Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2307.10997

DREAM: Domain-free Reverse Engineering Attributes of Black-box Model

Rongqing Li·Jiaqi Yu·Changsheng Li·Wenhan Luo·Ye Yuan·Guoren Wang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Deep learning models are usually black boxes when deployed on machine learning platforms. Prior works have shown that the attributes ($e.g.$, the number of convolutional layers) of a target black-box neural network can be exposed through a sequence of queries. There is a crucial limitation: these works assume the dataset used for training the target model to be known beforehand and leverage this dataset for model attribute attack. However, it is difficult to access the training dataset of the target black-box model in reality. Therefore, whether the attributes of a target black-box model could be still revealed in this case is doubtful. In this paper, we investigate a new problem of Domain-agnostic Reverse Engineering the Attributes of a black-box target Model, called DREAM, without requiring the availability of the target model's training dataset, and put forward a general and principled framework by casting this problem as an out of distribution (OOD) generalization problem. In this way, we can learn a domain-agnostic model to inversely infer the attributes of a target black-box model with unknown training data. This makes our method one of the kinds that can gracefully apply to an arbitrary domain for model attribute reverse engineering with strong generalization ability. Extensive experimental studies are conducted and the results validate the superiority of our proposed method over the baselines.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGcs.CR

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rongqing Li, Jiaqi Yu, Changsheng Li, Wenhan Luo, Ye Yuan, Guoren Wang. 2023-07-20. DREAM: Domain-free Reverse Engineering Attributes of Black-box Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10997

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

A Probabilistic Approach for Model Alignment with Human Comparisons

A growing trend involves integrating human knowledge into learning frameworks, leveraging subtle human feedback to refine AI models. While these approaches have shown promising results in practice, the theoretical understanding of when and why such approaches are effective remains limited. This work takes steps toward developing a theoretical framework for analyzing the conditions under which human comparisons can enhance the traditional supervised learning process. Specifically, this paper studies the effective use of noisy-labeled data and human comparison data to address challenges arising from noisy environment and high-dimensional models. We propose a two-stage "Supervised Learning+Learning from Human Feedback" (SL+LHF) framework that connects machine learning with human feedback through a probabilistic bisection approach. The two-stage framework first learns low-dimensional representations from noisy-labeled data via an SL procedure and then uses human comparisons to improve the model alignment. To examine the efficacy of the alignment phase, we introduce a concept, termed the "label-noise-to-comparison-accuracy" (LNCA) ratio. This paper identifies from a theoretical perspective the conditions under which the "SL+LHF" framework outperforms the pure SL approach; we then leverage this LNCA ratio to highlight the advantage of incorporating human evaluators in reducing sample complexity. We validate the framework on a real high-dimensional crowdfunding-prediction task: under a fixed query budget, trading labels for comparisons improves accuracy precisely when labels are scarce, and the findings hold when the evaluator is replaced by real large language models. A study conducted via Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) further validates the model primitives.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

An Initial Introduction to Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has exploded in popularity in recent years. While numerous approaches have been developed, they can be broadly categorized into three main types: centralized training and execution (CTE), centralized training for decentralized execution (CTDE), and decentralized training and execution (DTE). CTE methods assume centralization during training and execution (e.g., with fast, free, and perfect communication) and have the most information during execution. CTDE methods are the most common, as they leverage centralized information during training while enabling decentralized execution -- using only information available to that agent during execution. Decentralized training and execution methods make the fewest assumptions and are often simple to implement. This text is an introduction to cooperative MARL -- MARL in which all agents share a single, joint reward. It is meant to explain the setting, basic concepts, and common methods for the CTE, CTDE, and DTE settings. It does not cover all work in cooperative MARL as the area is quite extensive. I have included work that I believe is important for understanding the main concepts in the area and apologize to those that I have omitted. Topics include simple applications of single-agent methods to CTE as well as some more scalable methods that exploit the multi-agent structure, independent Q-learning and policy gradient methods and their extensions, as well as value function factorization methods including the well-known VDN, QMIX, and QPLEX approaches, and centralized critic methods including MADDPG, COMA, and MAPPO. I also discuss common misconceptions, the relationship between different approaches, and some open questions.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

TIDE: Temporal Incremental Draft Engine for Self-Improving LLM Inference

Speculative decoding can substantially accelerate LLM inference, but realizing its benefits in practice is challenging due to evolving workloads. We present TIDE (Temporal Incremental Draft Engine), a serving-engine-native framework that integrates online draft adaptation directly into high-performance LLM inference systems. TIDE reuses target model's intermediate hidden states generated during inference as training signals for draft adaptation, thereby avoiding additional target model computation and serving-time overhead. It employs adaptive runtime control to activate speculation and draft model training only when beneficial. TIDE exploits heterogeneous clusters by mapping inference and training to appropriate GPU classes. Across diverse real-world workloads, TIDE achieves up to 1.66$\times$ throughput over no-speculation baselines while recovering performance on misaligned workloads where static draft models degrade throughput. TIDE also reduces training time by up to 3.02$\times$ and storage requirements by 24$\times$ compared to existing draft training approaches, and improves system throughput by up to 1.22$\times$ on heterogeneous GPU clusters.

cs.LG↗