Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1507.02496

Nonmeasurable sets and unions with respect to selected ideals especially ideals defined by trees

Robert Ralowski·Szymon Zeberski
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper we consider nonmeasurablity with respect to sigma-ideals defined be trees. First classical example of such ideal is Marczewski ideal s_0. We will consider also ideal l_0 defined by Laver trees and m_0 defined by Miller trees. With the mentioned ideals one can consider s, l and m-measurablility. We have shown that there exists a subset A of the Baire space which is s, l and m nonmeasurable at the same time. Moreover, A forms m.a.d. family which is also dominating. We show some examples of subsets of the Baire space which are measurable in one sense and nonmeasurable in the other meaning. We also examine terms nonmeasurable and completely nonmeasurable (with respect to several ideals with Borel base). There are several papers about finding (completely) nonmeasurable sets which are the union of some family of small sets. In this paper we want to focus on the following problem: "Let P be a family of small sets. Is it possible that for all A which is a subset of P, union of A is nonmeasurable implies that union of A is completely nonmeasurable?" We will consider situations when P is a partition of R, P is point-finite family and P is point-countable family. We give an equivalent statement to CH using terms nonmeasurable and completely nonmeasurable.

Explore related subjects

math.GN

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Robert Ralowski, Szymon Zeberski. 2015-07-09. Nonmeasurable sets and unions with respect to selected ideals especially ideals defined by trees. https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.02496

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN↗
arXiv2026

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN↗
arXiv2026

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN↗