Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2207.03178

Evolutionary Stability of Other-Regarding Preferences Under Complexity Costs

Anthony DiGiovanni·Nicolas Macé·Jesse Clifton
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The evolution of preferences that account for other agents' fitness, or other-regarding preferences, has been modeled with the "indirect approach" to evolutionary game theory. Under the indirect evolutionary approach, agents make decisions by optimizing a subjective utility function. Evolution may select for subjective preferences that differ from the fitness function, and in particular, subjective preferences for increasing or reducing other agents' fitness. However, indirect evolutionary models typically artificially restrict the space of strategies that agents might use (assuming that agents always play a Nash equilibrium under their subjective preferences), and dropping this restriction can undermine the finding that other-regarding preferences are selected for. Can the indirect evolutionary approach still be used to explain the apparent existence of other-regarding preferences, like altruism, in humans? We argue that it can, by accounting for the costs associated with the complexity of strategies, giving (to our knowledge) the first account of the relationship between strategy complexity and the evolution of preferences. Our model formalizes the intuition that agents face tradeoffs between the cognitive costs of strategies and how well they interpolate across contexts. For a single game, these complexity costs lead to selection for a simple fixed-action strategy, but across games, when there is a sufficiently large cost to a strategy's number of context-specific parameters, a strategy of maximizing subjective (other-regarding) utility is stable again. Overall, our analysis provides a more nuanced picture of when other-regarding preferences will evolve.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anthony DiGiovanni, Nicolas Macé, Jesse Clifton. 2023-01-18. Evolutionary Stability of Other-Regarding Preferences Under Complexity Costs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.03178

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Robust Information Design with Heterogeneous Beliefs in Bayesian Congestion Games

In many engineered systems, agents make decisions under incomplete information, creating opportunities for a planner to influence decentralized behavior through signaling. We study how such signaling can be designed in parallel-network, affine latency congestion games when users may not interpret recommendations using the same beliefs assumed by the planner. To do so, we consider Bayesian congestion games with private recommendations and formulate a robust information design problem in which obedience must hold uniformly over a neighborhood of a nominal prior. This addresses the previously uncharacterized issue of whether obedience itself remains reliable under belief heterogeneity, rather than only under the single prior used at the design stage. We characterize policy-level robustness radii, identify regimes in which the robust obedience region remains nonempty, and analyze the resulting robustness--performance tradeoff through a robust value function whose optimal cost is monotone in the robustness requirement and whose local sensitivity is governed by the active obedience constraints.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Core stability recognition for minimum-cost spanning tree games: Parameterized perspective

Minimum-cost spanning tree game (MSTG) is a cooperative game played on an undirected edge-weighted graph $(G,w)$ representing the network, where each vertex corresponds to a player and each edge has an associated cost~$w$. A distinguished vertex $s \in V(G)$ represents the supply or source. For any coalition of players $S$, the characteristic cost function $c(S)$ is defined as the minimum cost of a spanning tree with respect to $w$, connecting exactly the vertices in $S \cup \{s\}$. In this paper we study the computational complexity of deciding core membership for MSTG. In general, deciding whether a given allocation is in the core is \textsf{coNP}-hard~(Faigle et al.,International Journal of Game Theory,1997). We study the core recognition problem under the name {\sc MSTG Core Non-Membership}. We extend the hardness to graphs which are very close to being planar. On the positive side, we present several algorithmic results within the framework of parameterized complexity. We show that {\sc MSTG Core Non-Membership} is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the support size of the allocation. Turning into structural parameters of graphs, we show that the problem admits an FPT algorithm parameterized by treewidth and signed neighborhood diversity. Last but not least, we investigate kernelization. While in general graphs, under standard complexity-theoretical assumptions, {\sc MSTG Core Non-Membership} does not admit a polynomial kernel parameterized by the vertex cover number, we design a cubic kernel in planar graphs. Furthermore, in general graphs, we obtain quadratic kernel for signed neighborhood diversity and linear kernel for the parameter feedback edge number.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Condorcet-type properties of the linear ordering problem with ties

The Kemeny rule aggregates multiple strict rankings into a single strict ranking that minimizes the sum of its distances from the input rankings. The resulting optimization problem, called the Kemeny problem (\texttt{KP}), is a special case of the linear ordering problem (\texttt{LOP}). The Kemeny rule satisfies several desirable properties in social choice theory, including the extended Condorcet criterion (\texttt{XCC}). Ando et al. strengthened this result by introducing the strong Condorcet criterion (\texttt{SCC}) and showing that it holds for every optimal solution to an arbitrary \texttt{LOP} instance. Yoo and Escobedo extended the Kemeny rule to rankings with ties and showed that the resulting rule satisfies the non-strict extended Condorcet criterion (\texttt{NXCC}). This criterion gives a condition under which one candidate must be ranked strictly above another in every optimal solution. In this paper, we introduce the non-strict strong Condorcet criterion (\texttt{NSCC}), a counterpart of the \texttt{SCC} for rankings with ties, and show that it holds for every optimal solution to an arbitrary instance of the linear ordering problem with ties (\texttt{LOPT}). We also establish a complementary structural property that gives conditions under which two candidates must be tied in every optimal solution to an arbitrary \texttt{LOPT} instance.

cs.GT↗