Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1108.4197

On functors preserving skeletal maps and skeletally generated compacta

Taras Banakh·Andrzej Kucharski·Marta Martynenko
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A map $f:X\to Y$ between topological spaces is skeletal if the preimage $f^{-1}(A)$ of each nowhere dense subset $A\subset Y$ is nowhere dense in $X$. We prove that a normal functor $F:Comp\to Comp$ is skeletal (which means that $F$ preserves skeletal epimorphisms) if and only if for any open surjective open map $f:X\to Y$ between zero-dimensional compacta with two-element non-degeneracy set $N^f=\{x\in X:|f^{-1}(f(x))|>1\}$ the map $Ff:FX\to FY$ is skeletal. This characterization implies that each open normal functor is skeletal. The converse is not true even for normal functors of finite degree. The other main result of the paper says that each normal functor $F: Comp\to Comp$ preserves the class of skeletally generated compacta. This contrasts with the known Shchepin's result saying that a normal functor is open if and only if it preserves openly generated compacta.

Explore related subjects

math.GNmath.CT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Taras Banakh, Andrzej Kucharski, Marta Martynenko. 2011-11-22. On functors preserving skeletal maps and skeletally generated compacta. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.topol.2012.03.015

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The circle as a topological fractal

We prove that no family of two continuous self-maps witnesses that the circle is a topological fractal, answering a question of Karasová and the present author. Since three maps are known to suffice, this bound is optimal. In contrast, for every $\varepsilon>0$ there are two continuous self-maps of the circle, depending on $\varepsilon$, whose images cover the circle and an integer $N$ such that every composition of $N$ of them has image of diameter less than $\varepsilon$. Thus two maps suffice at any prescribed scale, but no fixed pair works at all scales.

math.GN↗
arXiv2026

Finite-Point Metrizable Coarsenings: Compatible Gauges, Simplicial Metrics, and Hausdorff Lower Bounds

Let $(X,τ)$ be metrizable and let $F=\{a_1,\ldots,a_k\}\subseteq X$, where $2\le k<\infty$. We represent all metrizable topologies $σ\subseteqτ$ agreeing with $τ$ on $X\setminus F$ by compatible systems of continuous gauges $s_i:X\to[0,1]$ with $s_i^{-1}(0)=\{a_i\}$. The condition $\inf_X\max\{s_i,s_j\}>0$ for $i\ne j$ is equivalent to both Hausdorffness and metrizability of the prescribed gauge topology. A normalized product map into the standard simplex gives an explicit metric; its triangle inequality follows from a simplex slack inequality. This metric is complete whenever the auxiliary bounded compatible metric is complete. For two compatible systems, their coordinatewise minimum describes the intersection topology. It is compatible exactly when the two coarsenings have a common Hausdorff lower bound; in that case the intersection is metrizable and is their meet. Otherwise every common lower topology is non-Hausdorff. A closed-discrete construction produces such an obstructed pair for every noncompact metrizable space and every finite exceptional set with at least two points. Consequently, for these exceptional sets, the family is downward directed, or is a lattice, if and only if $(X,τ)$ is compact, in which case it consists only of $τ$.

math.GN↗
arXiv2026

Journey into special $T_1$-spaces

In this survey, we review certain types of special \(T_{1}\) spaces and their associated fixed-point theorems. Kupka introduced the notion of a feeble topological contraction, which naturally generalizes Lipschitz contractions defined on metric spaces. Specifically, Kupka established a fixed-point theorem for feeble topological contractions possessing a closed graph within the product of arbitrary \(T_{0}\) spaces. Furthermore, the \(T_{1}\) separation axiom is shown to guaranty the uniqueness of such fixed points. Finally, we discuss peripheral Hausdorff and locally Hausdorff spaces within the context of these fixed-point results.

math.GN↗