Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1705.11060

Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items

Britta Dorn·Ronald de Haan·Ildikó Schlotter
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider the following control problem on fair allocation of indivisible goods. Given a set $I$ of items and a set of agents, each having strict linear preference over the items, we ask for a minimum subset of the items whose deletion guarantees the existence of a proportional allocation in the remaining instance; we call this problem Proportionality by Item Deletion (PID). Our main result is a polynomial-time algorithm that solves PID for three agents. By contrast, we prove that PID is computationally intractable when the number of agents is unbounded, even if the number $k$ of item deletions allowed is small, since the problem turns out to be W[3]-hard with respect to the parameter $k$. Additionally, we provide some tight lower and upper bounds on the complexity of PID when regarded as a function of $|I|$ and $k$.

Explore related subjects

cs.MAcs.CCcs.GT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Britta Dorn, Ronald de Haan, Ildikó Schlotter. 2017-05-31. Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.11060

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Fully Byzantine-Resilient Distributed Multi-Agent Q-Learning

We study Byzantine-resilient distributed multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), where agents collaboratively learn optimal value functions over a compromised communication network. Existing resilient MARL approaches typically guarantee almost sure convergence only to near-optimal value functions, or require restrictive assumptions to ensure convergence to the optimal solution. Thus, agents may fail to learn the optimal policies under these methods. To address this, we propose a novel distributed Q-learning algorithm, under which all agents' value functions converge almost surely to the optimal value functions despite Byzantine edge attacks. The key idea is a redundancy-based filtering mechanism that leverages two-hop neighbor information to validate incoming messages, while preserving bidirectional information flow. We then introduce a new topological condition for the convergence of our algorithm, present a systematic method to construct such networks, and prove that this condition can be verified in polynomial time. We validate our results through simulations, showing that our method converges to the optimal solutions, whereas other methods fail under Byzantine edge attacks.

cs.MA↗
arXiv2026

Nash Approximation Gap in Truncated Infinite-horizon Partially Observable Markov Games

Partially Observable Markov Games (POMGs) provide a general framework for modeling multi-agent sequential decision-making under asymmetric information. A common approach is to reformulate a POMG as a fully observable Markov game over belief states, where the state is the conditional distribution of the system state and agents' private information given common information, and actions correspond to mappings (prescriptions) from private information to actions. However, this reformulation is intractable in infinite-horizon settings, as both the belief state and action spaces grow with the accumulation of information over time. We propose a finite-memory truncation framework that approximates infinite-horizon POMGs by a finite-state, finite-action Markov game, where agents condition decisions only on finite windows of common and private information. Under suitable filter stability (forgetting) conditions, we show that any Nash equilibrium of the truncated game is an $\varepsilon$-Nash equilibrium of the original POMG, where $\varepsilon \to 0$ as the truncation length increases.

cs.MA↗
arXiv2026

The Mechanics of a Swarm: A Reproducible External Reconstruction of an Unintended Agent-Coordination Episode on a Third-Party Wiki

Between 24 May and 2 July 2026, autonomous language-model agents running inside a timed research-question evaluation wrote to a third party's public, world-writable wiki. OpenAI acknowledged the incident; independent researchers reconstructed it and published the wiki's archived revision history. We analyse that history (14,591 revisions, 3,103 names, 4,579 pages) as a behavioural record, attributing text to the revision that added it. Under an explicit identity model we reconstruct 907 cohorts and estimate about 876 episodes (95% interval 784-1008). Coordination formats converged within a day, and heterogeneous schedules over one question chain created large opportunities for information asymmetry: the first report of an item preceded a later cohort's own arrival by a median of 3.4 h. Across the 510 cohorts with an observable progress trace we find no robust positive association between measured coordination and documented progress. This version adds a source the export lacks: the wiki operator's own request log, 5,157,202 records over four months. It holds roughly 2.66M content requests and 1.58M searches, and 7,254 acting names against the export's 3,103; 2,578 names neither save nor open an edit form. Content requests before writing are observed for 1,034 of 1,140 coordinating names, and the first coordination page is requested 17 s after its creation. These records establish requests, not delivery or causal use. Among newcomers without a marker on their first written page, prior requests to other marker-bearing pages occur for 40.2% of marker adopters and 31.7% of non-adopters. The association remains, but our first-pass reading of it as transmission is withdrawn: page choice, shared behaviour and action-dependent nameability prevent causal identification. We list the claims from our earlier analyses that re-examination overturned, including one from this version's own first pass

cs.MA↗