Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1412.4268

The strong Pytkeev property in topological spaces

Abstract

A topological space $X$ has the strong Pytkeev property at a point $x\in X$ if there exists a countable family $\mathcal N$ of subsets of $X$ such that for each neighborhood $O_x\subset X$ and subset $A\subset X$ accumulating at $x$, there is a set $N\in\mathcal N$ such that $N\subset O_x$ and $N\cap A$ is infinite. We prove that for any $\aleph_0$-space $X$ and any space $Y$ with the strong Pytkeev property at a point $y\in Y$ the function space $C_k(X,Y)$ has the strong Pytkeev property at the constant function $X\to \{y\}\subset Y$. If the space $Y$ is rectifiable, then the function space $C_k(X,Y)$ is rectifiable and has the strong Pytkeev property at each point. We also prove that for any pointed spaces $(X_n,*_n)$, $n\inω$, with the strong Pytkeev property their Tychonoff product and their small box-product both have the strong Pytkeev property at the distinguished point. We prove that a sequential rectifiable space $X$ has the strong Pytkeev property if and only if $X$ is metrizable or contains a clopen submetrizable $k_ω$-subspace. A locally precompact topological group is metrizable if and only if it contains a dense subgroup with the strong Pytkeev property.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Taras Banakh, Arkady Leiderman. 2014-12-13. The strong Pytkeev property in topological spaces. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.topol.2017.01.015

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Sobriety of Scott topologies under countability conditions

In this paper, we focus on the sobriety of the Scott topology in countable case. Specifically, we show that: (1) every meet-continuous core-compact countable dcpo is sober with respect to the Scott topology; (2)every countable locally compact dcpo is sober endowed with the Scott topology; (3) the lattice of all open sets for the rational numbers space Q equipped with the Scott topology is not sober.

math.GN

Exponentiable Objects and Function spaces in Lowen Fuzzy Topological Spaces

We study exponentiable objects and function spaces in the category of stratified Lowen fuzzy topological spaces over \(\I=[0,1]\). Using the Lowen fuzzy Sierpiński object \(\Sier\), which identifies \(τ_X\) with \(C(X,\Sier)\), we explicitly determine the largest splitting topology on this mapping set. Its open weights \(Φ:τ_X\to\I\) are precisely those satisfying Scott continuity and a finite-tier compatibility condition induced by finite powers of \(\Sier\). This yields an intrinsic characterization: \(X\) is exponentiable if and only if every \(μ\inτ_X\) satisfies \[ μ=\bigvee_{λ\triangleleftΦ} (\const{Φ(μ)}\wedgeλ), \qquad λ\triangleleftΦ \Longleftrightarrow \const{Φ(ν)}\wedgeλ\leqν \quad(ν\inτ_X). \] When this condition holds, \(Y^X\) has underlying set \(C(X,Y)\), with topology generated by \([Φ,v](f)=Φ(v\circ f)\). We also obtain a dual closed-set formulation and three applications. Exponentiability implies that \(τ_X\) is a continuous lattice, although the converse fails. Moreover, a classical space \(X\) is exponentiable exactly when its induced fuzzy space \(ωX\) is exponentiable in the entire stratified Lowen category. Finally, Lowen compact, strongly fuzzy compact, and \(N\)-compact Hausdorff spaces are exponentiable.

math.GN

Super calibers in topological spaces and topological hyperspaces

We study the notion of a super caliber of a topological space, which is closely related to the classical notion of caliber and has appeared in the literature under several different names. We collect and unify several known results and establish new results concerning the collections of super calibers of topological spaces and their hyperspaces. In particular, we investigate the relationship between the super calibers of a space $X$ and those of hyperspaces $\mathcal{H}(X)$ lying between $\mathrm{CL}(X)$ and $\mathcal{F}(X)$. For infinite metrizable spaces, we characterize several cases in which $\mathsf{SC}(X)$ and $\mathsf{SC}(\mathrm{CL}(X))$ differ and establish an independence result over \textsf{ZFC}; see Theorem~5.12.

math.GN