Quid Pro Quo allocations in Production-Inventory games

Luis Guardiola; Ana Meca; Justo Puerto

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2002.00953

Quid Pro Quo allocations in Production-Inventory games

Luis Guardiola·Ana Meca·Justo Puerto

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The concept of Owen point, introduced in Guardiola et al. (2009), is an appealing solution concept that for Production-Inventory games (PI-games) always belongs to their core. The Owen point allows all the players in the game to operate at minimum cost but it does not take into account the cost reduction induced by essential players over their followers (fans). Thus, it may be seen as an altruistic allocation for essential players what can be criticized. The aim this paper is two-fold: to study the structure and complexity of the core of PI-games and to introduce new core allocations for PI-games improving the weaknesses of the Owen point. Regarding the first goal, we advance further on the analysis of PI-games and we analyze its core structure and algorithmic complexity. Specifically, we prove that the number of extreme points of the core of PI-games is exponential on the number of players. On the other hand, we propose and characterize a new core-allocation, the Omega point, which compensates the essential players for their role on reducing the costs of their fans. Moreover, we define another solution concept, the Quid Pro Quo set (QPQ-set) of allocations, which is based on the Owen and Omega points. Among all the allocations in this set, we emphasize what we call the Solomonic QPQ allocation and we provide some necessary conditions for the coincidence of that allocation with the Shapley value and the Nucleolus.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT econ.TH

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Luis Guardiola, Ana Meca, Justo Puerto. 2020-02-03. Quid Pro Quo allocations in Production-Inventory games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.00953

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗