Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2008.09263

Empirical Likelihood Covariate Adjustment for Regression Discontinuity Designs

Abstract

This paper proposes a versatile covariate adjustment method that directly incorporates covariate balance in regression discontinuity (RD) designs. The new empirical entropy balancing method reweights the standard local polynomial RD estimator by using the entropy balancing weights that minimize the Kullback--Leibler divergence from the uniform weights while satisfying the covariate balance constraints. Our estimator can be formulated as an empirical likelihood estimator that efficiently incorporates the information from the covariate balance condition as correctly specified over-identifying moment restrictions, and thus has an asymptotic variance no larger than that of the standard estimator without covariates. We demystify the asymptotic efficiency gain of Calonico, Cattaneo, Farrell, and Titiunik (2019)'s regression-based covariate-adjusted estimator, as their estimator has the same asymptotic variance as ours. Further efficiency improvement from balancing over sieve spaces is possible if our entropy balancing weights are computed using stronger covariate balance constraints that are imposed on functions of covariates. We then show that our method enjoys favorable second-order properties from empirical likelihood estimation and inference: the estimator has a small (bounded) nonlinearity bias, and the likelihood ratio based confidence set admits a simple analytical correction that can be used to improve coverage accuracy. The coverage accuracy of our confidence set is robust against slight perturbation to the covariate balance condition, which may happen in cases such as data contamination and misspecified "unaffected" outcomes used as covariates. The proposed entropy balancing approach for covariate adjustment is applicable to other RD-related settings.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jun Ma, Zhengfei Yu. 2020-08-21. Empirical Likelihood Covariate Adjustment for Regression Discontinuity Designs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.09263

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM