Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2301.06220

New bounds on the cardinality of Hausdorff spaces and regular spaces

Abstract

Using weaker versions of the cardinal function $\psi_c(X)$, we derive a series of new bounds for the cardinality of Hausdorff spaces and regular spaces that do not involve $\psi_c(X)$ nor its variants at all. For example, we show if $X$ is regular then $|X|\leq 2^{c(X)^{\pi\chi(X)}}$ and $|X|\leq 2^{c(X)\pi\chi(X)^{ot(X)}}$, where the cardinal function $ot(X)$, introduced by Tkachenko, has the property $ot(X)\leq\min\{t(X),c(X)\}$. It follows from the latter that a regular space with cellularity at most $\mathfrak{c}$ and countable $\pi$-character has cardinality at most $2^\mathfrak{c}$. For a Hausdorff space $X$ we show $|X|\leq 2^{d(X)^{\pi\chi(X)}}$, $|X|\leq d(X)^{\pi\chi(X)^{ot(X)}}$, and $|X|\leq 2^{\pi w(X)^{dot(X)}}$, where $dot(X)\leq\min\{ot(X),\pi\chi(X)\}$. None of these bounds involve $\psi_c(X)$ or $\psi(X)$. By introducing the cardinal functions $w\psi_c(X)$ and $d\psi_c(X)$ with the property $w\psi_c(X)d\psi_c(X)\leq\psi_c(X)$ for a Hausdorff space $X$, we show $|X|\leq\pi\chi(X)^{c(X)w\psi_c(X)}$ if $X$ is regular and $|X|\leq\pi\chi(X)^{c(X)d\psi_c(X)w\psi_c(X)}$ if $X$ is Hausdorff. This improves results of Sapirovskii and Sun. It is also shown that if $X$ is Hausdorff then $|X|\leq 2^{d(X)w\psi_c(X)}$, which appears to be new even in the case where $w\psi_c(X)$ is replaced with $\psi_c(X)$. Compact examples show that $\psi(X)$ cannot be replaced with $d\psi_c(X)w\psi_c(X)$ in the bound $2^{\psi(X)}$ for the cardinality of a compact Hausdorff space $X$. Likewise, $\psi(X)$ cannot be replaced with $d\psi_c(X)w\psi_c(X)$ in the Arhangel'skii-Sapirovskii bound $2^{L(X)t(X)\psi(X)}$ for the cardinality of a Hausdorff space $X$. Finally, we make several observations concerning homogeneous spaces in this connection.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Nathan Carlson. 2023-01-16. New bounds on the cardinality of Hausdorff spaces and regular spaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.06220

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN