Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2303.06152

Why is That a Good or Not a Good Frying Pan? -- Knowledge Representation for Functions of Objects and Tools for Design Understanding, Improvement, and Generation

Seng-Beng Ho
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The understanding of the functional aspects of objects and tools is of paramount importance in supporting an intelligent system in navigating around in the environment and interacting with various objects, structures, and systems, to help fulfil its goals. A detailed understanding of functionalities can also lead to design improvements and novel designs that would enhance the operations of AI and robotic systems on the one hand, and human lives on the other. This paper demonstrates how a particular object - in this case, a frying pan - and its participation in the processes it is designed to support - in this case, the frying process - can be represented in a general function representational language and framework, that can be used to flesh out the processes and functionalities involved, leading to a deep conceptual understanding with explainability of functionalities that allows the system to answer "why" questions - why is something a good frying pan, say, or why a certain part on the frying pan is designed in a certain way? Or, why is something not a good frying pan? This supports the re-design and improvement on design of objects, artifacts, and tools, as well as the potential for generating novel designs that are functionally accurate, usable, and satisfactory.

Explore related subjects

cs.AI

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Seng-Beng Ho. 2023-03-10. Why is That a Good or Not a Good Frying Pan? -- Knowledge Representation for Functions of Objects and Tools for Design Understanding, Improvement, and Generation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.06152

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI↗