Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 0912.3275

A Formal Framework for Mobile Robot Patrolling in Arbitrary Environments with Adversaries

Abstract

Using mobile robots for autonomous patrolling of environments to prevent intrusions is a topic of increasing practical relevance. One of the most challenging scientific issues is the problem of finding effective patrolling strategies that, at each time point, determine the next moves of the patrollers in order to maximize some objective function. In the very last years this problem has been addressed in a game theoretical fashion, explicitly considering the presence of an adversarial intruder. The general idea is that of modeling a patrolling situation as a game, played by the patrollers and the intruder, and of studying the equilibria of this game to derive effective patrolling strategies. In this paper we present a game theoretical formal framework for the determination of effective patrolling strategies that extends the previous proposals appeared in the literature, by considering environments with arbitrary topology and arbitrary preferences for the agents. The main original contributions of this paper are the formulation of the patrolling game for generic graph environments, an algorithm for finding a deterministic equilibrium strategy, which is a fixed path through the vertices of the graph, and an algorithm for finding a non-deterministic equilibrium strategy, which is a set of probabilities for moving between adjacent vertices of the graph. Both the algorithms are analytically studied and experimentally validated, to assess their properties and efficiency.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nicola Basilico, Nicola Gatti, Francesco Amigoni. 2009-12-16. A Formal Framework for Mobile Robot Patrolling in Arbitrary Environments with Adversaries. https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.3275

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Learning in Structured Stackelberg Games

We initiate the study of structured Stackelberg games, a novel form of strategic interaction between a leader and a follower where contextual information can be predictive of the follower's (unknown) type. Motivated by applications such as security games and AI safety, we show how this additional structure can help the leader learn a utility-maximizing policy in both the online and distributional settings. In the online setting, we first prove that standard learning-theoretic measures of complexity do not characterize the difficulty of the leader's learning task. Notably, we find that there exists a learning-theoretic measure of complexity, analogous to the Littlestone dimension in online classification, that tightly characterizes the leader's instance-optimal regret. We term this the Stackelberg-Littlestone dimension, and leverage it to provide a provably optimal online learning algorithm. In the distributional setting, we provide analogous results by showing that two new dimensions control the sample complexity upper- and lower-bound.

cs.GT

Equilibrium and Infeasibility: A new solution concept for games

Addressing infeasibility in non-cooperative games has become an important topic, as many problems across different applications face this issue. In this paper, we propose a new solution concept for generalized games with possibly infeasible individual constraints. A solution is defined as the limit of a sequence of generalized Nash equilibria induced by games with penalty terms relaxing the individual constraints. Existence is established for a broad range of games and we provide conditions allowing to characterize a $ψ$-penalized solution as a strategy profile maximizing every player's utility over all her penalty minimizing strategies. A variation of Divide-the-Dollar serves as an illustrative example. We further establish the compatibility with the GNE and the solution to the Nash bargaining.

cs.GT

Subgame-Perfect Nash Equilibria of Plurality Voting with Abstention: a PSPACE-Completeness Result for Restricted Ballots

We consider sequential Plurality elections in which each voter may abstain or vote for a single candidate. Each voter assigns utilities to all candidates; for each voter, this induces a (weak) order over the candidates. Ties are resolved uniformly at random, and voting has a small positive cost, so that a voter prefers to abstain when their vote cannot change the election outcome. We consider a variant of this model where, for each voter, we additionally specify a prefix of her ranking, so that she is only allowed to vote for a candidate from that prefix (or abstain). We prove that for this variant of the model, deciding whether a designated candidate is among the election winners in a subgame-perfect equilibrium of the associated extensive-form game is PSPACE-complete. This partially resolves an open problem from the work of Desmedt and Elkind [2010].

cs.GT