Physical Processes in the Far and Near Space

Dubovichenko S. B.; Takibaev N. Zh.; Chechin L. M

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1012.1705

Physical Processes in the Far and Near Space

Dubovichenko S. B.·Takibaev N. Zh.·Chechin L. M

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The book examines some of the questions of modern cosmology, the physics of atmospheric phenomena, the physics of quasi-particles and atomic nuclei in the Universe. It consists of three parts, each discusses the theoretical problems of various subjects of cosmic physics. The first part examines the physics of the expanding Universe, with emphasis on the content of the latest revolution in cosmology. It is today well established that the universe is dominated by a vacuum that exceeds the density of baryonic forms of cosmic matter, that the dynamics of the cosmic expansion controls the vacuum antigravity and, finally, that the cosmological expansion is accelerating. In the second part we investigate the processes leading to the electrization of gas fluxes in the solar atmosphere and the generation of neutrons in the active regions of its atmosphere, issues of electrization of thunderstorm clouds in the troposphere of the Earth, the formation and development of noctilucent clouds in the area of the mesosphere. In the third part the methods of calculating the wave functions of cluster systems in continuous and discrete spectrum for a given intercluster interaction are proposed. It presents the theoretical study of astrophysical S-factors in the photonuclear reactions, which are part of the helium thermonuclear processes cycle which determine the bulk of the energy yield in stellar systems. Although the book is written in Russian, it might have some interest.

Explore related subjects

nucl-th

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Dubovichenko S. B., Takibaev N. Zh., Chechin L. M. 2010-12-08. Physical Processes in the Far and Near Space. https://arxiv.org/abs/1012.1705

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Fission Modes and Fragment Shell Structures in $^{258}$Md$^*$ from Six-Dimensional Langevin Calculations

The fission of $^{258}$Md$^*$ is calculated in the excitation energy range of $E^*=6$--36 MeV using a six-dimensional Langevin equation. The calculated events are classified into two symmetric and two asymmetric fission modes based on the fragment mass and the quadrupole deformations of the two fragments at scission. The symmetric modes are separated by their total kinetic energies into the short (high TKE) and superlong (low TKE) modes, whereas the asymmetric modes differ in mass asymmetry. With increasing excitation energy, the yield of the short mode decreases, whereas the combined yield of the two asymmetric modes increases, as observed in the in-beam prompt-fission study of $^{258}$Md$^*$. From an analysis of the fragment shapes and associated single-particle levels, the short mode and the dominant asymmetric mode with the smaller mass asymmetry are found to involve a compact fragment characterized by deformed shell gaps at $Z=52$ and $N=84$, while the complementary fragments have different quadrupole deformations in the two modes.

nucl-th↗

arXiv2026

Classification of fission modes in $^{236}$U using a six-dimensional Langevin approach

Thermal neutron-induced fission of $^{235}$U is studied using a six-dimensional Langevin approach based on the Cassini shape parametrization. Scission events are classified into Asymmetric 1 (AS1), Asymmetric 2 (AS2), and Superlong (SL) fission modes by applying the $k$-means algorithm to the fragment mass and the quadrupole deformations of both fragments. For each mode, proton and neutron single-particle levels are calculated for representative fragments to examine their shell structures. The AS1 heavy fragment exhibits proton gaps at $Z=50$ and 52 and neutron gaps at $N=82$ and 84, whereas well-developed gaps appear at $Z=56$ and $N=88$ in the AS2 heavy fragment. The mass splits of AS1 and AS2 are close to those of the conventional Standard I and Standard II modes, respectively. However, the average total kinetic energy is lower for AS1 than for AS2, opposite to the conventional ordering of Standard I and Standard II. This reversal reflects the more elongated shape of the AS1 light fragment. The SL mode is conventionally interpreted in terms of macroscopic liquid-drop effects, whereas the pronounced proton shell gap at $Z=46$ suggests that proton shell effects also contribute to the elongated symmetric configuration. The classification based on fragment mass and the quadrupole deformations of both fragments provides a basis for distinguishing fission modes and examining the corresponding fragment shell structures at scission.

nucl-th↗

arXiv2026

Gogny interaction from beginnings to current challenges

The main goal of the present review article is to gather for the first time various facets of the phenomenological effective Gogny interaction which was originally proposed in the 70's. This involves both nuclear phenomena of interest that led to its creation and evolution as well as highly technical aspects that led the objectives to be achieved. With this in mind, we propose a discussion structured around four points. After a general introduction, the history and philosophy of the Gogny interaction is exposed. In particular, one highlights an intuitive way of guiding the determination of the parameters of the phenomenological interaction with the results obtained from a realistic interaction using Hartree-Fock calculations and second order corrections and a G-matrix. One also shows that physical phenomena such as pairing or fission were essential to improve the parameterization. The evolution of the original analytical form over the years is also discussed. The second point concern the emulator that was used for the generation of parameterizations. Its modifications, consistent with the evolution of the analytical form, are given. Other fitting procedures, more recent, are also evoked. The third key point is dedicated to the role of the nuclear matter in the fitting process and the acceptance of a parameterization. The objective of the last key point is to highlight some results obtained with the Gogny interaction in nuclear structure, fission and reactions that have allowed to interpret experimental data.

nucl-th↗