Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2006.12185

Examination of Community Sentiment Dynamics due to COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study from A State in Australia

Jianlong Zhou·Shuiqiao Yang·Chun Xiao·Fang Chen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The outbreak of the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused unprecedented impacts to people's daily life around the world. Various measures and policies such as lockdown and social-distancing are implemented by governments to combat the disease during the pandemic period. These measures and policies as well as virus itself may cause different mental health issues to people such as depression, anxiety, sadness, etc. In this paper, we exploit the massive text data posted by Twitter users to analyse the sentiment dynamics of people living in the state of New South Wales (NSW) in Australia during the pandemic period. Different from the existing work that mostly focuses the country-level and static sentiment analysis, we analyse the sentiment dynamics at the fine-grained local government areas (LGAs). Based on the analysis of around 94 million tweets that posted by around 183 thousand users located at different LGAs in NSW in five months, we found that people in NSW showed an overall positive sentimental polarity and the COVID-19 pandemic decreased the overall positive sentimental polarity during the pandemic period. The fine-grained analysis of sentiment in LGAs found that despite the dominant positive sentiment most of days during the study period, some LGAs experienced significant sentiment changes from positive to negative. This study also analysed the sentimental dynamics delivered by the hot topics in Twitter such as government policies (e.g. the Australia's JobKeeper program, lockdown, social-distancing) as well as the focused social events (e.g. the Ruby Princess Cruise). The results showed that the policies and events did affect people's overall sentiment, and they affected people's overall sentiment differently at different stages.

Explore related subjects

cs.SIcs.CL

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jianlong Zhou, Shuiqiao Yang, Chun Xiao, Fang Chen. 2021-07-24. Examination of Community Sentiment Dynamics due to COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study from A State in Australia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00596-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Benefit of Collective Intelligence in Community-Based Content Moderation is Limited by Overt Political Signalling

Social media platforms face increasing scrutiny over the rapid spread of misinformation. In response, many have adopted community-based content moderation systems, including Community Notes (formerly Birdwatch) on X (formerly Twitter), Community Notes on Meta, and Footnotes on TikTok. However, research shows that the current design of these systems can allow political biases to influence both the development of notes and the rating processes, reducing their overall effectiveness. We hypothesise that enabling users to collaborate on writing notes, rather than relying solely on individually authored notes, can enhance the overall quality of their notes. To test this idea, we conducted an online experiment in which participants jointly authored notes on politically misleading posts. We find that collaboration improves the helpfulness of notes, although the average effect depends on the interactional context. In particular, the benefits of collaboration decline when participants are made aware of one another's political affiliations. We also find that politically diverse teams improve note quality when evaluating Republican posts, while team composition does not meaningfully affect note quality for Democrat posts. These findings underscore the complexity of community-based content moderation and highlight the importance of understanding group dynamics and political diversity when designing more effective moderation systems.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

The Same Ledger, Different Verdicts: How Measurement Specification Determines On-Chain Concentration

Whether a public blockchain is "decentralized" is routinely settled by citing a concentration statistic. On two ERC-20 ledgers, Chainlink (LINK) and Uniswap (UNI) over a 90-day window, we show that verdict depends on measurement specification rather than the ledger itself. Four discretionary choices (holder population, address type, temporal aggregation, and entity resolution) move the balance HHI for UNI from 109 to 2,336 (a factor of 21), with every specification defensible. Over the same range, the Gini coefficient moves by less than 0.003 and does not change under entity resolution, demonstrating that Gini and HHI answer different questions and cannot substitute for one another. We further document an implementation choice - summing versus overwriting repeated transfers - that discards roughly 85% of volume and overturns a finding on wealth and structural position. Substantively, both ledgers are extraordinarily unequal in ownership (balance Gini = 0.990 and 0.998) yet unconcentrated in routing (weekly flow HHI = 421 and 386), with the two dimensions close to statistically independent across addresses. A parameterized criterion for hidden brokers identifies 30 and 18 zero-balance intermediaries, 12 shared across ledgers; a matched control confirms that degree thresholding, rather than learned embeddings, drives the discovery. Finally, on the governance ledger, proposal-eligible addresses and routing intermediaries are almost disjoint, so routing contestability is held at the pleasure of a rule layer with a Nakamoto coefficient of two. We conclude that on-chain concentration should be reported as a specified range rather than a point estimate.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

Optimal and heuristic strategies for evaluating the influence of coordinated behavior in information cascades and retweet networks

Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior (CIB) has become a major concern in online social platforms, yet its actual impact on information diffusion remains poorly understood. Existing research has primarily focused on detecting coordinated activity, while comparatively little attention has been devoted to quantifying its influence once detected. In this work, we introduce two complementary frameworks for the post-hoc evaluation of coordinated accounts. First, we formulate the problem on information cascades as a constrained influence maximization problem over directed trees and develop a polynomial-time dynamic programming algorithm that computes the optimal placement of coordinated nodes, providing an upper bound on their achievable influence. Second, motivated by the limited availability of diffusion cascades in real-world platforms, we propose a network-based framework that estimates influence directly from retweet networks using the independent cascade model and compares the observed placement of coordinated accounts against established heuristic baselines. We evaluate both approaches on Twitter/X data from the 2019 UK General Election and on a collection of verified state-backed information operation campaigns spanning multiple countries. While coordinated accounts exhibit limited influence in the UK cascades, the network-based analysis reveals substantial differences across campaigns, with several operations achieving influence comparable to or exceeding that of structurally central seed sets. Finally, by reconstructing cascades from the retweet networks, we show that the two frameworks produce consistent results, suggesting that the observed effects reflect intrinsic structural properties of coordinated activity rather than artifacts of the underlying methodology.

cs.SI↗