Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.22223

Spending Scarce Confirmatory PET Measurements: Target-Aligned Validation in A4/LEARN

Eliuvish Han Cui
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Anti-amyloid therapies and blood-based biomarkers are changing Alzheimer disease workups into a two-stage measurement workflow: screen broadly with cheaper information, then spend scarce confirmatory amyloid measurements where they support the decision that will be reported. Amyloid positron-emission tomography (PET) remains one such protocol measurement for amyloid burden, but PET slots, trial budgets, and payer-facing evidence packages are finite. This paper asks a deliberately operational question: when is simple transparent PET validation enough, and when is a fitted residual-uncertainty score worth the added complexity? For a weighted protocol target, the first-order value of validating subject i is the product of target influence and residual protocol uncertainty. Generic uncertainty sampling uses only the second factor and can spend PET measurements on subjects that are hard to predict but weak for the scientific, clinical, or commercial claim. We apply this rule to the A4/LEARN PET archive, treating observed PET as a design laboratory for scarce-confirmation studies. For the primary APOE4 carrier versus non-carrier contrast in Centiloid 24-or-higher PET positivity, simple APOE4-balanced validation recovers nearly all of the target-specific gain: at PET budget 200, the confidence-interval width ratio relative to random validation is 0.923 for APOE4 balancing and 0.914 for target-specific scoring, while generic uncertainty sampling is 0.980. Other targets behave differently: target-specific scoring gives larger gains for an age-slope analysis and for cutoff-indexed PET positivity. The practical message is simple: spend scarce protocol measurements according to the claim being validated, not only according to prediction uncertainty.

Explore related subjects

stat.APcs.AIcs.LGstat.ML

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Eliuvish Han Cui. 2026-09-08. Spending Scarce Confirmatory PET Measurements: Target-Aligned Validation in A4/LEARN. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.22223

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.AI subjectcs.LG subjectstat.AP subjectstat.ML subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Distributed Lag Neural Additive Models

We introduce Distributed Lag Neural Additive Models (DLNAMs), neural-additive analogues of Distributed Lag Non-linear Models (DLNMs) for learning nonlinear effects distributed over lags. DLNAMs replace a prespecified spline cross-basis with neural components that learn exposure--lag response surfaces, avoiding choices of basis family, dimension, and knot placement while preserving additive interpretability and familiar distributed-lag summaries. Exp-centered input layers, smooth activations, and learned subnetwork mixtures produce smooth, locally adaptive representations; pointwise uncertainty combines a conditional last-layer Laplace approximation with between-member ensemble variation. In simulations, DLNAMs generally outperformed DLNM comparators, including penalized and treed variants, in recovering known response functions, with lower bias, stronger boundary recovery, and better-calibrated cumulative intervals; gains were largest for more demanding functions. The architecture performed consistently across sample sizes, outcome families, lag horizons, and jointly fitted multi-exposure settings, retaining recovery performance as exposures were added; fit-specific changes were largely confined to optimization, and applications recovered established empirical patterns.

stat.ML↗
arXiv2026

Diffusion Distillation for Efficient Weather Ensembles

Diffusion models generate skillful weather ensembles but require costly iterative sampling. We introduce a supervised energy-distance distillation method that compresses a multi-step diffusion teacher into a single-step student by aligning student forecasts with teacher samples and ground-truth observations. Experiments on global forecasting and typhoon-track prediction show that our student outperforms existing distillation methods and preserves skill for extreme events. It matches or surpasses the teacher across key metrics using only one neural function evaluation per autoregressive step.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Statistical versus machine learning-based spatial interpolation of post-processed ensemble weather forecasts

Statistical post-processing improves ensemble weather forecasts, but generating calibrated predictions at locations without observations remains challenging. This study compares statistical and machine-learning-based methods for post-processing ECMWF 2-m temperature and 10-m wind speed forecasts at observed and unobserved stations in Germany. We consider EMOS-based approaches, distributional regression networks, Transformers, and graph neural networks under both limited and extended predictor settings. For temperature, we also investigate linear forecast combinations and propose an altitude-aware linear pool (ALP). The results show that post-processing improves upon the raw ensemble in most settings, but no single method performs best across all variables, station groups, and evaluation metrics. The proposed ALP provides a small but significant improvement over the standard linear pool at unobserved locations.

cs.LG↗