed method for resource-constrained and distributed environments.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

ArchiveGPT: A human-centered evaluation of using a vision language model for image cataloguing

The accelerating growth of photographic collections has outpaced manual cataloguing, motivating the use of vision language models (VLMs) to automate metadata generation. This study examines whether Al-generated catalogue descriptions can approximate human-written quality and how generative Al might integrate into cataloguing workflows in archival and museum collections. A VLM (InternVL2) generated catalogue descriptions for photographic prints on labelled cardboard mounts with archaeological content, evaluated by archive and archaeology experts and non-experts in a human-centered, experimental framework. Participants classified descriptions as AI-generated or expert-written, rated quality, and reported willingness to use and trust in AI tools. Classification performance was above chance level, with both groups underestimating their ability to detect Al-generated descriptions. OCR errors and hallucinations limited perceived quality, yet descriptions rated higher in accuracy and usefulness were harder to classify, suggesting that human review is necessary to ensure the accuracy and quality of catalogue descriptions generated by the out-of-the-box model, particularly in specialized domains like archaeological cataloguing. Experts showed lower willingness to adopt AI tools, emphasizing concerns on preservation responsibility over technical performance. These findings advocate for a collaborative approach where AI supports draft generation but remains subordinate to human verification, ensuring alignment with curatorial values (e.g., provenance, transparency). The successful integration of this approach depends not only on technical advancements, such as domain-specific fine-tuning, but even more on establishing trust among professionals, which could both be fostered through a transparent and explainable AI pipeline.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Compass: Optimizing Compound AI Workflows for Dynamic Adaptation

Compound AI is a distributed intelligence approach that represents a unified system orchestrating specialized AI/ML models with engineered software components into AI workflows. Compound AI production deployments must satisfy accuracy, latency, and cost objectives under varying loads. However, many deployments operate on fixed infrastructure where horizontal scaling is not viable. Existing approaches optimize solely for accuracy and do not consider changes in workload conditions. We observe that compound AI systems can switch between configurations to fit infrastructure capacity, trading accuracy for latency based on current load. This requires discovering multiple Pareto-optimal configurations from a combinatorial search space and determining when to switch between them at runtime. We present Compass, a novel framework that enables dynamic configuration switching through offline optimization and online adaptation. Compass consists of three components: COMPASS-V algorithm for configuration discovery, Planner for switching policy derivation, and Elastico Controller for runtime adaptation. COMPASS-V discovers accuracy-feasible configurations using finite-difference guided search and a combination of hill-climbing and lateral expansion. Planner profiles these configurations on target hardware and derives switching policies using a queuing theory based model. Elastico monitors queue depth and switches configurations based on derived thresholds. Across two compound AI workflows, COMPASS-V achieves 100% recall while reducing configuration evaluations by 57.5% on average compared to exhaustive search, with efficiency gains reaching 95.3% at tight accuracy thresholds. Runtime adaptation achieves 90-98% SLO compliance under dynamic load patterns, improving SLO compliance by 71.6% over static high-accuracy baselines, while simultaneously improving accuracy by 3-5% over static fast baselines.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

Crowdsourced Multilingual Speech Intelligibility Testing

With the advent of generative audio features, there is an increasing need for rapid evaluation of their impact on speech intelligibility. Beyond the existing laboratory measures, which are expensive and do not scale well, there has been comparatively little work on crowdsourced assessment of intelligibility. Standards and recommendations are yet to be defined, and publicly available multilingual test materials are lacking. In response to this challenge, we propose an approach for a crowdsourced intelligibility assessment. We detail the test design, the collection and public release of the multilingual speech data, and the results of our early experiments.

eess.AS↗