Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2203.09655

Hedonic Games With Friends, Enemies, and Neutrals: Resolving Open Questions and Fine-Grained Complexity

Jiehua Chen·Gergely Csáji·Sanjukta Roy·Sofia Simola
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We investigate verification and existence problems for prominent stability concepts in hedonic games with friends, enemies, and optionally with neutrals [8, 16]. We resolve several (long-standing) open questions [4, 16, 20, 23] and show that for friend-oriented preferences, under the friends and enemies model, it is coNP-complete to verify whether a given agent partition is (strictly) core stable, while under the friends, enemies, and neutrals model, it is NP-complete to determine whether an individual stable partition exists. We further look into natural restricted cases from the literature, such as when the friends and enemies relationships are symmetric, when the initial coalitions have bounded size, when the vertex degree in the friendship graph (resp. the union of friendship and enemy graph) is bounded, or when such graph is acyclic or close to being acyclic. We obtain a complete (parameterized) complexity picture regarding these cases.

Explore related subjects

cs.GTcs.MA

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jiehua Chen, Gergely Csáji, Sanjukta Roy, Sofia Simola. 2023-03-01. Hedonic Games With Friends, Enemies, and Neutrals: Resolving Open Questions and Fine-Grained Complexity. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.09655

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Learning in Structured Stackelberg Games

We initiate the study of structured Stackelberg games, a novel form of strategic interaction between a leader and a follower where contextual information can be predictive of the follower's (unknown) type. Motivated by applications such as security games and AI safety, we show how this additional structure can help the leader learn a utility-maximizing policy in both the online and distributional settings. In the online setting, we first prove that standard learning-theoretic measures of complexity do not characterize the difficulty of the leader's learning task. Notably, we find that there exists a learning-theoretic measure of complexity, analogous to the Littlestone dimension in online classification, that tightly characterizes the leader's instance-optimal regret. We term this the Stackelberg-Littlestone dimension, and leverage it to provide a provably optimal online learning algorithm. In the distributional setting, we provide analogous results by showing that two new dimensions control the sample complexity upper- and lower-bound.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Equilibrium and Infeasibility: A new solution concept for games

Addressing infeasibility in non-cooperative games has become an important topic, as many problems across different applications face this issue. In this paper, we propose a new solution concept for generalized games with possibly infeasible individual constraints. A solution is defined as the limit of a sequence of generalized Nash equilibria induced by games with penalty terms relaxing the individual constraints. Existence is established for a broad range of games and we provide conditions allowing to characterize a $ψ$-penalized solution as a strategy profile maximizing every player's utility over all her penalty minimizing strategies. A variation of Divide-the-Dollar serves as an illustrative example. We further establish the compatibility with the GNE and the solution to the Nash bargaining.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Subgame-Perfect Nash Equilibria of Plurality Voting with Abstention: a PSPACE-Completeness Result for Restricted Ballots

We consider sequential Plurality elections in which each voter may abstain or vote for a single candidate. Each voter assigns utilities to all candidates; for each voter, this induces a (weak) order over the candidates. Ties are resolved uniformly at random, and voting has a small positive cost, so that a voter prefers to abstain when their vote cannot change the election outcome. We consider a variant of this model where, for each voter, we additionally specify a prefix of her ranking, so that she is only allowed to vote for a candidate from that prefix (or abstain). We prove that for this variant of the model, deciding whether a designated candidate is among the election winners in a subgame-perfect equilibrium of the associated extensive-form game is PSPACE-complete. This partially resolves an open problem from the work of Desmedt and Elkind [2010].

cs.GT↗