Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1902.01015

Factor Investing: A Bayesian Hierarchical Approach

Abstract

This paper investigates asset allocation problems when returns are predictable. We introduce a market-timing Bayesian hierarchical (BH) approach that adopts heterogeneous time-varying coefficients driven by lagged fundamental characteristics. Our approach includes a joint estimation of conditional expected returns and covariance matrix and considers estimation risk for portfolio analysis. The hierarchical prior allows modeling different assets separately while sharing information across assets. We demonstrate the performance of the U.S. equity market. Though the Bayesian forecast is slightly biased, our BH approach outperforms most alternative methods in point and interval prediction. Our BH approach in sector investment for the recent twenty years delivers a 0.92\% average monthly returns and a 0.32\% significant Jensen`s alpha. We also find technology, energy, and manufacturing are important sectors in the past decade, and size, investment, and short-term reversal factors are heavily weighted. Finally, the stochastic discount factor constructed by our BH approach explains most anomalies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Guanhao Feng, Jingyu He. 2020-09-17. Factor Investing: A Bayesian Hierarchical Approach. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.01015

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Sequential Estimation of Dynamic Discrete Choice Models with Unobserved Heterogeneity

Unobserved heterogeneity is empirically central in dynamic discrete choice models but computationally costly to incorporate: estimation requires repeatedly solving fixed-point equations for every latent type. We develop EM-NPL($q$), a unified framework combining the sequential pseudo-likelihood (NPL) and finite-mixture Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithms, truncating the inner solver to $q$ iterations, and accommodating the Bellman, policy valuation, Euler, and Efficient Pseudo-Likelihood (EPL) equations, with step-by-step implementation guidance. For linear-in-parameters models estimated via the policy valuation or EPL equations, we establish truncation invariance: for any $q\geq 1$, EM-NPL($q$) is numerically identical to the fully converged EM-NPL estimator, so q affects computation but not statistical properties. We establish consistency, asymptotic normality, and local convergence. Truncation reduces runtime by up to 26\% for PV\_GMRES in single-agent simulations and 58\% for EPL in dynamic games. In a cola-demand application, ignoring unobserved heterogeneity understates own-price elasticities and soda-tax compensating variation by up to 85\% and 90\%.

econ.EM

Conformalized Lee Inference: Distribution-Free Prediction Sets for Individual Treatment Effect under Monotone Sample Selection

Treatment can change which outcomes are observed, so treated-selected and selected-control units need not represent the same latent population. This paper proposes conformalized Lee inference for counterfactual prediction under randomized treatment and monotone sample selection. The procedure uses treated-selected observations to fit and calibrate an arbitrary prediction rule and replaces the usual $(1-α)$ score quantile with the adjusted $(1-απ)$ quantile, where $π$ is the identified share of always-selected units among treated-selected units. The resulting prediction set has finite-sample, distribution-free marginal coverage over the sharp Lee ambiguity set. For a selected-control unit, subtracting the observed untreated outcome yields a marginal prediction set for the realized individual treatment effect. The adjusted population cutoff is minimax optimal over the reduced-information identification region. Simulations show that ordinary split-conformal prediction can under-cover under distribution shifts induced by selection, whereas the adjusted procedures restore coverage. Empirical analysis uses the National Job Corps Study data to illustrate prediction sets for individual wage effects of assignment to program access.

econ.EM

Profiled Anderson--Rubin Test: Robust Inference Allowing for Direct Effects of Instruments

Instrumental variable analyses often rely on the assumption that instruments affect the outcome only through the endogenous regressor. In many applications, researchers can defend only a plausible range for direct effects of instruments, while conventional sensitivity analyses may be unreliable when instruments are weak. This paper proposes the profiled Anderson--Rubin (pAR) test, which considers all direct effects within a prespecified range and retains a candidate effect whenever at least one admissible direct effect is consistent with the data. Under the maintained sampling assumptions, the procedure controls false rejection for each compatible candidate without requiring strong instruments. The paper provides practical methods for constructing confidence sets and distinguishes substantive bounds from bounds tied to the realized instrument design. Simulations and applications to retirement saving and returns to schooling show that the procedure resembles conventional sensitivity analysis when instruments are strong but preserves substantially more uncertainty when identification is weak.

econ.EM