Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1905.09405

Targeted Smooth Bayesian Causal Forests: An analysis of heterogeneous treatment effects for simultaneous versus interval medical abortion regimens over gestation

Jennifer E. Starling·Jared S. Murray·Patricia A. Lohr·Abigail R. A. Aiken·Carlos M. Carvalho·James G. Scott
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We introduce Targeted Smooth Bayesian Causal Forests (tsBCF), a nonparametric Bayesian approach for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects which vary smoothly over a single covariate in the observational data setting. The tsBCF method induces smoothness by parameterizing terminal tree nodes with smooth functions, and allows for separate regularization of treatment effects versus prognostic effect of control covariates. Smoothing parameters for prognostic and treatment effects can be chosen to reflect prior knowledge or tuned in a data-dependent way. We use tsBCF to analyze a new clinical protocol for early medical abortion. Our aim is to assess relative effectiveness of simultaneous versus interval administration of mifepristone and misoprostol over the first nine weeks of gestation. The model reflects our expectation that the relative effectiveness varies smoothly over gestation, but not necessarily over other covariates. We demonstrate the performance of the tsBCF method on benchmarking experiments. Software for tsBCF is available at https://github.com/jestarling/tsbcf/.

Explore related subjects

stat.AP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jennifer E. Starling, Jared S. Murray, Patricia A. Lohr, Abigail R. A. Aiken, Carlos M. Carvalho, James G. Scott. 2020-02-23. Targeted Smooth Bayesian Causal Forests: An analysis of heterogeneous treatment effects for simultaneous versus interval medical abortion regimens over gestation. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.09405

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Spending Scarce Confirmatory PET Measurements: Target-Aligned Validation in A4/LEARN

Anti-amyloid therapies and blood-based biomarkers are changing Alzheimer disease workups into a two-stage measurement workflow: screen broadly with cheaper information, then spend scarce confirmatory amyloid measurements where they support the decision that will be reported. Amyloid positron-emission tomography (PET) remains one such protocol measurement for amyloid burden, but PET slots, trial budgets, and payer-facing evidence packages are finite. This paper asks a deliberately operational question: when is simple transparent PET validation enough, and when is a fitted residual-uncertainty score worth the added complexity? For a weighted protocol target, the first-order value of validating subject i is the product of target influence and residual protocol uncertainty. Generic uncertainty sampling uses only the second factor and can spend PET measurements on subjects that are hard to predict but weak for the scientific, clinical, or commercial claim. We apply this rule to the A4/LEARN PET archive, treating observed PET as a design laboratory for scarce-confirmation studies. For the primary APOE4 carrier versus non-carrier contrast in Centiloid 24-or-higher PET positivity, simple APOE4-balanced validation recovers nearly all of the target-specific gain: at PET budget 200, the confidence-interval width ratio relative to random validation is 0.923 for APOE4 balancing and 0.914 for target-specific scoring, while generic uncertainty sampling is 0.980. Other targets behave differently: target-specific scoring gives larger gains for an age-slope analysis and for cutoff-indexed PET positivity. The practical message is simple: spend scarce protocol measurements according to the claim being validated, not only according to prediction uncertainty.

stat.AP↗
arXiv2026

Identifying Damage Pathways Linking Sequence Composition to Storage Failure in DNA Data Storage via High-Dimensional Mediation Analysis

DNA data storage offers extraordinary information density and long-term durability, but its reliability is limited by sequence-dependent errors introduced during synthesis and accumulated during storage. It remains unclear how sequence composition is associated with storage failure through specific molecular damage components. We develop a high-dimensional semiparametric mediation framework for survival outcomes. GC content is treated as the exposure, a high-dimensional baseline damage spectrum (a vector of per-read damage counts stratified by trinucleotide context and error type) as the mediator, and storage-quality failure as the outcome. Nonlinear covariate effects in both the mediator and survival models are approximated using deep neural networks. A three-step procedure combining product-of-coefficients screening, Smoothly Clipped Absolute Deviation (SCAD) penalized estimation, and joint significance testing is developed for mediator selection and inference. Applied to an aging experiment on electrochemically synthesized DNA, the method identifies 14 significant mediators, all corresponding to single-base deletions, with estimated mediated effects concentrated in trinucleotide contexts ending in C. These results reveal deletion-type damage as a major pathway linking sequence composition to reduced archival reliability and suggest candidate sequence features for future optimization and error-control strategies. The proposed framework thus offers a mechanism-oriented statistical approach for understanding and improving the reliability of DNA data storage.

stat.AP↗
arXiv2026

Comparing statistical learning models in wastewater-based epidemiology: An application to norovirus

Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) is an increasingly important tool for infectious disease surveillance, but there has been limited direct comparison of modelling approaches for predicting pathogen concentrations across space and time. We compare the predictive performance of six modelling approaches using norovirus in England as a case study, considering 3,232 wastewater samples from 152 sewage treatment works collected between May 2021 and March 2022 as part of the UK Environmental Monitoring for Health Protection programme. The benchmark was a Bayesian spatio-temporal model using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation (INLA) with the Stochastic Partial Differential Equation approach (SPDE), compared with Lasso regression, Generalised Additive Models (GAM), Bayesian GAM, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Random Forest. Models were evaluated using 10-fold spatial-block cross-validation with metrics including mean squared error, bias, correlation, empirical coverage of 95% prediction intervals, interval score, and computational cost. Random Forest was the best overall performing model, achieving the best interval score and nearest to nominal empirical coverage (95.3%), while maintaining point prediction accuracy comparable to XGBoost. The INLA-SPDE model also performed well, with near-nominal empirical coverage, the third best interval score, and consistently low bias across all evaluated metrics. Comparing predicted spatio-temporal trends, both models yielded similar spatial patterns but notable differences in uncertainty estimation. Our findings highlight a trade-off between predictive accuracy, uncertainty quantification, and computational efficiency. Ensemble machine learning methods are well suited to rapid prediction, whereas Bayesian geostatistical models remain valuable when probabilistic decision support is a priority for public health surveillance

stat.AP↗