Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2112.10542

Heckman-Selection or Two-Part models for alcohol studies? Depends

Reka Sundaram-Stukel
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Aims: To re-introduce the Heckman model as a valid empirical technique in alcohol studies. Design: To estimate the determinants of problem drinking using a Heckman and a two-part estimation model. Psychological and neuro-scientific studies justify my underlying estimation assumptions and covariate exclusion restrictions. Higher order tests checking for multicollinearity validate the use of Heckman over the use of two-part estimation models. I discuss the generalizability of the two models in applied research. Settings and Participants: Two pooled national population surveys from 2016 and 2017 were used: the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFS), and the National Survey of Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). Measurements: Participation in problem drinking and meeting the criteria for problem drinking. Findings: Both U.S. national surveys perform well with the Heckman model and pass all higher order tests. The Heckman model corrects for selection bias and reveals the direction of bias, where the two-part model does not. For example, the coefficients on age are upward biased and unemployment is downward biased in the two-part where the Heckman model does not have a selection bias. Covariate exclusion restrictions are sensitive to survey conditions and are contextually generalizable. Conclusions: The Heckman model can be used for alcohol (smoking studies as well) if the underlying estimation specification passes higher order tests for multicollinearity and the exclusion restrictions are justified with integrity for the data used. Its use is merit-worthy because it corrects for and reveals the direction and the magnitude of selection bias where the two-part does not.

Explore related subjects

econ.EM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Reka Sundaram-Stukel. 2023-06-29. Heckman-Selection or Two-Part models for alcohol studies? Depends. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.10542

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Testing for Monotone Equilibrium Strategies in Games of Incomplete Information

This paper develops a unified framework for testing monotonicity of Bayesian Nash equilibrium strategies in unobserved types in games of incomplete information. We show that, under symmetric independent private types, monotonicity of differentiable equilibrium strategies is equivalent to monotonicity of a quasi-inverse strategy identified from observed actions. This allows the problem to be reformulated as testing a countable set of moment inequalities involving unconditional expectations. We propose a Cramer-von Mises-type statistic with bootstrap critical values. The method accommodates covariates and game heterogeneity. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate finite-sample performance, and an application to procurement auctions illustrates cartel detection.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Ordinal Distributional Change and Conservative Transition Benchmarks: Measurement, Identification, and Inference

Repeated cross-sections reveal changes in ordinal distributions but not the transitions producing them. I axiomatically characterize a threshold-weighted probability metric for ordinal change from threshold-crossing principles. For any threshold-additive ordinal geometry, the discrepancy coincides with the Wasserstein--1 distance induced by that ground metric and measures minimum displacement; its optimizing plans define conservative transition benchmarks. With missing outcomes, I derive sharp identified sets for the discrepancy and endpoint-conditioned benchmark plans. I develop finite-sample-valid projection inference using randomized Monte Carlo calibration and global search with an almost-sure convergence guarantee. Applied to Arab Barometer data, the framework documents a robust shift toward broader and more regular remittance receipt in Lebanon. The discrepancy interval remains well separated from zero after allowing for item nonresponse and sampling uncertainty, while benchmark bounds provide strong numerical evidence that least-displacement restructuring excludes movement toward less frequent receipt and requires reassignment from nonreceipt to recurrent receipt.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

A Stochastic Nested Fixed Point Algorithm for Large-Scale BLP Estimation

We develop a stochastic nested fixed point (SNFP) estimator for random coefficients logit demand models that updates model parameters using stochastic gradients and performs demand inversion one market at a time. Relative to the conventional nested fixed point (NFP) estimator, SNFP substantially reduces memory requirements and computational cost, making estimation feasible in very large datasets. We establish the large-$T$ (number of markets) asymptotic properties of the estimator under regularity conditions. We also characterize the effect of sharing one block of simulation draws across markets and show how to correct for it. Monte Carlo simulations show that the SNFP estimator achieves statistical accuracy comparable to the NFP estimator, and in our benchmark a single online pass estimates a model with 100 million markets in about 5.5 hours. An empirical application using scanner data further demonstrates the practical advantages of SNFP for large-scale demand estimation.

econ.EM↗