Are Abstracts Enough for Hypothesis Generation?

Justin Sybrandt; Angelo Carrabba; Alexander Herzog; Ilya Safro

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1804.05942

Are Abstracts Enough for Hypothesis Generation?

Justin Sybrandt·Angelo Carrabba·Alexander Herzog·Ilya Safro

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The potential for automatic hypothesis generation (HG) systems to improve research productivity keeps pace with the growing set of publicly available scientific information. But as data becomes easier to acquire, we must understand the effect different textual data sources have on our resulting hypotheses. Are abstracts enough for HG, or does it need full-text papers? How many papers does an HG system need to make valuable predictions? How sensitive is a general-purpose HG system to hyperparameter values or input quality? What effect does corpus size and document length have on HG results? To answer these questions we train multiple versions of knowledge network-based HG system, Moliere, on varying corpora in order to compare challenges and trade offs in terms of result quality and computational requirements. Moliere generalizes main principles of similar knowledge network-based HG systems and reinforces them with topic modeling components. The corpora include the abstract and full-text versions of PubMed Central, as well as iterative halves of MEDLINE, which allows us to compare the effect document length and count has on the results. We find that, quantitatively, corpora with a higher median document length result in marginally higher quality results, yet require substantially longer to process. However, qualitatively, full-length papers introduce a significant number of intruder terms to the resulting topics, which decreases human interpretability. Additionally, we find that the effect of document length is greater than that of document count, even if both sets contain only paper abstracts. Reproducibility: Our code and data are available at github.com/jsybran/moliere, and bit.ly/2GxghpM respectively.

Explore related subjects

cs.IR cs.DL

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Justin Sybrandt, Angelo Carrabba, Alexander Herzog, Ilya Safro. 2018-10-20. Are Abstracts Enough for Hypothesis Generation?. https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.05942

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Scoring With the Engine: Retrieval Exposure, Cross-Engine Divergence, and the Limits of Engine-Agnostic GEO Scores

Recent work asks whether generative-engine visibility can be approximated with deterministic, engine-free page scores. We separate two stages such scores can conflate: exposure to a live engine and citation selection conditional on exposure. In an observational audit of ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google, and Perplexity, 15 fixed commercial prompts produced 589 citation observations on 6 June 2026, corresponding to 528 unique URLs and 356 domains. Same-prompt cross-engine URL overlap was extremely small: mean pairwise Jaccard similarity was 0.0079, the median was zero, and 84.9% of engine pairs shared no cited URL. On the ten prompts observed on all four engines, mean exact-URL Jaccard was 0.0072. A matched-size hypergeometric baseline preserving each prompt's four-engine URL universe and each engine's list length predicts 0.1272, so observed overlap was only 5.7% of that baseline; zero URL overlap occurred in 86.7% of comparisons versus 12.3% expected. Top-five exact-URL overlap was zero in all 60 pairwise comparisons. A single engine captured only 11.4%-42.6% of the four-engine URL union, and 96.4% of observed URLs appeared in only one engine. A separate 5-to-6 June same-engine comparison found 67.0% mean URL-set turnover. These results do not invalidate engine-free page scoring; they identify its estimand. A score computed without a live engine can estimate page quality or query-page fit, while end-to-end visibility additionally depends on engine-specific exposure and selection. We therefore argue for reporting page fit, observed exposure, conditional selection, and final visibility as distinct quantities.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

RankSteer: Can Pointwise LLM Rankers Be Calibrated at the Representation Level?

Large language models (LLMs) are strong zero-shot pointwise rankers, but lag behind pairwise and listwise methods. Beyond missing comparative signals, we identify a \textit{calibration gap}: ranking-relevant information encoded in hidden states is not fully captured by the scalar output head. We propose RankSteer, a post-hoc activation-steering framework that calibrates ranking via projection-based interventions along multiple directions at inference time: decision, evidence, and, optionally, role. This is achieved without updating model weights or introducing cross-document comparisons. We instantiate RankSteer on two structurally distinct pointwise variants and observe improvements over their respective baselines on most TREC DL and BEIR datasets across three backbones. This suggests that the calibration gap is a general property of pointwise rankers. Our additional geometric analysis shows that steering improves ranking by concentrating each query's document representations along an existing ranking geometry, offering new insight into how LLMs internally represent and calibrate relevance judgments.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

IntTravel: A Real-World Dataset and Generative Framework for Integrated Multi-Task Travel Recommendation

Next Point of Interest (POI) recommendation is essential for modern mobility and location-based services. To provide a smooth user experience, models must understand several components of a journey holistically: "when to depart", "how to travel", "where to go", and "what needs arise via the route". However, current research is limited by fragmented datasets that focus merely on next POI recommendation ("where to go"), neglecting the departure time, travel mode, and situational requirements along the journey. Furthermore, the limited scale of these datasets impedes accurate evaluation of performance. To bridge this gap, we introduce IntTravel, the first large-scale public dataset collected from Amap for integrated travel recommendation, including 4.1 billion interactions from 163 million users with 7.3 million POIs. Built upon this dataset, we introduce an end-to-end, decoder-only generative framework for multi-task recommendation. It incorporates information preservation, selection, and factorization to balance task collaboration with specialized differentiation, yielding substantial performance gains. IntTravel has been successfully deployed on Amap serving hundreds of millions of users, leading to a 1.09\% increase in CTR. IntTravel is available at https://github.com/AMAP-ML/DreamX-Rec/.

cs.IR↗