Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2212.05357

On Blockchain We Cooperate: An Evolutionary Game Perspective

Abstract

Cooperation is fundamental for human prosperity. Blockchain, as a trust machine, is a cooperative institution in cyberspace that supports cooperation through distributed trust with consensus protocols. While studies in computer science focus on fault tolerance problems with consensus algorithms, economic research utilizes incentive designs to analyze agent behaviors. To achieve cooperation on blockchains, emerging interdisciplinary research introduces rationality and game-theoretical solution concepts to study the equilibrium outcomes of various consensus protocols. However, existing studies do not consider the possibility for agents to learn from historical observations. Therefore, we abstract a general consensus protocol as a dynamic game environment, apply a solution concept of bounded rationality to model agent behavior, and resolve the initial conditions for three different stable equilibria. In our game, agents imitatively learn the global history in an evolutionary process toward equilibria, for which we evaluate the outcomes from both computing and economic perspectives in terms of safety, liveness, validity, and social welfare. Our research contributes to the literature across disciplines, including distributed consensus in computer science, game theory in economics on blockchain consensus, evolutionary game theory at the intersection of biology and economics, bounded rationality at the interplay between psychology and economics, and cooperative AI with joint insights into computing and social science. Finally, we discuss that future protocol design can better achieve the most desired outcomes of our honest stable equilibria by increasing the reward-punishment ratio and lowering both the cost-punishment ratio and the pivotality rate.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Luyao Zhang, Xinyu Tian. 2023-01-19. On Blockchain We Cooperate: An Evolutionary Game Perspective. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.05357

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Burst Market: The Next Leap for Humanity

Many useful human contributions remain unexchanged because exchange frictions exceed their value. This conceptual paper proposes the Burst Market (BM): a market for brief, paid, immediate human services delivered through live video. BM seeks to lower the minimum viable exchange through PIVOT: Provider-set price, Immediate access, Video interaction, Open participation, and Time-metered payment. A four-part friction map covers buyer access, provider market access, capability packaging, and assurance and governance. BM identifies seven rebalances, including AI job disruption versus underused human capability, and serves both scarce and underused capacity. As generative market infrastructure, BM may let people create services that established occupations and platforms cannot foresee. Seven conceptual propositions organize its mechanisms and predictions. If these effects emerge at scale, BM could represent the next leap for humanity.

econ.GN

Local Media and the Shaping of Social Norms: Evidence from the Ebola outbreak

Media's influence on norms and behavior is widely recognized. Less is known about the role played by media being local. I examine this in a high-stakes context, the Ebola outbreak in Guinea. I exploit quasi-random variation in access to radio and the timing of a public-health campaign aired on community radio. I find that 12-17% of Ebola cases could have been prevented if places with access to a neighboring community radio station had instead had their own. Impacts are driven by radio being local rather than by ethno-linguistic belonging. Local media facilitates coordination in behaviors observed and sanctioned locally.

econ.GN

A minimal model of money creation under regulatory constraints

We propose a minimal model of the secured interbank network able to shed light on recent money markets puzzles. We find that excess liquidity emerges due to the interactions between the reserves and liquidity ratio constraints; the appearance of evergreen repurchase agreements and collateral re-use emerges as a simple answer to banks' counterparty risk and liquidity ratio regulation. In line with prevailing theories, re-use increases with collateral scarcity. In our agent-based model, banks create money endogenously to meet the funding requests of economic agents. The latter generate payment shocks to the banking system by reallocating their deposits. Banks absorbs these shocks thanks to repurchase agreements, while respecting reserves, liquidity, and leverage constraints. The resulting network is denser and more robust to stress scenarios than an unsecured one; in addition, the stable bank trading relationships network exhibits a core-periphery structure. Finally, we show how this model can be used as a tool for stress testing and monetary policy design.

econ.GN