Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1705.05343

Scalable Mobile Crowdsensing via Peer-to-Peer Data Sharing

Abstract

Mobile crowdsensing (MCS) is a new paradigm of sensing by taking advantage of the rich embedded sensors of mobile user devices. However, the traditional server-client MCS architecture often suffers from the high operational cost on the centralized server (e.g., for storing and processing massive data), hence the poor scalability. Peer-to-peer (P2P) data sharing can effectively reduce the server's cost by leveraging the user devices' computation and storage resources. In this work, we propose a novel P2P-based MCS architecture, where the sensing data is saved and processed in user devices locally and shared among users in a P2P manner. To provide necessary incentives for users in such a system, we propose a quality-aware data sharing market, where the users who sense data can sell data to others who request data but not want to sense the data by themselves. We analyze the user behavior dynamics from the game-theoretic perspective, and characterize the existence and uniqueness of the game equilibrium. We further propose best response iterative algorithms to reach the equilibrium with provable convergence. Our simulations show that the P2P data sharing can greatly improve the social welfare, especially in the model with a high transmission cost and a low trading price.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Changkun Jiang, Lin Gao, Lingjie Duan, Jianwei Huang. 2017-05-15. Scalable Mobile Crowdsensing via Peer-to-Peer Data Sharing. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.05343

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Learning in Structured Stackelberg Games

We initiate the study of structured Stackelberg games, a novel form of strategic interaction between a leader and a follower where contextual information can be predictive of the follower's (unknown) type. Motivated by applications such as security games and AI safety, we show how this additional structure can help the leader learn a utility-maximizing policy in both the online and distributional settings. In the online setting, we first prove that standard learning-theoretic measures of complexity do not characterize the difficulty of the leader's learning task. Notably, we find that there exists a learning-theoretic measure of complexity, analogous to the Littlestone dimension in online classification, that tightly characterizes the leader's instance-optimal regret. We term this the Stackelberg-Littlestone dimension, and leverage it to provide a provably optimal online learning algorithm. In the distributional setting, we provide analogous results by showing that two new dimensions control the sample complexity upper- and lower-bound.

cs.GT

Equilibrium and Infeasibility: A new solution concept for games

Addressing infeasibility in non-cooperative games has become an important topic, as many problems across different applications face this issue. In this paper, we propose a new solution concept for generalized games with possibly infeasible individual constraints. A solution is defined as the limit of a sequence of generalized Nash equilibria induced by games with penalty terms relaxing the individual constraints. Existence is established for a broad range of games and we provide conditions allowing to characterize a $ψ$-penalized solution as a strategy profile maximizing every player's utility over all her penalty minimizing strategies. A variation of Divide-the-Dollar serves as an illustrative example. We further establish the compatibility with the GNE and the solution to the Nash bargaining.

cs.GT

Subgame-Perfect Nash Equilibria of Plurality Voting with Abstention: a PSPACE-Completeness Result for Restricted Ballots

We consider sequential Plurality elections in which each voter may abstain or vote for a single candidate. Each voter assigns utilities to all candidates; for each voter, this induces a (weak) order over the candidates. Ties are resolved uniformly at random, and voting has a small positive cost, so that a voter prefers to abstain when their vote cannot change the election outcome. We consider a variant of this model where, for each voter, we additionally specify a prefix of her ranking, so that she is only allowed to vote for a candidate from that prefix (or abstain). We prove that for this variant of the model, deciding whether a designated candidate is among the election winners in a subgame-perfect equilibrium of the associated extensive-form game is PSPACE-complete. This partially resolves an open problem from the work of Desmedt and Elkind [2010].

cs.GT