Search arXiv⌕ Search

subject

cs.CL

cs.CL: explore 1548 source-linked works published from 2024 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Search within this collection

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: arxiv. Collection updated 2026-09-15. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

arXiv2026

Post-Training Language Models for Gold-Medal Performance in Coding Competitions

Competitive programming has become a key test of large language model reasoning, with international competitions such as IOI and ICPC representing its most challenging settings. We present an end-to-end specialization pipeline combining large-scale problem curation, synthetic reasoning traces, supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and reinforcement learning (RL). Using 22,000 curated problems, we train Nemotron-3-Nano-CC (30B-A3B) with SFT and RL and Nemotron-3-Ultra-CC (550B-A55B) with SFT alone. We further introduce GenCorrect, a feedback-driven test-time compute strategy that iteratively generates, evaluates, and refines diverse solutions. On IOI 2025, Nano-CC improves from 130 points to 291 after post-training and to 468 with GenCorrect, exceeding the gold threshold of 438.3 while Ultra-CC reaches 502. Guided by these results, we develop a competition-specific Ultra-CC system and evaluate it prospectively during IOI 2026. Under the same time, internet-access, and submission constraints as human contestants, it scores 535.4 out of 600, exceeding both the gold threshold of 361.12 and the top human score of 498.27. To our knowledge, this is the first AI system to outscore the highest-scoring human contestant on an IOI problem set.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Counterfactual Fairness Audits of Multi-Step Clinical LLM Agents Require a Measured Per-Action Instability Floor

Counterfactual audits are the standard tool for checking whether a clinical agent treats demographically distinct but clinically identical patients differently. They report a flip rate: how often an action changes when only the patient descriptor changes. We show that this quantity is uninterpretable on its own. Re-running an identical condition ten times over sixteen vignettes (same narrative, same descriptor string, nothing varied) moved a clinical agent's action in 8.7% of outcome-vignette cells, and instability was heterogeneous across actions by a factor of eight, from 0.022 for ICU escalation to 0.179 for controlled-substance caution. No demographic contrast in our data was distinguishable from that floor. A second model gives a pooled floor of 6.7% and ranks the six actions almost identically (Spearman 0.94, exact p=0.017), so the floor is not one system's artefact. Majority-vote aggregation over five draws removes 39% of it and then flattens, and a null simulation attributes the residue to heterogeneous per-cell rates, so replication mitigates without eliminating. Any counterfactual fairness estimate reported without a per-action floor beside it therefore cannot be read as evidence of disparity. The measurements were taken with FairMedAgent, an evaluation harness for disparity in the actions of clinical LLM agents whose estimand, the within-range counterfactual flip rate, counts only flips between actions a published decision rule admits and a clinician has adjudicated. That estimand requires band adjudication, which is under way; no disparity result is claimed here. Each synthetic vignette runs a six-stage trajectory (five model-facing decisions around a deterministic environment step) under fixed-form conditions spanning race, sex, age, insurance, English proficiency, and their intersections. The harness, the floor protocol, and every analysis script are released.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

RealCADBench: Benchmarking Parametric CAD Modeling from Industrial Design Intents

Parametric computer-aided design (CAD) modeling is difficult to evaluate with a single metric. Existing CAD benchmarks often emphasize synthetic or CAD-native settings, limited input modalities, or executability and IoUs alone. We introduce RealCADBench, a benchmark for intent-to-program CAD modeling from real industrial design intents. It contains 12,632 tasks from 19 factory-automation categories and spans text descriptions, 2D engineering drawings, real product pictures, and rendered images for both Part and Assembly modeling. We report results on a 1,770-task evaluation slice: 1,745 Part tasks across four input regimes and RCB-Assm25, a 25-task assembly study used in every reported assembly comparison. Each method generates FreeCAD API Python, which a shared runtime executes to export the 3D model. We evaluate the exported model using executability, Solid IoU, Surface IoU, and a rubric-based visual-semantic identity Judge. Among the nine standalone frontier large models evaluated, no model leads all four metrics. Across six frontier-scale large models, executability ranges from 0.565 to 0.812, Solid IoU from 0.2841 to 0.5379, and Surface IoU from 0.112 to 0.217 across the four Part regimes. The highest regime-balanced composite comes from a different model than the leaders on the four component metrics. On RCB-Assm25, Codex with GPT-5.5 improves executability and both IoU metrics over standalone GPT-5.5, but lowers the Judge score by 6.98 percentage points, leaving GPT-5.5 as the Judge leader. We also observe recurring failure modes, most notably missing fine structures, loss of part identity, and incorrect assembly placement. These results show that execution alone is insufficient to characterize realistic CAD modeling and that frontier models and agents differ substantially across executability, IoUs, and visual-semantic identity.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

IndicSafeEval: Safety Robustness of Large Language Models under Multilingual Persuasive Jailbreak Attacks

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in multilingual settings, yet their safety is still evaluated primarily in English. This limits our understanding of how alignment failures manifest in low-resource and culturally diverse languages. We introduce IndicSafeEval, a persuasion-based jailbreak evaluation framework for Indian languages. Our benchmark combines ten safety critical content categories with six human-like persuasive strategies across four different Indian languages, such as Hindi, Bengali, Marathi and Punjabi, resulting in 7,200 adversarial prompts. We conduct a systematic black-box evaluation of several open-source LLMs to examine how their safety behaviour varies across languages, persuasion strategies, and risk categories. Our analysis shows that the model does not behave equally safely across all languages and prompt styles. Instead, safety performance depends strongly on both the languages used and the way a request is phrased using persuasive cues. We further observe that different risk categories exhibit different levels of vulnerability, with some types of harmful content being significantly more susceptible to persuasion-based jailbreaks than others. These findings reveal important limitations of current safety evaluations, which are largely English-centric, and underscore the need for multilingual and persuasion-aware benchmarking frameworks to more accurately assess real-world LLM safety. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/MonSaikat/IndicSafeEval. Warning: this paper contains example data that may be offensive or harmful.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

VisCAD: A Foundation Model Suite with Multimodal Industrial CAD Intelligence

AI-assisted computer-aided design (CAD) for industrial products involves two challenging phases. Part-level generation maps diverse forms of user intent, including renders, text descriptions, 2D drawings, and real photographs, to executable programs in a CAD domain-specific language. Assembly-level generation must additionally handle interacting parts, plan mating relations, estimate poses, and place all parts correctly. Existing specialized CAD models are commonly trained on narrow input domains, such as renders or texts, and often generalize poorly, while general-purpose frontier models cover broader inputs but perform inconsistently across CAD domains. We present VisCAD, a foundation model suite designed to provide both broad generalization and strong CAD capability for realistic industrial products. At its core is VisCAD-M1, a 27B model trained through mid-training and post-training for part-level design generation. On PubCADBench and RealCADBench, VisCAD-M1 achieves the highest average part-level score among the evaluated models, reaching 0.5540 compared with 0.5496 for the strongest frontier model. Reusing VisCAD-M1 as a test-time verifier can further raise the score to 0.5797, an approximately 5 percent relative improvement over the previous state of the art. VisCAD also includes a domain-specific harness that leverages frontier models for complex assembly generation and demonstrates advantages over general-purpose harnesses in both quantitative and qualitative evaluations.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Fixed Suffix Dependency Ratio: Quantifying the Dual-Track Mechanism of Gender Assignment in Latvian Loanwords

Existing research has repeatedly observed the tendency for English loanwords to cluster in the masculine gender across different recipient languages, yet the origin of this pattern remains difficult to determine, as fixed morphological rules and default assignments are frequently analysed together. This study proposes the Fixed Suffix Dependency Ratio (FSDR) to quantify the degree of reliance on fixed derivational suffixes across different genders, and to distinguish between morphological anchoring and free-choice in distribution. By examining 1,832 Latvian noun lemma types, the results reveal a significant FSDR asymmetry within the loanword system: feminine loanwords rely significantly more on fixed derivational suffixes, while masculine loanwords are more concentrated in the free-choice zone. This pattern exhibits loanword specificity and has become more pronounced in contemporary usage. FSDR therefore provides a quantitative framework for testing default gender and shows how masculine default can be activated and reinforced under language contact.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Editable Visual Design

While diffusion base models such as GPT-Image-2 and Nano-Banana exhibit remarkable visual expressiveness, their end-to-end generation inherently yields flattened bitmaps with error-prone text, precluding layer-wise post-editing. Conversely, code-based visual generation via Coding Agents provides precise layout control and decoupled layers, yet remains constrained by a lack of global aesthetic intuition and the difficulty of coding complex visual assets. To address this, we propose Editable Visual Design, a new paradigm driven by a Coding Agent. We designate the VLM as the ``creative brain'' for requirement comprehension, task planning, and aesthetic judgment, while utilizing the image generation model as an on-demand ``visual world simulator'' to synthesize standalone visual assets. Operating under an ``imagine first, then act'' closed-loop workflow, the agent generates isolated assets, writes native HTML/CSS, and iteratively refines the design against visual rendering feedback. Furthermore, Agent Design Replay faithfully reproduces the creative and reasoning trajectory akin to that of professional human designers. Ultimately, the system delivers editable artifacts with decoupled layers and real text, enabling users to perform intuitive mouse dragging and layout adjustments on a graphical user interface. Validations on posters, infographics, and other scenarios show that this paradigm successfully achieves both refined aesthetics and production-grade editability.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Sequential Beats Joint: On the Interplay between On-Policy Distillation and RLVR

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) and on-policy distillation (OPD) have emerged as two dominant methods for post-training reasoning LLMs. Prior work uses OPD's dense token-level supervision to complement the sparse RL reward, fusing the two signals within a single step: either as a \emph{weighted-additive combination} or a \emph{teacher-modulated rescaling} of the RL advantage. In this paper, we show that a simple two-stage scheme, OPD-then-RL, consistently outperforms pure OPD, pure RLVR, and all such joint baselines across logic and math reasoning benchmarks. Beyond the empirical results, we further provide a systematic understanding of this through pass@$k$ behavior, learning dynamics, and parameter updates, yielding a consistent explanation: OPD expands the student's coverage of teacher-supported solutions and RL sharpens within that support, while jointly optimizing the two signals causes them to interfere. To provide a practical recipe, we find that the OPD validation score is the key signal for when to switch to RL, and that OPD is a better cold start for RL than SFT. Together, our results establish OPD-then-RL as a simple yet strong way to combine the two methods, turning two entangled signals into complementary stages.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

When Do Internal Probes Beat Reading the Answer? Miscalibrated Readouts and Behavior-Concealed Knowledge in Language Models

A 0.6B language model, asked to verify 1,200 logical conclusions (half valid, half corrupted by a single semantic edit), answers YES every time. Judged by behavior it discriminates nothing; linear probes on its hidden states read the correct verdict at 0.96 AUC, transferring to unseen logical structures and separating foils built from exactly the words of the true conclusion (0.90). We ask where the verdict is lost, and find the dominant failure is a single scalar. The verdict survives to the model's own output logits (margin AUC 0.89) along a well-aligned readout direction; a saturated decision threshold, offset by +4.6 sigma, erases it. The diagnosis generalizes: across 90 semantic-label configurations of a five-model, three-family factorial, behavioral accuracy collapses onto a single function of threshold offset (Spearman -0.93) while margin ranking moves far less. Across a 13x scale range, internal knowledge saturates while free-form behavior is non-monotone: an 8B model underperforms its 4B sibling through an answer-channel failure rather than the threshold; forced-choice accuracy is monotone. The diagnosis is actionable: a one-parameter correction, never fit on evaluated structures, repairs behavior from 50% to 81% (0.6B); calibrated margin decoding recovers 94% at 8B; few-shot prompting works the same way, recentering the threshold (+4.6 sigma to 0.0 sigma) while preserving ranking. Comparing probe to margin separates three regimes: concealed, miscalibrated, and undetected. On a maze task built so foils carry no surface cues, the audit correctly reports the third. In the standard generation setting, answer-surface features and heuristic labels reproduce published probing results without any internal access.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

JLIR: A Julia-Native MLIR-Inspired Intermediate Representation with Automatic JACC Kernel Extraction

The Multi-Level Intermediate Representation (MLIR) has made reusable compiler infrastructure practical for domain-specific computation. However, MLIR's strong compile-time type requirements and low-level (C++) extension model can be a poor match for high-level, dynamically specialized languages such as Julia. MLIR has several drawbacks for dynamic programming languages in terms of the type system and level of abstraction. It is thus extremely challenging for non-compiler or scientific computing users to introduce new programming abstractions and express algorithm implementations in a form that remains both natural and optimizable. As a result, library interfaces for linear algebra, mesh processing, partial differential equations, and related domains often sit outside the compiler optimization path. We present JLIR (Julia-native Level Intermediate Representation), a Julia-native intermediate representation framework that brings the main benefits of MLIR-style multi-level, dialect-oriented compilation into the Julia ecosystem while remaining usable as ordinary Julia code. JLIR represents Julia programs before low-level lowering, supports extensible operations and transformation passes through Julia's language mechanisms, and allows partially typed programs to remain transformable until concrete types are known. The framework includes built-in dialects for arithmetic, control flow, functions, structured loops, and memory operations, and it also includes a lightweight mechanism for adding new domain operations without modifying the core system. To demonstrate JLIR's capabilities, we applied it to automatic Julia for Accelerators (JACC) kernel generation.

cs.PL↗
arXiv2026

PetQA: Benchmarking Veterinary Knowledge and Clinical Reasoning

We introduce PetQA, a Korean long-form question-answering (QA) benchmark for evaluating veterinary knowledge and clinical reasoning in large language models (LLMs) and large vision-language models (LVLMs). PetQA contains 10,076 text-only and 8,751 multimodal QA pairs derived from real-world questions about dogs and cats, paired with answers from expert veterinarians. Its test split, PetQA-Bench, further includes annotations for question types and clinical conditions. We evaluate eighteen models using ROUGE, BERTScore, and LLM-as-a-judge metrics for factuality and helpfulness under three settings: zero-shot inference, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and supervised fine-tuning (SFT). The benchmarking results provide an overview of the strengths and limitations of current models in addressing veterinary clinical queries and highlight the need for more effective adaptation methods to develop clinically reliable AI systems for veterinary care. To facilitate broader use, we additionally provide translated versions of PetQA-Bench in five languages.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Tracing Audio Grounding and Answer Selection in Audio LLMs

Audio Large Language Models (Audio LLMs) have advanced in audio understanding, yet they can still predict the answer by reasoning from textual cues or linguistic priors rather than the provided audio. A common remedy is to train models on data whose answers cannot be inferred from text alone. This approach can improve performance, but what changes within the model remains unclear. In this paper, we ask what must happen inside the model for the audio to actually determine the answer. Our findings are threefold. (1) Replacing the audio with silence or unrelated audio causes substantially larger performance degradation in the trained model than in the pretrained model. (2) Acoustic information most strongly shapes the model's representations of the answer choices in early-to-middle layers, while training mainly increases the influence of audio information on the final prediction in middle-to-late layers. (3) The weights learned during training have their largest impact in specific layer bands. Together, these results provide a mechanistic account of how training strengthens the use of acoustic evidence in Audio LLMs.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Latent-Aligned Reasoning for Multimodal Recommendation

Multimodal Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in cross-modal understanding, yet a fundamental challenge persists when applying them to recommendation: as representations propagate through multi-step reasoning, both visual and textual signals progressively attenuate - a phenomenon we term cross-modal dilution. To address this, we propose LARK (Latent-Aligned Reasoning frameworK), a two-stage latent reasoning framework with complementary alignment mechanisms within a single VLM. In the first stage, learnable latent tokens are interleaved with multi-step chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning and explicitly aligned with a frozen vision encoder, serving as visual checkpoints that preserve perceptual details throughout the reasoning chain. In the second stage, the latent representations are projected via a bridge MLP and trained with item-to-item contrastive learning; to prevent the reasoning semantics from fading, intermediate features are aligned with the CoT hidden states from the first stage, anchoring the final embeddings to the model's own reasoning output. Experiments on three public benchmarks and one industrial dataset show that LARK achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple recommendation architectures, with controlled ablations confirming the distinct contribution of each component.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

CAGE: Coherence-Aware Graph Encoding for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Traditional Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems score each passage independently against the query, assembling context sets that may be individually relevant yet collectively incoherent. We introduce Coherence-Aware Graph Encoding (CAGE), a reranking framework that models "between-chunk coherence" across four dimensions: Intra-Domain Relevance, Noise Resistance, Informational Bonding, and Factual Consistency. Our pipeline transforms retrieved passages into directed heterogeneous entity graphs, amplifies factual anchors via min-out-degree reweighting, encodes structural patterns through a Relational Graph Convolutional Network, and fuses inter-chunk coherence with query relevance for final ranking. Evaluated across four multi-hop benchmarks, CAGE matches or outperforms strong baselines including monoT5 in Recall@5 on bridge-dominated datasets and consistently improves downstream Exact Match, demonstrating that structurally coherent context yields more precise answers even when retrieval recall is comparable or lower.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

ConsensusBench: Benchmark of Consensus Nodes for LLM Reasoning via Outcome Reward Densifying

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become one of the primary paradigms for reasoning enhancement of large language models (LLMs). In particular, Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) and related algorithms have demonstrated strong performance with outcome-level rewards. However, these methods depend solely on the final answer, without feedback regarding which intermediate steps contribute to success or failure. As task complexity and reasoning trajectory length increase, such sparse final-answer rewards become increasingly insufficient. To address this limitation, we introduce ConsensusBench, a novel dataset designed to provide rule-based process-level signals. We posit that a correct final answer relies on a small set of intermediate conclusions throughout the reasoning process, which can be seen as a verifiable sub-outcome. We identify these sub-outcomes by filtering correct trajectories from N rollouts and clustering semantically equivalent intermediate statements. We call these clustered statements as Consensus Nodes. By integrating a rule-based process reward derived from these nodes into GRPO-style algorithms, we develop a new reinforcement learning signal named ConsensusPR. It directly reduces the reward sparsity of outcome reward across long reasoning trajectories. To facilitate systematic process-level evaluation, we introduce three metrics to our benchmark: Final Answer Accuracy (Acc), Node Coverage Rate (NCR), and Tokens per Node (TPN). Experiments across AIME 2024, AIME 2025, GSM8K, MATH-500, and our ConsensusBench demonstrate that the proposed method consistently surpasses GRPO-style approaches, highlighting the practical value of consensus nodes in guiding reasoning.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Choosing the Right Language Mode at Inference Time for Multilingual Reliability

Multilingual large language models often struggle to reason in low- to mid-resource languages. Prior work has shown that translation can improve multilingual reasoning by helping models access stronger English-centric representations. This raises a central question: How much translation is needed for multilingual large language models to reason reliably, and when does more translation instead trigger interference and overconfidence? Using LLaMA and Qwen models, we run extensive experiments varying text scope and language mode (target-only, English-only, bilingual) to evaluate both accuracy and reliability. Our results reveal a clear trade-off: English context often improve understanding and recover errors caused by non-English comprehension, yet adding redundant bilingual context intensifies interference. We address this trade-off with Reliability-Aware Adaptive Inference (RAAI), a training-free test-time framework that (i) performs Expected Calibration Error (ECE)-aware routing and prompt fusion, and (ii) uses a mid-layer Risk Index (RI) to gate sequential reasoning, allocating compute only when it is likely to help and suppressing harmful bilingual redundancy. Across two model families, RAAI enhances accuracy by 25-37.7% on low-resource languages and lowers calibration error by approximately 3-6%, with the most pronounced benefits in the lowest-resource language tiers.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Controlling and Assessing Appropriate Persona Use in LLM-based Dialogue Generation

In persona-based dialogue generation (PDG), LLMs often overuse persona attributes by incorporating them regardless of dialogue context, resulting in unnatural responses. Despite its practical significance, the underlying causes remain unexplored, with no method to mitigate this problem or metric to assess the appropriateness of persona use. To address these issues, we first conduct a comprehensive analysis of LLM-based PDG, revealing that LLMs exhibit a systematic bias to incorporate all given persona attributes, and that existing metrics fail to capture contextual appropriateness. Building on these findings, we propose Self-CONtrastive Persona Overuse Suppression (SCONPOS) to mitigate overuse by directly intervening in LLMs' internal representations at the prompt encoding stage, without requiring any response generation. We further propose the Persona Appropriateness Score (PAS), a novel metric that penalizes both overuse and underuse. Experimental results demonstrate that SCONPOS systematically reduces overuse, and PAS captures the contextual appropriateness of persona use.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Retinal OCTA Phenotyping with LLM Reporting for Alzheimer's Disease

Early identification of Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains challenging because established assessment methods can be costly, resource-intensive, or unsuitable for population-scale screening. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) provides non-invasive visualization of retinal microvasculature, but existing approaches often require diagnostic labels and provide limited measurement-level interpretation. We present an explainable OCTA pipeline that integrates annotation-aware vessel segmentation, layer-specific vascular biomarker extraction, label-free phenotyping, and measurement-grounded LLM reporting. Using 117 ROSE-1 images from 39 subjects, we apply annotation-matched segmentation models to superficial vascular complex (SVC), deep vascular complex (DVC), and combined SVC+DVC representations. The models achieve ROC-AUC values of 0.916-0.970 and Dice scores of 0.695-0.781. Six density and fractal-dimension biomarkers form subject-level profiles for exploratory clustering. Analysis of nine held-out subjects identifies an internally consistent lower-density, lower-fractal-dimension phenotype, although the absence of diagnostic labels prevents clinical interpretation. Reports generated using GPT, Gemini, and Llama are evaluated for measurement grounding, citation faithfulness, and diagnostic caution. Overall, the framework provides a transparent, non-diagnostic connection between retinal vascular measurements, exploratory phenotyping, and evidence-linked interpretation for Alzheimer's research.

cs.CV↗
Compare source metadata on this page
WorkPublishedSource identifierSource
Post-Training Language Models for Gold-Medal Performance in Coding Competitions2026-09-042609.02849arxiv
Counterfactual Fairness Audits of Multi-Step Clinical LLM Agents Require a Measured Per-Action Instability Floor2026-09-042609.03221arxiv
RealCADBench: Benchmarking Parametric CAD Modeling from Industrial Design Intents2026-09-042609.03773arxiv
IndicSafeEval: Safety Robustness of Large Language Models under Multilingual Persuasive Jailbreak Attacks2026-09-042609.03781arxiv
VisCAD: A Foundation Model Suite with Multimodal Industrial CAD Intelligence2026-09-042609.03811arxiv
Fixed Suffix Dependency Ratio: Quantifying the Dual-Track Mechanism of Gender Assignment in Latvian Loanwords2026-09-042609.03930arxiv
Editable Visual Design2026-09-042609.04034arxiv
Sequential Beats Joint: On the Interplay between On-Policy Distillation and RLVR2026-09-042609.04108arxiv
When Do Internal Probes Beat Reading the Answer? Miscalibrated Readouts and Behavior-Concealed Knowledge in Language Models2026-09-042609.04582arxiv
JLIR: A Julia-Native MLIR-Inspired Intermediate Representation with Automatic JACC Kernel Extraction2026-09-042609.04585arxiv
PetQA: Benchmarking Veterinary Knowledge and Clinical Reasoning2026-09-042609.04598arxiv
Tracing Audio Grounding and Answer Selection in Audio LLMs2026-09-042609.04637arxiv
Latent-Aligned Reasoning for Multimodal Recommendation2026-09-042609.04645arxiv
CAGE: Coherence-Aware Graph Encoding for Retrieval-Augmented Generation2026-09-042609.04647arxiv
ConsensusBench: Benchmark of Consensus Nodes for LLM Reasoning via Outcome Reward Densifying2026-09-042609.04648arxiv
Choosing the Right Language Mode at Inference Time for Multilingual Reliability2026-09-042609.04653arxiv
Controlling and Assessing Appropriate Persona Use in LLM-based Dialogue Generation2026-09-042609.04676arxiv
Retinal OCTA Phenotyping with LLM Reporting for Alzheimer's Disease2026-09-042609.04689arxiv

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.