A Complexity View of Markets with Social Influence

Xi Chen; Shang-Hua Teng

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1009.0309

A Complexity View of Markets with Social Influence

Xi Chen·Shang-Hua Teng

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, inspired by the work of Megiddo on the formation of preferences and strategic analysis, we consider an early market model studied in the field of economic theory, in which each trader's utility may be influenced by the bundles of goods obtained by her social neighbors. The goal of this paper is to understand and characterize the impact of social influence on the complexity of computing and approximating market equilibria. We present complexity-theoretic and algorithmic results for approximating market equilibria in this model with focus on two concrete influence models based on the traditional linear utility functions. Recall that an Arrow-Debreu market equilibrium in a conventional exchange market with linear utility functions can be computed in polynomial time by convex programming. Our complexity results show that even a bounded-degree, planar influence network can significantly increase the difficulty of equilibrium computation even in markets with only a constant number of goods. Our algorithmic results suggest that finding an approximate equilibrium in markets with hierarchical influence networks might be easier than that in markets with arbitrary neighborhood structures. By demonstrating a simple market with a constant number of goods and a bounded-degree, planar influence graph whose equilibrium is PPAD-hard to approximate, we also provide a counterexample to a common belief, which we refer to as the myth of a constant number of goods, that equilibria in markets with a constant number of goods are easy to compute or easy to approximate.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT cs.CC

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Xi Chen, Shang-Hua Teng. 2010-09-02. A Complexity View of Markets with Social Influence. https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.0309

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗