Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 1306.3954

Subgroups of direct products closely approximated by direct sums

Abstract

Let $I$ be an infinite set, $\{G_i:i\in I\}$ be a family of (topological) groups and $G=\prod_{i\in I} G_i$ be its direct product. For $J\subseteq I$, $p_{J}: G\to \prod_{j\in J} G_j$ denotes the projection. We say that a subgroup $H$ of $G$ is: (i) \emph{uniformly controllable} in $G$ provided that for every finite set $J\subseteq I$ there exists a finite set $K\subseteq I$ such that $p_{J}(H)=p_{J}(H\cap\bigoplus_{i\in K} G_i)$; (ii) \emph{controllable} in $G$ provided that $p_{J}(H)=p_{J}(H\cap\bigoplus_{i\in I} G_i)$ for every finite set $J\subseteq I$; (iii) \emph{weakly controllable} in $G$ if $H\cap \bigoplus_{i\in I} G_i$ is dense in $H$, when $G$ is equipped with the Tychonoff product topology. One easily proves that (i)$\to$(ii)$\to$(iii). We thoroughly investigate the question as to when these two arrows can be reversed. We prove that the first arrow can be reversed when $H$ is compact, but the second arrow cannot be reversed even when $H$ is compact. Both arrows can be reversed if all groups $G_i$ are finite. When $G_i=A$ for all $i\in I$, where $A$ is an abelian group, we show that the first arrow can be reversed for {\em all} subgroups $H$ of $G$ if and only if $A$ is finitely generated. Connections with coding theory are highlighted.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maria V. Ferrer, Salvador Hernandez, Dmitri Shakhmatov. 2013-06-17. Subgroups of direct products closely approximated by direct sums. https://doi.org/10.1515/forum-2016-0047

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Periodic Characters and Hamel Coefficients in TVG Topologies on the Real Line

We study topological vector group topologies on the real line generated by Hamel coefficient functions and circle-valued characters. We determine their continuous characters, completions, and isomorphisms, and construct a sequence separating modular convergence from convergence of real-valued observations. We also classify precompact topologies and prove that no greatest nondiscrete topology exists. For the separate problem of a greatest compatible locally quasi-convex topology, we establish transfer and dilation criteria and rule out a family of dyadic counterexample constructions. The existence of a greatest compatible topology remains unresolved.

math.GN↗

Levine Equivalence in Aura Topological Spaces: Reachability, Alexandrov Structure, and Quotient Frames

In this paper, we study Levine equivalence in aura topological spaces. We show that the aura topology is determined by the reachability preorder induced by the scope function and is therefore an Alexandrov topology. We prove that the aura-Levine hull has the explicit representation $K_{\mathfrak a}(A)=\uparrow_{\mathfrak a}A=S_{\mathfrak a}^{\infty}(A)$, and hence two subsets are aura-Levine equivalent if and only if they have the same eventual forward spread. We also describe the quotient structure of the equivalence classes, characterize separation properties through the reachability preorder, classify scope functions that induce the same Levine equivalence, and examine preservation under aura-continuous mappings. For finite aura spaces, we provide an explicit procedure for deciding aura-Levine equivalence using the reflexive-transitive closure of the scope relation.

math.GN↗

An Extension of Galvin's Theorem Related to the Banach-Mazur Game

Let $X$ be a topological space. Galvin's theorem on the Banach-Mazur game states that if $X$ has a $π$-base $\mathcal{B}$ satisfying the following condition: \textit{For any $U \in \mathcal{B}$, there exists a disjoint family $\mathcal{A}_U$ of nonempty open subsets of $U$ such that} \[ |\mathcal{A}_U| \geq |\{ B \in \mathcal{B} : U \subseteq B \}|, \] then, in the Banach-Mazur game on $X$, the second player, denoted NONEMPTY, has a 2-tactic if NONEMPTY has a winning strategy in this game. In this paper, we extend the disjointness condition of this family by replacing it with the condition of being open finite family. With this extension of the family $\mathcal{A}_U$, we showed that, the theorem is also true.

math.GN↗