Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1406.7805

Between countably compact and $ω$-bounded

Abstract

Given a property $P$ of subspaces of a $T_1$ space $X$, we say that $X$ is {\em $P$-bounded} iff every subspace of $X$ with property $P$ has compact closure in $X$. Here we study $P$-bounded spaces for the properties $P \in \{ωD, ωN, C_2 \}$ where $ωD \, \equiv$ "countable discrete", $ωN \, \equiv$ "countable nowhere dense", and $C_2 \,\equiv$ "second countable". Clearly, for each of these $P$-bounded is between countably compact and $ω$-bounded. We give examples in ZFC that separate all these boundedness properties and their appropriate combinations. Consistent separating examples with better properties (such as: smaller cardinality or weight, local compactness, first countability) are also produced. We have interesting results concerning $ωD$-bounded spaces which show that $ωD$-boundedness is much stronger than countable compactness: $\bullet$ Regular $ωD$-bounded spaces of Lindelöf degree $< cov(\mathcal{M})$ are $ω$-bounded. $\bullet$ Regular $ωD$-bounded spaces of countable tightness are $ωN$-bounded, and if $\mathfrak{b} > ω_1$ then even $ω$-bounded. $\bullet$ If a product of Hausdorff space is $ωD$-bounded then all but one of its factors must be $ω$-bounded. $\bullet$ Any product of at most $\mathfrak{t}$ many Hausdorff $ωD$-bounded spaces is countably compact. As a byproduct we obtain that regular, countably tight, and countably compact spaces are discretely generated.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

István Juhász, Lajos Soukup, Zoltán Szentmiklóssy. 2014-06-30. Between countably compact and $ω$-bounded. https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.7805

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The circle as a topological fractal

We prove that no family of two continuous self-maps witnesses that the circle is a topological fractal, answering a question of Karasová and the present author. Since three maps are known to suffice, this bound is optimal. In contrast, for every $\varepsilon>0$ there are two continuous self-maps of the circle, depending on $\varepsilon$, whose images cover the circle and an integer $N$ such that every composition of $N$ of them has image of diameter less than $\varepsilon$. Thus two maps suffice at any prescribed scale, but no fixed pair works at all scales.

math.GN

Finite-Point Metrizable Coarsenings: Compatible Gauges, Simplicial Metrics, and Hausdorff Lower Bounds

Let $(X,τ)$ be metrizable and let $F=\{a_1,\ldots,a_k\}\subseteq X$, where $2\le k<\infty$. We represent all metrizable topologies $σ\subseteqτ$ agreeing with $τ$ on $X\setminus F$ by compatible systems of continuous gauges $s_i:X\to[0,1]$ with $s_i^{-1}(0)=\{a_i\}$. The condition $\inf_X\max\{s_i,s_j\}>0$ for $i\ne j$ is equivalent to both Hausdorffness and metrizability of the prescribed gauge topology. A normalized product map into the standard simplex gives an explicit metric; its triangle inequality follows from a simplex slack inequality. This metric is complete whenever the auxiliary bounded compatible metric is complete. For two compatible systems, their coordinatewise minimum describes the intersection topology. It is compatible exactly when the two coarsenings have a common Hausdorff lower bound; in that case the intersection is metrizable and is their meet. Otherwise every common lower topology is non-Hausdorff. A closed-discrete construction produces such an obstructed pair for every noncompact metrizable space and every finite exceptional set with at least two points. Consequently, for these exceptional sets, the family is downward directed, or is a lattice, if and only if $(X,τ)$ is compact, in which case it consists only of $τ$.

math.GN

Journey into special $T_1$-spaces

In this survey, we review certain types of special \(T_{1}\) spaces and their associated fixed-point theorems. Kupka introduced the notion of a feeble topological contraction, which naturally generalizes Lipschitz contractions defined on metric spaces. Specifically, Kupka established a fixed-point theorem for feeble topological contractions possessing a closed graph within the product of arbitrary \(T_{0}\) spaces. Furthermore, the \(T_{1}\) separation axiom is shown to guaranty the uniqueness of such fixed points. Finally, we discuss peripheral Hausdorff and locally Hausdorff spaces within the context of these fixed-point results.

math.GN