Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2301.06631

Robust M-Estimation for Additive Single-Index Cointegrating Time Series Models

Abstract

Robust M-estimation uses loss functions, such as least absolute deviation (LAD), quantile loss and Huber's loss, to construct its objective function, in order to for example eschew the impact of outliers, whereas the difficulty in analysing the resultant estimators rests on the nonsmoothness of these losses. Generalized functions have advantages over ordinary functions in several aspects, especially generalized functions possess derivatives of any order. Generalized functions incorporate local integrable functions, the so-called regular generalized functions, while the so-called singular generalized functions (e.g. Dirac delta function) can be obtained as the limits of a sequence of sufficient smooth functions, so-called regular sequence in generalized function context. This makes it possible to use these singular generalized functions through approximation. Nevertheless, a significant contribution of this paper is to establish the convergence rate of regular sequence to nonsmooth loss that answers a call from the relevant literature. For parameter estimation where objective function may be nonsmooth, this paper first shows as a general paradigm that how generalized function approach can be used to tackle the nonsmooth loss functions in Section two using a very simple model. This approach is of general interest and applicability. We further use the approach in robust M-estimation for additive single-index cointegrating time series models; the asymptotic theory is established for the proposed estimators. We evaluate the finite-sample performance of the proposed estimation method and theory by both simulated data and an empirical analysis of predictive regression of stock returns.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chaohua Dong, Jiti Gao, Yundong Tu, Bin Peng. 2023-01-16. Robust M-Estimation for Additive Single-Index Cointegrating Time Series Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.06631

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Summary Indices in Treatment Effect Estimation

This paper studies the practice of combining multiple outcomes into a summary index to estimate a causal effect. For common estimators and index constructions, the estimate equals a weighted sum of the estimated effects on the components, with weights that are implicit and rarely reported. The paper derives the weights and shows that, for inverse-covariance-weighted indices, they can be negative and unrestricted in magnitude, so the index effect can have the opposite sign to every component effect. The paper proposes two procedures for valid inference on the index effect: a variance estimator that accounts for the data-dependent weights, and a shifted t-test that requires no such correction. Conventional t-tests of the null of no effect remain valid. Contrary to common claims, summary indices do not generally improve power. Three published studies illustrate the results.

econ.EM

The "Rough" HAR Model

This paper proposes discrete-time approximations to rough continuous-time models of realized variance (RV). The leading rough models can be viewed as autoregressive processes driven by fractional Gaussian noise. We show that the Wold representation of this noise concentrates its dependence at the first lag when the Hurst parameter is below one half. Augmenting the autoregressive (AR) and heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR) models with a first-order moving-average (MA(1)) component therefore approximates the roughness, and the MA coefficient maps almost linearly into the Hurst parameter. We refer to these extensions as the "rough" AR and "rough" HAR models. Estimating them on the log RV of ten ETFs, we find negative MA coefficients for every asset, and the implied Hurst parameters align closely with the estimates from the continuous-time models. In the HAR literature, the negative MA(1) component is a significant feature that has been largely overlooked. In out-of-sample comparisons, the "rough" models outperform their classical counterparts for nearly every asset and horizon, with the largest gains at short horizons, and their accuracy is comparable to that of the rough continuous-time models but much easier to estimate by standard off-the-shelf software.

econ.EM

Match forecasts in UEFA club competitions: Elo ratings versus Transfermarkt valuations

The pre-season strengths of European football clubs are usually measured by two proxies in the literature. Football Club Elo Ratings provide strictly performance-based Elo ratings from the early days of the European Cups, while Transfermarkt valuations are crowd-based estimates of squad market values. This paper compares them by evaluating their ability to forecast the results of matches played in the UEFA Champions League and the UEFA Europa League between the seasons 2020/21 and 2024/25. The two indicators yield almost identical out-of-sample accuracy when used separately. Combining the two measures leads to a modest improvement, but the best aggregation procedure is sensitive to the forecast target. Our results suggest that seeding based on Elo ratings would be (closely) optimal.

econ.EM