Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 1706.04000

The mass--metallicity relation AKARI-FMOS infrared galaxies at $z\sim0.88$ in the AKARI North Ecliptic Pole Deep Survey Field

Abstract

Mass, metallicity, and star formation rate (SFR) of a galaxy are crucial parameters in understanding galaxy formation and evolution. However, the relation among these is still a matter of debate for luminous infrared galaxies, which carry a bulk of SFR budget of the universe at $z\sim1$. We have investigated the relation among stellar mass, gas-phase oxygen abundance, and SFR of AKARI-detected mid-IR galaxies at $z\sim0.88$ in the AKARI NEP deep field. We observed about 350 AKARI sources with Subaru/FMOS NIR spectrograph, and detected secure and expected H$α$ emission lines from 25 and 44 galaxies, respectively. The SFR of our sample is almost constant ($\sim 25M_{\odot}/yr$) over the stellar mass range of our sample. Compared with main-sequence (MS) galaxies at a similar redshift range, the average SFR of our detected sample is comparable for massive galaxies ($\sim10^{10.58}~M_{\odot}$), while higher by $\sim$0.6dex for less massive galaxies ($\sim 10^{10.05}~M_{\odot}$). We measure metallicities from the [NII]/H$α$ emission line ratio. We find that the mass-metallicity relation of our individually measured sources agrees with that for optical-selected star-forming galaxies at $z\sim0.1$, while metallicities of stacked spectra agree with that of MS galaxies at $z\sim0.78$. Considering high SFR of individually measured sources, FMR of the IR galaxies is different from that at $z\sim0.1$. However, on the mass-metallicity plane, they are consistent with the MS galaxies, highlighting higher SFR of the IR galaxies. This suggests the evolutionary path of our IR galaxies is different from that of MS galaxies. A possible physical interpretation includes that the star-formation activities of IR galaxies at $z\sim0.88$ in our sample are enhanced by interaction and/or merger of galaxies, but the inflow of metal-poor gas is not yet induced, keeping the metallicity intact.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nagisa Oi, Tomotsugu Goto, Matthew Malkan, Chris Pearson, Hideo Matsuhara. 2017-06-13. The mass--metallicity relation AKARI-FMOS infrared galaxies at $z\sim0.88$ in the AKARI North Ecliptic Pole Deep Survey Field. https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj%2Fpsx053

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Entangling of Supernova Feedback Impacts with Coarsening Simulation Resolution

It is often understood that supernova (SN) feedback in galaxies is responsible for regulating star formation (SF) and generating gaseous outflows. However, a detailed look at the small-scale effects of SNe on the interstellar medium (ISM) in simulations shows that the macroscopic processes of SF suppression and outflow generation proceed in distinct channels. We demonstrate this finding in two independent simulations of isolated dwarf galaxies with very high (m_gas ~ Msun) numerical resolution, LYRA and RIGEL. Our findings suggest that the macroscopic effect of a given SN on the galaxy is best predicted by its local density. Outflows are driven by SNe in diffuse regions expanding to their cooling radii on large (~kpc) scales, while dense SF regions are disrupted in a localized (~pc) manner. However, these separate feedback channels are only distinguishable at very high resolutions capable of following mass scales \lesssim 10^2 \msun. When averaging on coarser scales, ISM densities are greatly mis-estimated, and variations between different SF and SNe-affected regions are severely washed out. It therefore cannot be __self-consistently__ determined, from coarse-resolution information __alone__, (1) whether a SN tends to contribute to outflows or direct SF suppression, and (2) the rate of SF in a given region. In particular, commonly used parameters in coarse-resolution (subgrid) models, such as the SN cooling radius and SF density threshold, may require more detailed treatments informed by high-resolution studies.

astro-ph.GA↗

Computational advances and challenges in simulations of turbulence and star formation

We review recent advances in the numerical modeling of turbulent flows and star formation. An overview of the most widely used simulation codes and their core capabilities is provided. We then examine methods for achieving the highest-resolution magnetohydrodynamical turbulence simulations to date, highlighting challenges related to numerical viscosity and resistivity. State-of-the-art approaches to modeling gravity and star formation are discussed in detail, including implementations of star particles and feedback from jets, winds, heating, ionization, and supernovae. We review the latest techniques for radiation hydrodynamics, including ray tracing, Monte Carlo, and moment methods, with comparisons between the flux-limited diffusion, moment-1, and variable Eddington tensor methods. The final chapter summarizes advances in cosmic-ray transport schemes, emphasizing their growing importance for connecting small-scale star formation physics with galaxy-scale evolution.

astro-ph.GA↗

How significant is the lensing interpretation of GW231123?

GW231123 is one of the most unusual gravitational-wave (GW) events, with exceptionally large inferred masses and near-extremal spins, offering an opportunity to test whether propagation effects contribute to these properties. We therefore examine whether the data support wave-optics microlensing embedded in a strong-lensing galaxy, whose detection becomes increasingly likely as observations accumulate, whether this interpretation can explain these properties, and how significant the preference remains under detector noise and waveform systematics. We compare six hypotheses: unlensed, isolated point mass, and embedded point-mass (EPM) and binary-lens (EB) effective models in Type-I (minimum) and Type-II (saddle) macro images. The EB Type-I model is most favored. For the most accurate waveform model NRSur7dq4, it gives $\log_{10}B^{\rm EB-I}_{\rm U}=2.60$, versus $0.89$ for Type II, indicating sensitivity to macro-image geometry. Within Type I, however, the binary improves over the point mass by only $\log_{10}B^{\rm EB-I}_{\rm EPM-I}=0.16$ and $Δ\ln\mathcal{L}_{\max}=0.56$, providing no clear evidence for structure beyond a single effective perturber. Moreover, under embedded lensing, waveform-template discrepancies and inferred masses and spins are reduced. However, real O4a backgrounds from numerical-relativity injections show that the apparent lensing evidence is sensitive to waveform systematics and realistic detector noise: although the commonly used waveform IMRPhenomXPHM gives the largest Bayes factor, $\log_{10}B^{\rm EB-I}_{\rm U}=4.52$, it is less exceptional relative to its own background, with a false-alarm probability of $6.5$--$8\%$, whereas NRSur7dq4 gives only $2$--$3\%$. Thus, waveform systematics can amplify apparent lensing evidence, but GW231123 remains an intriguing lensing candidate.

astro-ph.GA↗