Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1712.06236

Optimal Pricing of User-Initiated Data-Plan Sharing in A Roaming Market

Abstract

A smartphone user's personal hotspot (pH) allows him to share cellular connection to another (e.g., a traveler) in the vicinity, but such sharing consumes the limited data quota in his two-part tariff plan and may lead to overage charge. This paper studies how to motivate such pH-enabled data-plan sharing between local users and travelers in the ever-growing roaming markets, and proposes pricing incentive for a data-plan buyer to reward surrounding pH sellers (if any). The pricing scheme practically takes into account the information uncertainty at the traveler side, including the random mobility and the sharing cost distribution of selfish local users who potentially share pHs. Though the pricing optimization problem is non-convex, we show that there always exists a unique optimal price to tradeoff between the successful sharing opportunity and the sharing price. We further generalize the optimal pricing to the case of heterogeneous selling pHs who have diverse data usage behaviors in the sharing cost distributions, and we show such diversity may or may not benefit the traveler. Lacking selfish pHs' information, the traveler's expected cost is higher than that under the complete information, but the gap diminishes as the pHs' spatial density increases. Finally, we analyze the challenging scenario that multiple travelers overlap for demanding data-plan sharing, by resorting to a near-optimal pricing scheme. We show that a traveler suffers as the travelers' spatial density increases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Feng Wang, Lingjie Duan, Jianwei Niu. 2018-06-27. Optimal Pricing of User-Initiated Data-Plan Sharing in A Roaming Market. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.06236

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Learning in Structured Stackelberg Games

We initiate the study of structured Stackelberg games, a novel form of strategic interaction between a leader and a follower where contextual information can be predictive of the follower's (unknown) type. Motivated by applications such as security games and AI safety, we show how this additional structure can help the leader learn a utility-maximizing policy in both the online and distributional settings. In the online setting, we first prove that standard learning-theoretic measures of complexity do not characterize the difficulty of the leader's learning task. Notably, we find that there exists a learning-theoretic measure of complexity, analogous to the Littlestone dimension in online classification, that tightly characterizes the leader's instance-optimal regret. We term this the Stackelberg-Littlestone dimension, and leverage it to provide a provably optimal online learning algorithm. In the distributional setting, we provide analogous results by showing that two new dimensions control the sample complexity upper- and lower-bound.

cs.GT

Equilibrium and Infeasibility: A new solution concept for games

Addressing infeasibility in non-cooperative games has become an important topic, as many problems across different applications face this issue. In this paper, we propose a new solution concept for generalized games with possibly infeasible individual constraints. A solution is defined as the limit of a sequence of generalized Nash equilibria induced by games with penalty terms relaxing the individual constraints. Existence is established for a broad range of games and we provide conditions allowing to characterize a $ψ$-penalized solution as a strategy profile maximizing every player's utility over all her penalty minimizing strategies. A variation of Divide-the-Dollar serves as an illustrative example. We further establish the compatibility with the GNE and the solution to the Nash bargaining.

cs.GT

Subgame-Perfect Nash Equilibria of Plurality Voting with Abstention: a PSPACE-Completeness Result for Restricted Ballots

We consider sequential Plurality elections in which each voter may abstain or vote for a single candidate. Each voter assigns utilities to all candidates; for each voter, this induces a (weak) order over the candidates. Ties are resolved uniformly at random, and voting has a small positive cost, so that a voter prefers to abstain when their vote cannot change the election outcome. We consider a variant of this model where, for each voter, we additionally specify a prefix of her ranking, so that she is only allowed to vote for a candidate from that prefix (or abstain). We prove that for this variant of the model, deciding whether a designated candidate is among the election winners in a subgame-perfect equilibrium of the associated extensive-form game is PSPACE-complete. This partially resolves an open problem from the work of Desmedt and Elkind [2010].

cs.GT