Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1710.07605

Analytical Methods for Measuring the Parameters of Interstellar Gas Using the Data of Methanol Observations

Abstract

We analyze methanol excitation in the absence of external radiation and consider LTE methods for probing interstellar gas. We show that rotation diagrams correctly estimate the gas kinetic temperature only if they are built from lines with the upper levels located in the same K-ladders, such as the J_0-J_{-1}E lines at 157~GHz, the J_1-J_0E lines at 165~GHz or the J_2-J_1E lines at 25~GHz. The gas density should be no less than 10^7~cm^{-3}. Rotation diagrams built from lines with different K values of the upper levels (2_K-1_K at 96~GHz, 3_K-2_K at 145~GHz, or 5_K-4_K at 241~GHz) significantly underestimate the temperature but allow a density estimation. In addition, the diagrams based on the 2_K-1_K lines make possible methanol column density estimates within a factor of about 2--5. We suggest that rotation diagrams should be used in the following manner. First, one should build two rotation diagrams, one from the lines at 96, 145, or 241~GHz, and another from the lines at 157, 165, or 25~GHz. The former diagram is used to estimate the gas density. If the density is about 10^7~cm^{-3} or higher, the latter diagram reproduces the temperature fairly well. If the density is around 10^6~cm^{-3}, the temperature obtained from the latter diagram should be multiplied by a factor of 1.5--2. If the density is about 10^5~cm^{-3} or lower, then the latter diagram yields a temperature that is lower than the kinetic temperature by a factor of three or larger and should be used only as a lower limit on the kinetic temperature. Errors of methanol column density determined from the integrated intensity of a single line may be larger than an order of magnitude even when the gas temperature is well-known. However, if the J_0-(J-1)_0E lines, as well as the J_1-(J-1)_1A^{+} or A^{-} lines are used, the relative error of the column density proves to be no larger than several units.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S. V. Kalenskii, S. Kurtz. 2017-10-20. Analytical Methods for Measuring the Parameters of Interstellar Gas Using the Data of Methanol Observations. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1063772916080047

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Entangling of Supernova Feedback Impacts with Coarsening Simulation Resolution

It is often understood that supernova (SN) feedback in galaxies is responsible for regulating star formation (SF) and generating gaseous outflows. However, a detailed look at the small-scale effects of SNe on the interstellar medium (ISM) in simulations shows that the macroscopic processes of SF suppression and outflow generation proceed in distinct channels. We demonstrate this finding in two independent simulations of isolated dwarf galaxies with very high (m_gas ~ Msun) numerical resolution, LYRA and RIGEL. Our findings suggest that the macroscopic effect of a given SN on the galaxy is best predicted by its local density. Outflows are driven by SNe in diffuse regions expanding to their cooling radii on large (~kpc) scales, while dense SF regions are disrupted in a localized (~pc) manner. However, these separate feedback channels are only distinguishable at very high resolutions capable of following mass scales \lesssim 10^2 \msun. When averaging on coarser scales, ISM densities are greatly mis-estimated, and variations between different SF and SNe-affected regions are severely washed out. It therefore cannot be __self-consistently__ determined, from coarse-resolution information __alone__, (1) whether a SN tends to contribute to outflows or direct SF suppression, and (2) the rate of SF in a given region. In particular, commonly used parameters in coarse-resolution (subgrid) models, such as the SN cooling radius and SF density threshold, may require more detailed treatments informed by high-resolution studies.

astro-ph.GA

Computational advances and challenges in simulations of turbulence and star formation

We review recent advances in the numerical modeling of turbulent flows and star formation. An overview of the most widely used simulation codes and their core capabilities is provided. We then examine methods for achieving the highest-resolution magnetohydrodynamical turbulence simulations to date, highlighting challenges related to numerical viscosity and resistivity. State-of-the-art approaches to modeling gravity and star formation are discussed in detail, including implementations of star particles and feedback from jets, winds, heating, ionization, and supernovae. We review the latest techniques for radiation hydrodynamics, including ray tracing, Monte Carlo, and moment methods, with comparisons between the flux-limited diffusion, moment-1, and variable Eddington tensor methods. The final chapter summarizes advances in cosmic-ray transport schemes, emphasizing their growing importance for connecting small-scale star formation physics with galaxy-scale evolution.

astro-ph.GA

How significant is the lensing interpretation of GW231123?

GW231123 is one of the most unusual gravitational-wave (GW) events, with exceptionally large inferred masses and near-extremal spins, offering an opportunity to test whether propagation effects contribute to these properties. We therefore examine whether the data support wave-optics microlensing embedded in a strong-lensing galaxy, whose detection becomes increasingly likely as observations accumulate, whether this interpretation can explain these properties, and how significant the preference remains under detector noise and waveform systematics. We compare six hypotheses: unlensed, isolated point mass, and embedded point-mass (EPM) and binary-lens (EB) effective models in Type-I (minimum) and Type-II (saddle) macro images. The EB Type-I model is most favored. For the most accurate waveform model NRSur7dq4, it gives $\log_{10}B^{\rm EB-I}_{\rm U}=2.60$, versus $0.89$ for Type II, indicating sensitivity to macro-image geometry. Within Type I, however, the binary improves over the point mass by only $\log_{10}B^{\rm EB-I}_{\rm EPM-I}=0.16$ and $Δ\ln\mathcal{L}_{\max}=0.56$, providing no clear evidence for structure beyond a single effective perturber. Moreover, under embedded lensing, waveform-template discrepancies and inferred masses and spins are reduced. However, real O4a backgrounds from numerical-relativity injections show that the apparent lensing evidence is sensitive to waveform systematics and realistic detector noise: although the commonly used waveform IMRPhenomXPHM gives the largest Bayes factor, $\log_{10}B^{\rm EB-I}_{\rm U}=4.52$, it is less exceptional relative to its own background, with a false-alarm probability of $6.5$--$8\%$, whereas NRSur7dq4 gives only $2$--$3\%$. Thus, waveform systematics can amplify apparent lensing evidence, but GW231123 remains an intriguing lensing candidate.

astro-ph.GA