Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2304.11567

Differentiate ChatGPT-generated and Human-written Medical Texts

Wenxiong Liao·Zhengliang Liu·Haixing Dai·Shaochen Xu·Zihao Wu·Yiyang Zhang·Xiaoke Huang·Dajiang Zhu·Hongmin Cai·Tianming Liu·Xiang Li
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Background: Large language models such as ChatGPT are capable of generating grammatically perfect and human-like text content, and a large number of ChatGPT-generated texts have appeared on the Internet. However, medical texts such as clinical notes and diagnoses require rigorous validation, and erroneous medical content generated by ChatGPT could potentially lead to disinformation that poses significant harm to healthcare and the general public. Objective: This research is among the first studies on responsible and ethical AIGC (Artificial Intelligence Generated Content) in medicine. We focus on analyzing the differences between medical texts written by human experts and generated by ChatGPT, and designing machine learning workflows to effectively detect and differentiate medical texts generated by ChatGPT. Methods: We first construct a suite of datasets containing medical texts written by human experts and generated by ChatGPT. In the next step, we analyze the linguistic features of these two types of content and uncover differences in vocabulary, part-of-speech, dependency, sentiment, perplexity, etc. Finally, we design and implement machine learning methods to detect medical text generated by ChatGPT. Results: Medical texts written by humans are more concrete, more diverse, and typically contain more useful information, while medical texts generated by ChatGPT pay more attention to fluency and logic, and usually express general terminologies rather than effective information specific to the context of the problem. A BERT-based model can effectively detect medical texts generated by ChatGPT, and the F1 exceeds 95%.

Explore related subjects

cs.CLcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wenxiong Liao, Zhengliang Liu, Haixing Dai, Shaochen Xu, Zihao Wu, Yiyang Zhang, Xiaoke Huang, Dajiang Zhu, Hongmin Cai, Tianming Liu, Xiang Li. 2023-04-23. Differentiate ChatGPT-generated and Human-written Medical Texts. https://doi.org/10.2196/48904

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Metanym Game: An LLM Benchmark Without Ground Truth That Rises With the Models It Measures

We introduce a benchmark that is fully self-contained, needs no ground truth, and rises with the models it measures. Language models compete at making analogies and subjectively grade one another; nothing enters from outside. The benchmark reproduces GPQA Diamond, a keyed benchmark of expert-written questions, at r = 0.98, audited for a leak and found clean. We hypothesize that both benchmarks measure the same thing in different ways: a language model holds its knowledge as archetypal contexts, relationship patterns valid across many topic domains. GPQA instantiates the required knowledge in one domain; the Metanym Game instantiates one archetype into several domains, generating analogies, no reasoning required. The reasoning feature of an LLM hardly changes the game's ratings, while it lifts GPQA, which requires derivations. In the game, a player writes a context template whose slots, filled with a set of keywords from a topic domain, instantiate a factually true description of that domain; the instantiations are each other's metaphors, and keywords filling the same slot are metanyms, metaphorically synonymous. Correctness is settled sentence by sentence. Ground truth is replaced by the SVD of the factual rating matrix: its left and right singular vectors rate the players as judges and as generators, two ratings from one factorisation, to our knowledge a first for an LLM council of peers. On the subjective criteria, judges are weighted by their rating consistency under a swept calibration anchor. Generating and judging are different skills: on this roster the strongest generators were middling judges. A council of the five best issues the official ratings; its contestable seats keep it current, a candidate steering signal for self-improving AI. The paper is accompanied by a validating package that recomputes every number.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

SCoNE: Selective Context-aware Neuron Editing for Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is highly sensitive to retrieval noise: when retrieved documents mix informative and irrelevant context, LLMs are easily distracted, leading to hallucinations. To overcome this, we propose SCoNE (Selective Context-aware Neuron Editing), a training-free model editing approach that improves retrieval noise robustness by selectively strengthening context-aware FFN neurons that are identified by both high attribution and high cross-input variability. SCoNE requires only a small number of mining samples, no fine-tuning, and no inference-time overhead. Across various knowledge-intensive question-answering benchmarks and two LLM backbones, SCoNE consistently outperforms competitive baseline methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/HYU-ARK-Lab/SCoNE.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

COT-TTS: Audio Context-Aware Text-to-Speech with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Recently, text-to-speech systems have made significant progress in speech expressiveness and controllability. However, the speaking style of generated speech typically relies on clear user-specified instructions. In natural conversations, speaking style should be naturally inferred from the preceding conversational context. Therefore, we propose COT-TTS, a context-aware, reasoning-based text-to-speech task. Given historical conversation audio, target text, and a reference speech, the system should comprehend the conversational context, infer an explicit intermediate reasoning, and finally synthesize the target speech with the specified timbre. To support this task, we constructed a large-scale bilingual conversational speech dataset comprising 9 million training samples, including a high-quality subset of 1 million samples. We further constructed a source-disjoint benchmark with 800 human-verified samples and established strong task-specific baselines. Additionally, we developed end-to-end autoregressive models with parameter sizes of 0.6B and 1.7B, generating emotion-labeled transcripts, editable speech style inferences, and speech tokens. Experimental results show that the proposed model achieves performance comparable to large-scale baseline systems with significantly fewer parameters. At the same time, the model performs well in terms of duration consistency and emotional consistency, and can generate appropriate emotional, stress, and rhythmic variations based on the conversational context. To facilitate future research, we will publicly release the data construction pipeline, dataset, trained models, and related resources. The demo page and additional resources are available at https://luckybian.github.io/COT-TTS

cs.CL↗