Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2103.12506

A Survey on Predicting the Factuality and the Bias of News Media

Preslav Nakov·Husrev Taha Sencar·Jisun An·Haewoon Kwak
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The present level of proliferation of fake, biased, and propagandistic content online has made it impossible to fact-check every single suspicious claim or article, either manually or automatically. Thus, many researchers are shifting their attention to higher granularity, aiming to profile entire news outlets, which makes it possible to detect likely "fake news" the moment it is published, by simply checking the reliability of its source. Source factuality is also an important element of systems for automatic fact-checking and "fake news" detection, as they need to assess the reliability of the evidence they retrieve online. Political bias detection, which in the Western political landscape is about predicting left-center-right bias, is an equally important topic, which has experienced a similar shift towards profiling entire news outlets. Moreover, there is a clear connection between the two, as highly biased media are less likely to be factual; yet, the two problems have been addressed separately. In this survey, we review the state of the art on media profiling for factuality and bias, arguing for the need to model them jointly. We further discuss interesting recent advances in using different information sources and modalities, which go beyond the text of the articles the target news outlet has published. Finally, we discuss current challenges and outline future research directions.

Explore related subjects

cs.SIcs.CL

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Preslav Nakov, Husrev Taha Sencar, Jisun An, Haewoon Kwak. 2021-03-16. A Survey on Predicting the Factuality and the Bias of News Media. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.12506

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Finding Common Ground: Graded Communal Knowledge in Bluesky Starter Packs

Communication is made possible by common ground---the unspoken knowledge that people share and presuppose of one another, whether that be online or offline. In his conception of common ground, Clark (1996) distinguishes between personal and communal common ground, and asserts that the latter is graded: the more community affiliations two people share, the more common ground they share as well. Social media research has invoked this mechanism to explain how users connect, but it has gone largely untested because community memberships are rarely visible and, where they are, they are coupled to user interactions in a way that leads to conflating effects. To circumvent these challenges, this study repurposes Bluesky starter packs (SPs) as user-curated community affiliation labels. Across 191,648 pairs of users, we show that shared lexical repertoire---our proxy for common ground---grows monotonically with the number of SPs that users share, with users sharing a single pack being roughly twice as similar as equally connected strangers. A semantic renormalization of SP co-membership shows furthermore that it is more so the number of topically \emph{distinct} communities, rather than the raw count, in which common ground is graded. Finally, we show that community co-membership adds to common ground independently of proximity in the Bluesky follow network. These results lead to the conclusion that community membership is a measurable, separable, and semantically structured carrier of common ground. Reading it as such makes common ground observable before an exchange rather than inferred from it, and thus opens the door for large-scale observational approaches to a set of questions that have so far only been posed in the laboratory.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

Converging Naming Styles, Persistent Network Locality: GitHub in the LLM Era

Social conventions often emerge through repeated interactions within social networks, allowing shared practices to coexist with variation across groups. Large language models (LLMs) introduce a potentially different coordination structure: a small number of widely used models can expose socially distant users to similar patterns and suggestions. Whether broad convergence under such shared technological influences eliminates network-local variation remains unclear. We examine this question in software development, where identifier naming styles provide observable conventions and LLM-based tools have rapidly diffused. Using public GitHub repositories created between 2015 and September 2025 across six programming languages, we characterize naming styles with 27 features and examine their association with detected LLM-related commits, their diversity across repository creation cohorts, and their relationship to owner proximity in a large-scale collaboration network. Repositories with detected LLM-related commits tend to use longer identifiers and, in several languages, make greater use of naming patterns already prevalent within the language. We also observe lower naming-style diversity in recent creation cohorts, with marked declines appearing around 2023-2024 in several languages, although their timing and trajectories differ. At the same time, network locality persists: in five of the six languages, repositories whose owners are closer in the collaboration network remain more similar in naming style even among recent, more homogeneous cohorts. These findings show that aggregate convergence and network-local variation can coexist, highlighting the need to examine not only how much cultural variation remains, but also how that variation continues to be structured by human social relationships in the era of widely shared AI systems.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

Heterogeneous Interaction Network Analysis (HINA): A New Learning Analytics Approach for Modelling, Analyzing, and Visualizing Complex Interactions in Learning Processes

Existing learning analytics approaches, which often model learning processes as sequences of learner actions or homogeneous relationships, are limited in capturing the distributed, multi-typed interactions in contemporary learning environments. To address this, we propose Heterogeneous Interaction Network Analysis (HINA), a multi-level learning analytics framework for modelling interactions and associations across diverse entities (e.g., learners, behaviours, and AI agents) in learning processes. Grounded in network science principles, HINA integrates a multi-level analytical framework that analyzes individual process metrics (node-level), prominent associations (dyad-level), and latent clusters (meso-level) to address questions about how different elements in a learning environment interact and co-influence each other. In this paper, we first detail the theoretical and mathematical foundations of HINA for individual, dyadic, and meso-level analysis. We then demonstrate HINA's utility through a case study on AI-assisted small-group collaborative learning, revealing students' interaction profiles with peers versus AI, distinct engagement patterns that emerge from these interactions, and specific types of learning behaviors (e.g., asking questions) directed to AI versus peers. HINA contributes a novel and unified analytical framework that enables researchers to quantify individual-level processes, identify significant associations, and uncover meaningful clusters within a single workflow. Accompanied by a dedicated web tool, HINA provides a complete workflow for supporting process-based assessment, and enables a new theoretical lens for modeling and understanding complex and mediated learning processes.

cs.SI↗