Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1901.08133

The Wisdom of a Kalman Crowd

Abstract

The Kalman Filter has been called one of the greatest inventions in statistics during the 20th century. Its purpose is to measure the state of a system by processing the noisy data received from different electronic sensors. In comparison, a useful resource for managers in their effort to make the right decisions is the wisdom of crowds. This phenomenon allows managers to combine judgments by different employees to get estimates that are often more accurate and reliable than estimates, which managers produce alone. Since harnessing the collective intelligence of employees, and filtering signals from multiple noisy sensors appear related, we looked at the possibility of using the Kalman Filter on estimates by people. Our predictions suggest, and our findings based on the Survey of Professional Forecasters reveal, that the Kalman Filter can help managers solve their decision-making problems by giving them stronger signals before they choose. Indeed, when used on a subset of forecasters identified by the Contribution Weighted Model, the Kalman Filter beat that rule clearly, across all the forecasting horizons in the survey.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ulrik W. Nash. 2019-01-23. The Wisdom of a Kalman Crowd. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.08133

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Inference for Treatment Effects Conditional on Generalized Principal Strata using Instrumental Variables

We propose a general approach to inference for a broad class of models that arise in the analysis of treatment effects with discrete-valued treatments and instruments and a general-valued outcome. In addition to instrument exogeneity, the main substantive assumption in our class of models rules out certain response types by assuming that they occur with probability zero. Here, the response type refers to the vector of potential outcomes and potential treatments, and we refer to a set of possible values for the response type as a generalized principal stratum. Through a series of examples, we show that this framework encompasses a wide variety of assumptions that have been considered in the previous literature. Our framework allows inference on any treatment effect parameter that can be expressed as the expectation of a function of the response type conditional on a generalized principal stratum. We develop methods for inference on such parameters under these assumptions, as well as methods for testing the validity of the assumptions themselves. A key result of our analysis is a characterization of the identified set for such parameters under these assumptions and the testable restrictions for the assumptions themselves in terms of existence of a nonnegative solution to linear systems of equations with a special structure. We propose methods for inference exploiting this special structure and recent results in Fang et al. (2023).

econ.EM

Raking for estimation and inference in panel models with nonignorable attrition and refreshment

In panel data subject to nonignorable attrition, auxiliary (refreshment) sampling may restore full identification under weak assumptions on the attrition process. Despite their generality, these identification strategies have seen limited empirical use, largely because the implied estimation procedure requires solving a functional minimization problem for the target density. When the distributions of the observed data are parametric, we show that this problem can be solved using the iterative proportional fitting (raking) algorithm, which converges rapidly even with continuous data. The resulting density estimator is then used as input into a parametric moment condition. We establish consistency and convergence rates for both the raking-based density estimator and the resulting moment estimator. We also derive a simple recursive procedure for estimating the asymptotic variance. Finally, we demonstrate the satisfactory performance of our estimator in simulations and provide an empirical illustration using data from the Understanding America Study panel.

econ.EM

Summary Indices in Treatment Effect Estimation

This paper studies the practice of combining multiple outcomes into a summary index to estimate a causal effect. For common estimators and index constructions, the estimate equals a weighted sum of the estimated effects on the components, with weights that are implicit and rarely reported. The paper derives the weights and shows that, for inverse-covariance-weighted indices, they can be negative and unrestricted in magnitude, so the index effect can have the opposite sign to every component effect. The paper proposes two procedures for valid inference on the index effect: a variance estimator that accounts for the data-dependent weights, and a shifted t-test that requires no such correction. Conventional t-tests of the null of no effect remain valid. Contrary to common claims, summary indices do not generally improve power. Three published studies illustrate the results.

econ.EM