Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2209.04770

Testing the martingale difference hypothesis in high dimension

Jinyuan Chang·Qing Jiang·Xiaofeng Shao
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, we consider testing the martingale difference hypothesis for high-dimensional time series. Our test is built on the sum of squares of the element-wise max-norm of the proposed matrix-valued nonlinear dependence measure at different lags. To conduct the inference, we approximate the null distribution of our test statistic by Gaussian approximation and provide a simulation-based approach to generate critical values. The asymptotic behavior of the test statistic under the alternative is also studied. Our approach is nonparametric as the null hypothesis only assumes the time series concerned is martingale difference without specifying any parametric forms of its conditional moments. As an advantage of Gaussian approximation, our test is robust to the cross-series dependence of unknown magnitude. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first valid test for the martingale difference hypothesis that not only allows for large dimension but also captures nonlinear serial dependence. The practical usefulness of our test is illustrated via simulation and a real data analysis. The test is implemented in a user-friendly R-function.

Explore related subjects

econ.EMstat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jinyuan Chang, Qing Jiang, Xiaofeng Shao. 2022-10-01. Testing the martingale difference hypothesis in high dimension. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2022.09.001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Inference for Treatment Effects Conditional on Generalized Principal Strata using Instrumental Variables

We propose a general approach to inference for a broad class of models that arise in the analysis of treatment effects with discrete-valued treatments and instruments and a general-valued outcome. In addition to instrument exogeneity, the main substantive assumption in our class of models rules out certain response types by assuming that they occur with probability zero. Here, the response type refers to the vector of potential outcomes and potential treatments, and we refer to a set of possible values for the response type as a generalized principal stratum. Through a series of examples, we show that this framework encompasses a wide variety of assumptions that have been considered in the previous literature. Our framework allows inference on any treatment effect parameter that can be expressed as the expectation of a function of the response type conditional on a generalized principal stratum. We develop methods for inference on such parameters under these assumptions, as well as methods for testing the validity of the assumptions themselves. A key result of our analysis is a characterization of the identified set for such parameters under these assumptions and the testable restrictions for the assumptions themselves in terms of existence of a nonnegative solution to linear systems of equations with a special structure. We propose methods for inference exploiting this special structure and recent results in Fang et al. (2023).

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Raking for estimation and inference in panel models with nonignorable attrition and refreshment

In panel data subject to nonignorable attrition, auxiliary (refreshment) sampling may restore full identification under weak assumptions on the attrition process. Despite their generality, these identification strategies have seen limited empirical use, largely because the implied estimation procedure requires solving a functional minimization problem for the target density. When the distributions of the observed data are parametric, we show that this problem can be solved using the iterative proportional fitting (raking) algorithm, which converges rapidly even with continuous data. The resulting density estimator is then used as input into a parametric moment condition. We establish consistency and convergence rates for both the raking-based density estimator and the resulting moment estimator. We also derive a simple recursive procedure for estimating the asymptotic variance. Finally, we demonstrate the satisfactory performance of our estimator in simulations and provide an empirical illustration using data from the Understanding America Study panel.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Summary Indices in Treatment Effect Estimation

This paper studies the practice of combining multiple outcomes into a summary index to estimate a causal effect. For common estimators and index constructions, the estimate equals a weighted sum of the estimated effects on the components, with weights that are implicit and rarely reported. The paper derives the weights and shows that, for inverse-covariance-weighted indices, they can be negative and unrestricted in magnitude, so the index effect can have the opposite sign to every component effect. The paper proposes two procedures for valid inference on the index effect: a variance estimator that accounts for the data-dependent weights, and a shifted t-test that requires no such correction. Conventional t-tests of the null of no effect remain valid. Contrary to common claims, summary indices do not generally improve power. Three published studies illustrate the results.

econ.EM↗